- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,525
- Reaction score
- 1,045
Last edited:
A PD (especially in the specialty you want) would be the obvious gold standard for advice here, but I personally wouldn't think I'd need to talk too much about a failure in the pre-clinical years. And not especially if I had a good Step 1 score, because that speaks for itself.Wondering how other people did this. Do you literally talk about failing biochemistry or failing a block exam, and how you remediated and improved? Or do you speak more vaguely about having successes and failures and growth and change and it was a learning experience etc etc?
Wondering how other people did this. Do you literally talk about failing biochemistry or failing a block exam, and how you remediated and improved? Or do you speak more vaguely about having successes and failures and growth and change and it was a learning experience etc etc?
This is a pre-med theory. Most residents and PDs often suggest addressing red flags in PS when applying to residency.Why bring attention to a negative?
This is a pre-med theory. Most residents and PDs often suggest addressing red flags in PS when applying to residency.
Read your first sentence. Sounds you agree with major red flags.Really? The PDs and residents I've talked to have said not to mention red flags at all unless they're major ones (having to repeat a year, Step failures, etc). Was told not to draw attention to stuff like failing a pre-clinical block or a shelf exam outside your specialty, as most PDs won't care. Maybe that's just for the field I'm entering, but idk.
Read your first sentence. Sounds you agree with major red flags.
Fair. I was just disagreeing with the mantra "why bring attention to something negative" because it's often what you should do.Major red flags yes, but not all red flags are equal. It sounded like you were implying any red flag should be addressed, I've been told otherwise by PDs.
I would advise addressing it -- when we review applications, our team never misses something like failing a block/shelf/whatever. If you have some major issue that will show up somewhere else in your application (e.g. Dean's letter), better address it up front.
If you missed it, you never would have realized you missed it... You don't know what you don't know. That said, I agree fails are obvious in all of the dean's letter samples I've ever seen. Eg my MSPE has a section asking "has this student ever remediated a course or rotation?" My school does lie on this question, but that's another story...
I'm confused -- you're suggesting we miss it when an applicant failed a shelf or clerkship?
I'm pointing out that you have no way of knowing you never missed anything. As I said above, I agree that in most cases it is obvious. But I'm just saying that if possible, for your own sake you should find out for sure what the rest of your application will say, and reveal no more. At my school, failing an OSCE technically means you have to remediate a course, but for some reason (uncharacteristic mercy?) the school will still answer "no" to the remediation question if this is all you had to remediate.
I stand by my earlier statement -- never!
Why bring attention to a negative?
Wondering how other people did this. Do you literally talk about failing biochemistry or failing a block exam, and how you remediated and improved? Or do you speak more vaguely about having successes and failures and growth and change and it was a learning experience etc etc?
A low Step 1 score is not a red flag. A low Step 1 score is still a pass. So I really doubt you would have to address a low Step 1 score in your PS, especially since you have a high Step 2 score.I have a question along these lines that I would be interested to hear peoples' opinions on. Is a below average/low step 1 score (~210, no failures) + a significant improvement in step 2 (~265) something that is "major" enough to warrant discussion in your personal statement? My instinct was to let the improvement in step 2 speak for itself and not bring up the low step 1 in my personal statement, but now I'm not sure.
A low Step 1 score is not a red flag. A low Step 1 score is still a pass. So I really doubt you would have to address a low Step 1 score in your PS, especially since you have a high Step 2 score.
Many thanks for the enlightenment, all! As you are well aware, GME is still a learning curve for me.You need to @Goro . It's almost expected that if you have a red-flag like an academic failure that you address it because it's one of the few places you can do so on your terms. Sure, there's the interview but you're in front of people and you may be nervous, The PS is the one chance you have to think through and present your red-flag in the best possible light. As to how to do it, I'd imagine @aProgDirector might be a good resource to ask.
This would make you and your date both self-conscious and uncomfortable. It is better to acknowledge the zit in a humorous way, and get on with things. "I have this huge zit, sorry if it grosses you out. I think it is alive. Its like Kuato from Total Recall, I can hear it saying 'Open your miiiiiiind.' But anyway it'll be gone in a few days." And then your date says something extremely nice like how the same thing happened to her once, etc. And you live happily ever after.Don't point out the zit on your face.
I like you because you agree with me. What are your credentials?You need to @Goro . It's almost expected that if you have a red-flag like an academic failure that you address it because it's one of the few places you can do so on your terms. Sure, there's the interview but you're in front of people and you may be nervous, The PS is the one chance you have to think through and present your red-flag in the best possible light. As to how to do it, I'd imagine @aProgDirector might be a good resource to ask.
I like you because you agree with me. What are your credentials?
A very m1 question, but if you fail an exam, is that the same as failing a block? I'm confused as to why your school would say you "remediated" if you failed an isolated exam but passed a course?
It depends on your school and the class in question. I thought about it and my rule of thumb is any failure that is reflected on your transcript/MSPE needs to be explained. If you will fail something, talk to your course director/administrators and see how it will be reflected in your MSPE/Transcript. Program Directors are still humans and are all different and MSPEs vary by school so I imagine even PDs will have varying opinions on how to interpret things.
Would having very low pre-clinical grades (bottom 25%) be considered a "red flag"? Should this be addressed in the PS? Or should this not be mentioned if the clinical grades are in the top 25%... therefore showing "improvement"?
you passed your classes. You are fine. A remediation would mean you would have to retake the class in summer.A very m1 question, but if you fail an exam, is that the same as failing a block? I'm confused as to why your school would say you "remediated" if you failed an isolated exam but passed a course?