- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 6,049
- Reaction score
- 3,856
Anybody ever experience a pain doc not being able to access CSF for an intrathecal catheter placed @T12-L1...under GA... WITH FLOURO? diving deeper and deeper... They don't like that feeling... and nor do I. Some of those fluoro images look like you are intrathecal... but you are not.
No thanks. I'm not placing a spinal in a C/S patient that is paralyzed and under general anesthesia (even if I asked for fluoro).
IMHO, Not worth it. Not for this case.
TAP blocks have nothing to do with billing. They are a fantastic modality of analgesia when a specific situation arises ie: stat C/S under GA, midline incisions that need immediate anticoagulants post op, laparoscopic procedures that turn into wide midline incisions when you didn't place a pre-op epidural...
They are easy if you know what you are doing, and a clear effect is seen. Billing has nothing to do with it. Sheez.
I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but please think twice before performing spinals under GA in the adult population.
Maybe I'm unaware of the great benefits of GA spinals, but I would hate for a patient to wake up with a deficit.
I've had a single shot awake block last 38 hours. I hated it.
Long turniquet time... but still... the relief when he regained full function. Honestly scared me.
You'd be ripe for lawyer picking. Seriously. Simple USG peripheral nerve blocks (TAP, saphenous, forearm, ankle, hand, even femorals) are SO MUCH less risky than neuraxials under GA (USD ain't THAT helpful compared to peripheral NB's). I don't need a study to tell me this.
To me, it's obvious if you understand the anatomy and the (minute but very possible) consequences. It only takes one.
My 2 cents to all the residens reading this thread.
No thanks. I'm not placing a spinal in a C/S patient that is paralyzed and under general anesthesia (even if I asked for fluoro).
IMHO, Not worth it. Not for this case.
TAP blocks have nothing to do with billing. They are a fantastic modality of analgesia when a specific situation arises ie: stat C/S under GA, midline incisions that need immediate anticoagulants post op, laparoscopic procedures that turn into wide midline incisions when you didn't place a pre-op epidural...
They are easy if you know what you are doing, and a clear effect is seen. Billing has nothing to do with it. Sheez.
I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but please think twice before performing spinals under GA in the adult population.
Maybe I'm unaware of the great benefits of GA spinals, but I would hate for a patient to wake up with a deficit.
I've had a single shot awake block last 38 hours. I hated it.
Long turniquet time... but still... the relief when he regained full function. Honestly scared me.
You'd be ripe for lawyer picking. Seriously. Simple USG peripheral nerve blocks (TAP, saphenous, forearm, ankle, hand, even femorals) are SO MUCH less risky than neuraxials under GA (USD ain't THAT helpful compared to peripheral NB's). I don't need a study to tell me this.
To me, it's obvious if you understand the anatomy and the (minute but very possible) consequences. It only takes one.
My 2 cents to all the residens reading this thread.