I had a recent call with a plaintiff attorney representing family of mid 20s female with schizophrenia who committed suicide while inpatient. They asked if I would be able to refute defense expert's claims that the patient was high risk and had a significantly reduced life expectancy on the order of less than 5 years due schizophrenia and history of suicide attempts. Plaintiff attorney said this prediction was based on a sophisticated predictive model of people with severe mental illness. The defense argument is basically that the total years of life lost is low, so value of lawsuit is minimal.
I told the plaintiff attorney I was aware of research finding people with SMI have reduced life spans on the order of 5-15 years vs general population, not 40-50 years shorter which would be the case with the patient in this scenario. My understanding is the data is informative at the population level but shouldn't be used to say any one individual has a certain expected life span. And said I was not aware of predictive models that could be used to determine the life expectancy of an individual in this way.
I'm just curious if predictive models like this exist and are actually used in court. Are they in the realm of expert psychiatrists vs PhD statisticians? Do they stand up to Daubert challenges?
I told the plaintiff attorney I was aware of research finding people with SMI have reduced life spans on the order of 5-15 years vs general population, not 40-50 years shorter which would be the case with the patient in this scenario. My understanding is the data is informative at the population level but shouldn't be used to say any one individual has a certain expected life span. And said I was not aware of predictive models that could be used to determine the life expectancy of an individual in this way.
I'm just curious if predictive models like this exist and are actually used in court. Are they in the realm of expert psychiatrists vs PhD statisticians? Do they stand up to Daubert challenges?