And what are you basing this on, the amount of NIH funds awarded to the program. Well if that's the case, Harvard wasn't even in the top 30. The Cleveland Clinic wasn't ranked but then neither was Wash. U which is supposedly a far better program according to our author Mr. TipleJ. And Thomas Jefferson Medical College was ranked 5th so I'm sure it's derm department is far more prestigious than Harvard's in your eyes.
Let's not lose sight of the argument. U.S. News doesn't rank dermatology programs. And many times, selectivity is based on subjective criteria as opposed to concrete funding dollars. The Cleveland Clinic was ranked 4th overall and is a top 5-10 hospital on an annual basis. Many top candidates would prefer to study at the Cleveland Clinic versus Thomas Jefferson or the University of Utah despite the latter programs being better funded. As with Harvard, the Cleveland Clinic carries with it a name, something even Case Western lacks despite its funding. So for a DO to match at the Cleveland Clinic in dermatology is a huge accomplishment let alone matching at any allopathic program. Trying to downplay that just to make a point is rather silly.