futureemdoc1
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 3
Anyone see this where EM docs work in the CC either with or without CC fellowship?
EM-trained physicians are not staffing ICUs without completing a fellowship.Anyone see this where EM docs work in the CC either with or without CC fellowship?
Hmm I'm curious why the drive to switch? Isn't the salaries relatively close? I work in the ED but enjoy working with the CC physicians and certainly can see there is some difference in training.
Hmm I'm curious why the drive to switch? Isn't the salaries relatively close? I work in the ED but enjoy working with the CC physicians and certainly can see there is some difference in training.
Seems like that is the correct answer. Strange to fellow and lose salary to enter another specialty with high burnout.Cause you want to do critical care. Has nothing to do with the money.
Seems like that is the correct answer. Strange to fellow and lose salary to enter another specialty with high burnout.
Cause you want to do critical care. Has nothing to do with the money.
Seems like that is the correct answer. Strange to fellow and lose salary to enter another specialty with high burnout.
The burnout is not additive. On the contrary, the freedom to move between different fields/environments reduces burnout.
The burnout is not additive. On the contrary, the freedom to move between different fields/environments reduces burnout.
Trained with some badass em docs. I think ER training leaves them well equipped to Deal with acute critical care problems. Like anesthesiologists, we both need to work on chronic care and seeing the same patient every day
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I'm currently at a place with EM docs, anesthesiologists, and surgeons all in the same "fellow" pool. A fellow is a fellow here. We all start in different places, but the expectation set by our faculty is that we will all end in the same place and we will all share our different skill sets and tips and tricks with one another. Hell, when the pulm/ccm fellows are on our services they are just one of us and vice versa. Same expectations. Frankly, I love the multidisciplinary approach. I learn so much from other specialties, I know I would hate being a program with only gas or only surgery or only IM.Trained with some badass em docs. I think ER training leaves them well equipped to Deal with acute critical care problems. Like anesthesiologists, we both need to work on chronic care and seeing the same patient every day
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Agreed, had a similar set up and loved the multidisciplinary approach. Learned a lot from my co fellows.I'm currently at a place with EM docs, anesthesiologists, and surgeons all in the same "fellow" pool. A fellow is a fellow here. We all start in different places, but the expectation set by our faculty is that we will all end in the same place and we will all share our different skill sets and tips and tricks with one another. Hell, when the pulm/ccm fellows are on our services they are just one of us and vice versa. Same expectations. Frankly, I love the multidisciplinary approach. I learn so much from other specialties, I know I would hate being a program with only gas or only surgery or only IM.
And the last point, I think is probably spot on. I think Anes, surgery, and EM start off with a mindset that fits well with the bulk of care provided in CT and SICUs. High acuity with a relatively predictable throughput model and our IM colleagues seem more adapted to "this person has been in the unit for the last 13 weeks" and having a clear thought about where to go next.
But I don't buy that only IM docs can staff a MICU, or only EM/surg/Anes can staff a CT or SICU. Our strengths may initially align better with patients/pathologies/work flows but any sufficiently trained and motivated intensivist can learn to function anywhere, IMHO.
I'm currently at a place with EM docs, anesthesiologists, and surgeons all in the same "fellow" pool. A fellow is a fellow here. We all start in different places, but the expectation set by our faculty is that we will all end in the same place and we will all share our different skill sets and tips and tricks with one another. Hell, when the pulm/ccm fellows are on our services they are just one of us and vice versa. Same expectations. Frankly, I love the multidisciplinary approach. I learn so much from other specialties, I know I would hate being a program with only gas or only surgery or only IM.
And the last point, I think is probably spot on. I think Anes, surgery, and EM start off with a mindset that fits well with the bulk of care provided in CT and SICUs. High acuity with a relatively predictable throughput model and our IM colleagues seem more adapted to "this person has been in the unit for the last 13 weeks" and having a clear thought about where to go next.
But I don't buy that only IM docs can staff a MICU, or only EM/surg/Anes can staff a CT or SICU. Our strengths may initially align better with patients/pathologies/work flows but any sufficiently trained and motivated intensivist can learn to function anywhere, IMHO.
Very common for EM/CCM dual training in Canada.
so are ketchup potato chips in Canada
don't make it right
You'll never ever see an NP running even a tiny community ICU during nights in Canada. USA? Everywhere.
I need to live in Canada. If only it was warm....You'll never ever see an NP running even a tiny community ICU during nights in Canada. USA? Everywhere.
I need to live in Canada. If only it was warm....
I think I’m falling in love with you.I'm currently at a place with EM docs, anesthesiologists, and surgeons all in the same "fellow" pool. A fellow is a fellow here. We all start in different places, but the expectation set by our faculty is that we will all end in the same place and we will all share our different skill sets and tips and tricks with one another. Hell, when the pulm/ccm fellows are on our services they are just one of us and vice versa. Same expectations. Frankly, I love the multidisciplinary approach. I learn so much from other specialties, I know I would hate being a program with only gas or only surgery or only IM.
And the last point, I think is probably spot on. I think Anes, surgery, and EM start off with a mindset that fits well with the bulk of care provided in CT and SICUs. High acuity with a relatively predictable throughput model and our IM colleagues seem more adapted to "this person has been in the unit for the last 13 weeks" and having a clear thought about where to go next.
But I don't buy that only IM docs can staff a MICU, or only EM/surg/Anes can staff a CT or SICU. Our strengths may initially align better with patients/pathologies/work flows but any sufficiently trained and motivated intensivist can learn to function anywhere, IMHO.
What program is this? Cause I want to go there!Agreed, had a similar set up and loved the multidisciplinary approach. Learned a lot from my co fellows.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I assume you live in the southern US?I need to live in Canada. If only it was warm....
Same here. Our PCCM colleauges are now a significant minority, which is too bad because I really like their perspective. I think a good shop has a nice balance of backgrounds. There remains much to learn from each other. I wonder if this EM/CCM trend will continue,We hired 3 EM/CC guys last year and just recently hired another. Were now majority EM/CC or EM/IM/CC.
Yup. But not for long. Right now all over America, North, South, East, West, it is boiling.I assume you live in the southern US?
It's been in the mid 80F all month where I live. Last summer it hit 121F in Lytton BC. We don't all live in igloos up here. But my igloo is pretty nice.Yup. But not for long. Right now all over America, North, South, East, West, it is boiling.