- Joined
- Dec 13, 2005
- Messages
- 5,319
- Reaction score
- 3,598
Re: G3002
I can never imagine spending 30min for a follow up visit.
I can never imagine spending 30min for a follow up visit.
update? G3002 seems more appropriate on it's face.I'm getting it independently audited. Will update when I have more info
Do you know if any commercial insurances are paying G2211?I spoke with Noridian who manages our Medicare claims. They stated that G3002 CAN be billed with E/M, which we knew. The rep couldn't clarify the conditions that would make them eligible to bill together. I did submit a test claim with both E/M and G3002, both of which paid (on an encounter where I did have to spend more than 30 minutes). But I'm not going to submit both regularly (since I don't regularly spend 30 minutes anyways, but also because I still think it's double-dipping and would not pass an audit when used by pain management specialists).
On the other hand, I've been submitting G2211 regularly with E/M. They've been paying consistently for both and I think we are well within reason to bill G2211 on almost every E/M encounter based on both mine and my billers interpretation of the coding criteria.
No, they are not. Neither is Medicaid, HMO's, or Tricare. I have a feeling they will start to, but it may be a while.Do you know if any commercial insurances are paying G2211?
Independent coder/auditor said can be billed but you, the doctor, has to spend 30 min with patient and MA time does not count.update? G3002 seems more appropriate on it's face.
since this thread is about getting reimbursed for things we’re already doing I didn’t know but interpreting X-rays carry a surprising amount of RVUs fyi
I’m assuming this is for in office X-rays without a radiologist read? I thought otherwise an independent interpretation of an xray read by a radiologist was just a part of E and Msince this thread is about getting reimbursed for things we’re already doing I didn’t know but interpreting X-rays carry a surprising amount of RVUs fyi
You are correct I am reading the film not a radiologist. I am clear the date it was taken, the date it was interpreted, and my impression.I’m assuming this is for in office X-rays without a radiologist read? I thought otherwise an independent interpretation of an xray read by a radiologist was just a part of E and M
I was told it is separate because I am interpreting the film without a radiologist. For example lumbar 4 views 72110Isn't that just part of MDM? What is the separate code you use?
Correct that’s what I do just like ortho.I think that is appropriate to read your own films and bill for it like ortho does as long as you have a diagnostic X-ray in your office and a PACs to store the films.
This is what I do.I think that is appropriate to read your own films and bill for it like ortho does as long as you have a diagnostic X-ray in your office and a PACs to store the films.
I agree with your point about more to miss in the spine than the knees and shoulders. However, practically speaking, for those who work in a ortho group it is standard culture to get X-rays in office. Most people will end up getting MRIs.This is reasonable, but just don’t miss a tumor. Or ankylosing spondylitis. Or a bunch of other stuff.
You are taking on a fair amount of risk if you read you own X-rays. There’s more to miss along the spine than in knees and shoulders