Python Forever
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2019
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 56
For students who underwent a long but successful post-bacc (80+ units), and recovered from a sub 3.0 GPA, how should one interpret their performance using the MSAR?
For example, I'm looking at a 3.3x cGPA and 3.4x sGPA depending on how the next year plays out for me. I had a 2.5, but bounced back with a 4.0 post-bacc over something around 75 units, and will enroll in about 12-16 more. Reading through Goro's list of schools that reward reinvention, I see that there are some top tier schools on the list, like Columbia and NYU. However, these schools have 10th percentile GPA's of 3.6+. Does this mean that I shouldn't apply to these schools despite reinventing (obviously these are amazing schools, and I'm not competitive for them; just needed examples)?
Just curious as to how I should interpret a reinvented GPA (if at all) for school targets using the MSAR. Thank you.
For example, I'm looking at a 3.3x cGPA and 3.4x sGPA depending on how the next year plays out for me. I had a 2.5, but bounced back with a 4.0 post-bacc over something around 75 units, and will enroll in about 12-16 more. Reading through Goro's list of schools that reward reinvention, I see that there are some top tier schools on the list, like Columbia and NYU. However, these schools have 10th percentile GPA's of 3.6+. Does this mean that I shouldn't apply to these schools despite reinventing (obviously these are amazing schools, and I'm not competitive for them; just needed examples)?
Just curious as to how I should interpret a reinvented GPA (if at all) for school targets using the MSAR. Thank you.