The NAPA manager in the article sounds downright confused and apoplectic, but it seems pretty clear. NAPA probably promised the moon to Renown in order to get a contract signed. 4 months into it, when they couldn’t deliver and breached the contract (which is understandable in the current labor market) Renown exercised their right to cancel the contract. In the past, I’m sure NAPA breached contracts left and right without any consequence which the manager assumed would be the case here. Over the next decade or so, I think most anesthesiologists will be working directly for hospitals and AMCs will be out.
As this case illustrates: Hospitals need anesthesiologists. Anesthesiologists need hospitals. Nobody needs an AMC. It’ll be nice to get one layer of leeches out of healthcare.
"We service communities all over the country," said Justin Crain, a senior vice president of business operations for the national anesthesiologists.
"We are very disappointed that this is happening," Crain said. He said the legal battle with Renown has made recruiting doctors to Northern Nevada difficult.
Crain said a few anesthesiologists who are breaking their contracts have given notice, but the majority have not.
Crain, who oversees about 250 similar contracts with clients and hospitals, said what has happened with Renown is a mystery.
"I've never seen anything like this,” Crain said. “We negotiate in good faith for nine months, sign a three-plus contract, and four months into it we get a notice we are out. It just doesn't happen."