- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited by a moderator:
it on gunner really thanks waiting for migrationIs this in GT or in FC? I know that in GT, when you first learn something, no matter how well you rate it (see it the first time, give it a 5), they make you review it in a couple fo days. Its there way of ensuring that you really knew the answer and that it wasnt just in your short term memory. If its happening after you have seen a question 2-3 times and you rated it a 5, thats kinda weird
Is this in GT or in FC? I know that in GT, when you first learn something, no matter how well you rate it (see it the first time, give it a 5), they make you review it in a couple fo days. Its there way of ensuring that you really knew the answer and that it wasnt just in your short term memory. If its happening after you have seen a question 2-3 times and you rated it a 5, thats kinda weird
I thought we were supposed to be migrating yesterday?
I thought we were supposed to be migrating yesterday?
How long does migration take? I got the e-mail saying stop doing stuff on GT at 2pm. Had like 300 cards to do today. Oh well.
How long does migration take? I got the e-mail saying stop doing stuff on GT at 2pm. Had like 300 cards to do today. Oh well.
I got that email today too and my favorite part was when it said migration should be done in a few hours (from 2pm). I knew not to actually believe it though.
Typical GT.
The brilliant crew at GT/FC has been adding questions/cards to FC without putting them onto GT. Thus when we were transferred, all the added questions to cards already banked has resulted in hundreds of new questions we must get through. They have absolutely no respect for us.
You don't think having several hundred questions thrust upon your account in one day is a big deal?
aidama said:Did they get rid of percent mastery on fc??
How many ppl are using GT now that are taking the exam this May/June? I figured it might be encouraging to have a thread to have a log of our progress but not sure if there are enough people for this..?
How long does migration take? I got the e-mail saying stop doing stuff on GT at 2pm. Had like 300 cards to do today. Oh well.
hey whnere did you get the msg on firecraker oor gunner?
Same situation here. I have ~400 extra cards, and no idea where they came from. Also, there are more cards now with additional information on them.
A LOT of the 400+ "NEW" cards that just appeared after transferring to FC is NOT EVEN NEW! They are making me re-bank old questions...And some of their new questions are horrible. FC/GT is just killing me...kiiillliiiinnnngggg meeeeeee!!
Can anyone help me with a "new" question that came up in Firecracker? It reads:
Meperidine is contraindicated in a patients taking which of the following drugs for treatment of Parkinsons disease?
Benztropine
Amantadine
Bromocriptine
Selegiline
Levodopa
The answer is Selegiline and the explanation reads:
Selegiline is a MAO inhibitor that can be used in the treatment of Parkinsons disease. However, meperidine is contraindicated in patients taking MAO inhibitors because of the possibility of excitation or depression that may result. Excitation symptoms include agitation, skeletal muscle rigidity, hyperpyrexia and depressive symptoms (e.g. hypotension, hypoventilation and coma).
First off, this explanation is horrible. It teaches me nothing about how meperidine causes excitation or depression when used with Selegiline. 2nd, the reference link is to the Benzo/Barbituate card...absolutely fabulous.... I hate how the new firecracker questions give poor explanations and don't highlight portions of the card that are pertinent to the question.
Anyhow, I know 2 properties make meperidine special: 1)anti-cholinergic 2)metabolite has SSRI like effects (hopefully I'm correct on this?). Furthermore, Selegiline is a SELECTIVE MAOI, only increasing dopamine levels. Thus, it is not contraindicated for use along with SSRI. Any thoughts on this? Thank you!
my GT was transferred to FC today.
I haven't been on FC for weeks now so I'm very impressed.
the only thing missing is %mastery and progress bars, i hope they add these soon.
And I had 600 new questions, but please, what's the big deal? you can reschedule.
Anyway, well done FC-crew!
I kind of agree with this, but I'm a pretty staunch anti-mcq guy. 250/450 of my new q's were multiple choice. I keep praying that they'll make them optional or just get rid of them. They keep making it better, but for the countless mcq's.
What's your gripe with MCQs? I personally like them. They're another learning modality and way of testing your understanding of the material aside from the rote memorization. Plus it's a break from 400 questions of just "What are the 6 symptoms/causes/side effects of this"
The problem is that they test your understanding the first time you see them, and every time after that you're just using rote memory to answer the MCQ. Spaced repetition is a learning paradigm for the rote memorization of associated pairs of information. Once you see an MCQ for the 5th time, you've gotten good at pairing the way that paragraph looks and is phrased with the correct answer. There is no proof that you've actually reinforced the underlying concepts that got you to that answer each time you were faced with that MCQ.
It's the same concept behind why people don't recommend doing 5 passes of UWorld, no matter how good their questions are.
Does it work if you explain the answer yourself though?
e.g. there is one MCQ belonging to "secondary causes of osteoporosis" [I think]... it's really long about a woman involved in a car crash, with irregular menstrual periods and low BMI. She sustained injuries but the question asks about the etiology of other, older injuries. The answer was hypogonadism.
I recognize the question in a fraction of a second and I know answer that matches, but I also know the explanation behind it down cold because the MCQ is so recognizable. Like...subconsciously, I don't read the question or answer anymore... the explanation pops into my head. Low BMI -> anorexic -> hypogonadism -> low estrogen -> osteoporosis
I've experienced this with qbanks. You get a question about hypothyroidism, but you miss it because it's not phrased in the same way as all the GT hypothyroid questions. You don't miss the question because you don't know about the causes and sequelae of hypothyroidism, you miss it because the presentation is trickier and more subtle. It's much more helpful to be exposed to 10 subtle and different presentation of one disease than to be presented with the same presentation 10 times, no matter how solidly you think you're reviewing the background path. No one doubts that you know the background path, the issue is more about recognizing the vignette to begin with.
GT and spaced repetition in general have no role as a qbank.
I've experienced this with qbanks. You get a question about hypothyroidism, but you miss it because it's not phrased in the same way as all the GT hypothyroid questions. You don't miss the question because you don't know about the causes and sequelae of hypothyroidism, you miss it because the presentation is trickier and more subtle. It's much more helpful to be exposed to 10 subtle and different presentation of one disease than to be presented with the same presentation 10 times, no matter how solidly you think you're reviewing the background path. No one doubts that you know the background path, the issue is more about recognizing the vignette to begin with.
GT and spaced repetition in general have no role as a qbank.
Good points both of you. So what's the solution? Do you guys then just "perfect recall" the MCQ's? I haven't PR'ed anything simply because if I recognize the fact so much it takes a half second to do it anyway...
Maybe just leave it as is and broaden my review (I'm still mainly on GT but will gradually do QBanks more and more, along with plain old FA review).