Fair enough. The letters that have been linked to are fine examples of professional criticisms of the matter. I generally support a lot of what is said in them. To make any progress, more of those letters (with their eloquence and professionalism) is needed. But so is more data. The strategy on this forum hurts the impact of those letters because it associates them with the shenanigans that we see here. And the strategy of completely minimizing any positive factors or positive stories also hurts the impact, because it basically excludes anyone who isn't quite as extreme from supporting your opinion. To make change and spread information, you need moderate opinions and mixed opinions, not just the militant ones. You also need data as well as the acknowledgement that other opinions have validity (when applicable - and if not, why they don't have validity). Using holocaust metaphors, slandering prominent pathologists, and telling someone they are wrong without refuting their points with real data or logic is not going to make any progress and will bring things backward.
Take someone like me, for example. I had a pretty good experience with the job market. I got a few offers as well as other chances to interview. I trained at a good program and worked hard. But I know of others who worked hard who did not have as much success as I did in the job search. Some ended up ok in the end, some got a job but not one they really wanted. I do not think the status of the job market in pathology is appropriate. Now, repeatedly on this forum you have dismissed my opinions as irrelevant, out of touch, etc, completely ignoring the fact that not only are my opinions based solely on real experience but that I agree the job market is not good and action of some sort is likely needed. If you come at this problem with a tone that includes compromise and acknowledgement of other opinion and experience, you would have me and others like me on board. But instead you marginalize my opinion, if not outright attack me for not falling lockstep in with your opinion. And you jump to make everything that remotely fits your narrative fit it, while ignoring things that don't as irrelevant. So you lose my support for anything you want to suggest. I know strident speech and such appeals to some, but it doesn't appeal to most people. It turns them off.