- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited by a moderator:
So has Firecracker addressed the issues with the algorithm that have been highlighted on the forum? Have the techs addressed the issues with errors being non- reportable? Is the spaced-learning more manageable now? I feel finally ready to try it out this summer (after M1), but I am unsure about going all-in on a program amidst such criticism.
How much does FC cost these days? The site doesn't seem to say.
Has anyone studied the step 2 material in firecracker? I'm about to start M3 in a month and i would really like to know what you guys think about the new material...
Well i just spent two hours going over the step 2 firecracker surgery material and the pestana notes and skimmed through Pestana's kaplan videos. Firecracker covered almost ALL of the material presented in the video and pdf. Now i don't know about the rest of the step 2 material but as far as surgery goes firecracker is EXCELLENT! Can't wait to start my surgery clerkship in 2 weeks.Looks very first-draft-y with many typos...doesn't look ready for prime time imo
Are any of you unflagging topics as you approach higher totaly banked % in order to decrease daily load a bit?
Well i just spent two hours going over the step 2 firecracker surgery material and the pestana notes and skimmed through Pestana's kaplan videos. Firecracker covered almost ALL of the material presented in the video and pdf. Now i don't know about the rest of the step 2 material but as far as surgery goes firecracker is EXCELLENT! Can't wait to start my surgery clerkship in 2 weeks.
Are you kidding me? I just compared the pestana surgery notes to the step 2 surgery material. Firecracker covered more than 90% of Pestana's notes!I think FC is pretty low yield as it is; it almost certainly isn't worth it to look at any Step 2 material.
Are you kidding me? I just compared the pestana surgery notes to the step 2 surgery material. Firecracker covered more than 90% of Pestana's notes!
Ah my bad then.That was me talking about using step 2 material on FC to study for step 1.
1 month $39http://www.gunnertraining.com/programs/medical/plans
Unless, they've changed their pricing based on a name change...
Firecracker + Picmonic is a dangerous combination for learning all those stupid bugs.
With very little to no introduction to a microbe in class, I'm learning 5 bugs a day with decent mastery - I always put 1 or 2 at first to make sure that it's not just coming from short-term memory, but if I know it the next time around I'll go ahead and put 3 or 4.
I'm doing the same thing. It's surprisingly effective. I pretty much lucked out by only paying 100$ for two years because of their student ambassador program.
I have only done antibiotics up until now. Antibiotics was the first section i banked with firecracker when i first started the program two months ago.True statement. Have you tried it with pharm yet?
This is a great combination - and each might have information that the other doesn't. I'm trying to consolidate.
I'm doing the same thing. It's surprisingly effective. I pretty much lucked out by only paying 100$ for two years because of their student ambassador program.
That's an awesome deal. Definitely going to be using the FC/picmonic combo. Are most of both of their discounts found out through your school, or do they regularly post about promotional pricing on their website/Facebook?
I posted a detailed test/study experience on the 2013 Step 1 forum. Here is a link to it
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=13985631#post13985631
In short, GT/FC was probably the most important, shortly ahead of UW, or tied with UW. All other resources were far behind these two for helping me. I got a 266.
Has anyone not going to a P/F school been able to successfully use FC? It sounds great, but I just don't know if I'll have the time to make it worthwhile.
I will be an MS2 next year.
I just finished MS2 and have been using GT/FC throughout MS2 as my primary source. Including over class notes and lectures... (though this may be a dangerous thing to do, depending on your school; feel it out). However, this is often what is required in order to fit the thing into your schedule and keep at it IMO, and which is why it might not be the best for everyone. For me, it's paid off. I've scored higher than the average (~1 SD) on everything since then. I wish I got it sooner because I don't remember much from MS1, so the bulk of what I "actually" need to study is Anatomy and Neuro. But my experience has almost been identical to his, which I hope is a good sign, but not one to underestimate the test and give me a big head just because I'm on a good pace. I still have a long time for prep and have not yet started on qbanks (well, I've started Kaplan before I do UWorld and did about 4-5 blocks of questions, but stopped for classes...scoring about 60-70%. Will resume again now that I'm on dedicated study time).
I posted a detailed test/study experience on the 2013 Step 1 forum. Here is a link to it
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=13985631#post13985631
In short, GT/FC was probably the most important, shortly ahead of UW, or tied with UW. All other resources were far behind these two for helping me. I got a 266.
Thanks, I read what you wrote when you posted that and really appreciated it!
I'm trying to compile the posts of all the FC users and see what they have to say and see how they used the program through medical school. I'm waiting to read withrye's write-up, but he seemed iffy about doing one
If you could make a post of all the posts that would be excellent...
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Why of course! Only 3 posts so far that I've seen.
I had one compiled of the 2012 but deleted it for numerous reasons
As I said a few posts ago, I'm thinking of trying out FC.
More than a few people have mentioned using FC and placing FC cards into Anki---thoughts on this? Is it overkill?
Also, Is FC's algorithm like Anki now since 'the migration'?
Also also, out of curiosity, how many cards does FC have?
If you're going to start FC, that is probably the best time to do it (besides actually during MS1). I spent that break after MS1 with physiology and biochem. I wish I got more done then because now I'm focusing on putting anatomy in, and there is a crapload of it. IMO The best way is to focus on all the memorization-heavy material first, because you will see those in your daily review for the longer time if you start them earlier. Keep this in mind when you (or if you already did) take microbiology.
Thanks for your feedback. So you suggest doing Biochem first? Anatomy was my strongest and physio was my worst.
Did you go through all subjects little by little or target 1 and move on to the next?
Haven't done micro yet. (Did micro lab/lecture during undergrad so I have some memory of it...)
Thanks for your feedback. So you suggest doing Biochem first? Anatomy was my strongest and physio was my worst.
Did you go through all subjects little by little or target 1 and move on to the next?
Haven't done micro yet. (Did micro lab/lecture during undergrad so I have some memory of it...)