Thanks for the wisdom! Completely agree with the last statement - I am still inexperienced (only placed a little more than 100 epidurals) and very much respect and value everyone's advice. Early on I tried different combinations of intermittent vs. continuous, plastic vs. glass, and air vs. saline. I settled on intermittent, plastic, air and since have gotten very comfortable with that combination. I have a few additional questions that I would appreciate any and all feedback on:
1) I have been forcing myself to use LOR to saline w/ an air bubble in a glass syringe as many here seem to advocate this combination. An issue I run into is that if I attach the syringe too early (while Touhy is rather shallow), I am able to easily inject saline despite clearly not being in epidural space. When should I be attaching the syringe, only after I think I have engaged any ligament (supraspinous, interspinous, or flavum)? Or only after I think I am in flavum (though can be mushy and this seems like a recipe for a wet tap)? Is it a known issue to be able to easily inject saline into subq or non-flavum ligament, or could it be something as stupid as I don't have my LOR syringe firmly enough attached to the Touhy needle? Air has been a crutch for me because it seems more sensitive as I can simply pop the touhy in to 2-3 cm, starting checking for loss immediately (despite sometimes still being in subQ) without ever getting loss until I am in epidural space. While I am advancing, I try to assess for more tactile feedback (see below).
2) My understanding is that the first change in resistance felt is typically supraspinous ligament (which can be very crunchy, can feel like flavum but touhy will remain floppy) -> followed by lower resistance interspinous ligament -> followed by the final change of increased resistance into "gritty" flavum at which point the touhy should feel embedded and no longer floppy. Sometimes flavum is mushy and you won't feel it. Is my understanding correct?
3) Continuous vs. intermittent technique - how important is this really? This would be my (potentially) 3rd wet tap that I know of. I'm sure I could do better and perhaps switching to continuous would result in less wet taps in the long run. In terms of speed, I typically take 5-10 minutes from putting gloves on to giving the test dose. Is continuous technique really so much better and faster that it is worth pursuing?
Thanks in advance everyone! Attendings where I train don't teach and tend to do things in one style, so you have all been my teachers by proxy via your conversations, and for that I am grateful.