Contract Non-Renwal due to FFD Testing (Desperate need for guidance)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ClearEyesFullHeart

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
11
Reaction score
25
Hi-- I am reaching out today after months of uncertainties and ultimately running out of any resources/outlets to provide any advice or guidance. I will try my best to keep this short but feel free to ask about any missing info/details as I don't have any intentions to hide anything. I am an American medical graduate currently in my PGY-2 year in a Psychiatry program. I passed Step 1 and Step 2 on first attempt and was in good standing throughout college and medical school (no disciplinary issues/ no failed clinical rotations) and matched at my top choice for residency programs.

Residency started off great with my first three clinical rotations ending with great evaluations from both attendings and peers. My 4th rotation, however, was an off-service internal medicine rotation at the VA and on Day 1 I knew it would be a challenge. I take full responsibility of my shortcomings this month including: disorganized and inefficient presentations/ general lack of medical knowledge (hadn't done IM since my 3rd year in med school)/ three occasions when I was the last to show up in the morning (leading to more disorganization.) However, my upper-level resident (a PGY-2) throughout this month made the environment even more uncomfortable, but as a new resident, I just assumed this was the culture of residency. Looking back, I do think his constant cursing at female nursing and social work staff and racially-inspired remarks ("Why did you choose to go into medicine when you could have worked at your dad's liquor store?"- I'm of SE Asian descent and this is a stereotype) made it even more tough to have any confidence in my work. Halfway through the month, I spoke with my PGY-2 resident to see what changes I could make and the last ~10 days of the rotation went smoothly.

However, after this rotation ended-- I voluntarily reached out to our Assistant Program Director and spoke with her about what I can do to "redeem" myself, as I fully expected to receive negative evaluations. Turned out I was correct-- my PGY-2 resident submitted an evaluation after my first 2 weeks into the rotation with remarks including "Resident is late/ unorganized/ questionable if she is pre-rounding on patients based on her presentations/ lack of medical knowledge/ resident is unavailable). His evaluation from this rotation encouraged me to make sure these things were corrected for my next internal medicine rotation. Additionally, his evaluation was submitted half-way through the rotation and he never submitted an updated evaluation after the conclusion of the rotation.

A few weeks later, my program director asked to meet with me about this negative evaluation and I assured him that I take full responsibility and that my current rotation was the complete opposite and going great.

Four rotations went by and my evaluations continued to be great. In April, I had my second internal medicine rotation and, this time, my PGY-2 upper level resident was a huge support system and I started the rotation telling him about how my first IM rotation went and how I would appreciate on-the-spot feedback throughout the rotation. I got through this rotation and did not have any problems and moved on to my next rotation. However, about a month later-- one of my IM attendings submitted an evaluation into the system (we did not meet for "feedback" or review at the end of the rotation) that noted 2 issues on the rotation, the first: she reported that on one afternoon, she asked me to see a patient (who was deteriorating and, unfortunately, passed away) and she is not sure if I did based on my report the next morning and the second: working on "closed loop communication" with consults. I was shocked to see the first issue, as not only did I see the patient, I also brought my medical student to see the patient and have text messages to my attending from that evening about the patient's condition and any changes in the plan she wanted to make. I reached out to this attending after reading this evaluation to set up a time to discuss these critiques and to clear any misunderstandings or miscommunication-- we went back and forth on finding a date that would work with us but ultimately did not end up meeting up.

My program director called me into his office again-- this time, to discuss this negative feedback and how he was seeing a "pattern" in these two negative evaluations. I tried to assure my PD that there must have been some miscommunication and that my attending never approached me about this during the rotation about this and, rather, gave positive reinforcement throughout the rotation. Additionally, my rotations before and after this rotation had great evaluations.

At this point, I felt like I was under a microscope for the next few rotations. I was hypervigilant about making a mistake and felt like any mistake or misstep would be reported immediately to my PD. I did a good job at concealing it for a few months-- however, during the first two rotations of my PGY-2 year, it had caught up with me and my anxious-nervousness definitely took away from my confidence and I was making errors because of it (taking on too many patients to prove myself/ ordering a wrong lab/ calling a patient by the wrong name after because the patient was switched overnight/ leaving details out of the plans in patient notes.) Additionally, I previously scheduled to take Step 3 one of my inpatient rotations-- but shortly after meeting with my PD-- I decided to delay it to my "night float" month a few months later due to not wanting to ask for time off soon to take this exam from an inpatient rotation/ not wanting my PD to think anything of it. Ultimately, this was a bad decision and taking a board exam during nightfloat was not setting me up for success-- I failed Step 3 (but re-took it within the next 3 months and passed!)

Two months into my PGY-2 year, my PD calls me into his office. Though there were about 10 positive evaluations from attendings that believed I was doing well, we focused on negative comments. I asked my program director which evaluations he was referring to and where this "pattern" was being seen-- and he reported that these evaluations are not documented, rather, they are comments that reached his desk through different platforms (word-of-mouth/ e-mails). When I asked for examples or which rotation they were referring to, my PD would make vague blanket statements regarding a pattern he was seeing and a "wealth of negative evaluations" that are not in the system that he could not share with me or show me. Because I am a very timid and shy person, I usually just "put my head down" and say yes sir and take responsibility. However, at one point, my PD accused me of being dishonest and that is when I defended myself, as I have never tried to deceive or be dishonest and was not going to accept being told I was. As soon as I started to show my PD the "paper trail" that would exonerate me from any accusation of dishonesty, he immediately got frustrated and told me not to return to my clinical rotation tomorrow and that starting tomorrow I would be on a "reading elective." At this time, my PD asked me if there was anything going on personally that would be affecting my performance and, though it was painful to reveal personal issues to someone I do not know personally, I did disclose what I was going through personally at this time.

I was started on the "reading elective" on September 1st. The only direction I was given from my PD was to "get therapy" (at our hospital's Employee Assistance Program) and to meet a faculty advisor weekly. I also was told to study for our inservice exam and to re-take Step 3. Shortly after, I re-took Step 3 and passed this time. I started therapy and changed my medication regimen for ADHD (I have been diagnosed and started medication in medical school).

The month of September passes and towards the end of every month my scheduling chief would report that she has "gotten no word" on whether I am back on schedule. Every two-three weeks, I would email my PD to give him an "update" and "check-in" regarding returning to clinical duties. I would get a vague response in an e-mail and my PD tells me that it would be best if I went through "Fitness for duty" testing with a forensic neuropsychologist to give them a better idea of what direction to go-- this FFD testing was completed by a professional that my PD knows well and who used to work for the hospital. I was told to be patient, continue therapy, continue meeting with my faculty advisor, and he would arrange for the FFD testing. September passed by, October passes by, November passes, and in December-- I finally meet with my PD and GME Director and we set up a plan for formal remediation: we sign a contract that includes completing the FFD testing, getting back on clinical rotations and highlighted the areas that would need to be performed and excelled at during this remediation time. I finally complete four days worth of FFD testing which included a full interview of early childhood/ adolescent years/ college/ medical school performance, as well as a myriad of personality testing, depression screenings, ADHD screening, and multiple cognitive exams. At the end of the testing, the evaluator reviewed the recommendations she made and we discussed certain goals and changes I could make, as well as accommodations I think would help in the clinical setting.

After receiving the recommendations, I made sure I started on each one of them to further show my program that I was determined to be back on service-- including paying for a ADHD therapist/ coach to meet with weekly, evaluation by a sleep specialist in case sleep was an issue, continuing to meet with my faculty advisor, continuing personal therapy, and working on my clinical knowledge. During this time, however, despite multiple requests via e-mail to meet with my PD to see when the formal remediation would begin/ return to clinical duties (as the FFD was complete and Step 3 was passed)-- I receive vague responses that the program is "working to meet with GME." During this time, I also reached out to my previous attendings from the off service rotations to see if maybe they were the source of "extra evaluations" that are not documented in the system and they all denied any contact with my PD or program.

December goes by, January goes by, and in mid-February, I finally get a less vague response from my program director. I get a long email from my PD saying I will not be returning to clinical duties because "the FFD confirmed our previous concerns and that nothing would change if I was given the chance to remediate in the clinical setting." As you can imagine, after all these months of being isolated without a formal plan and uncertainties, this e-mail crushed me. I called my program director and asked how this decision was made and on what basis and my program director asked why I was so surprised and that "I must have seen this coming"-- this is the opposite of what I believed was coming due to affirmations from my chief residents and from my faculty advisor that the program was working out details and being patient would be the best way to handle this situation. My PD apologized for the 7 months of uncertainty and reported that "it would be in my best interest to leave residency due to medical reasons or to apply for FMLA/ disability and take time off to take care of myself." At this point, I am very confused because the purpose of the last few months was to "work on myself." My PD tells me he feels "uncomfortable" releasing the FFD to me-- and rather, he would prefer to release it to a clinician, i.e. my psychiatrist. A week or two later, I review the FFD with my psychiatrist and speak to the evaluator to see where it was implied that changes could not be made-- she reported she did not make such claims but it was up to the program to interpret the findings from the FFD. The FFD basically showed that the testing revealed I truly do have ADHD, had an above average IQ, remote and distant memory and the two areas that were lacking were "visuo-tactile response time and auditory-visual response time." Interestingly enough, the FFD included only the evaluations in the computer system (that we all have access to" and the only two collateral interviews that were completed were from my program director (who I have NEVER worked with clinically) and one other attending.

Soon after, I meet with the GME director and my PD. Again, I ask my PD if I could have more clarification as to how this decision was made and what allegations/ what data supports this. My GME director (who is not in our department/ relying solely on the info provided by my PD) suggests that a unilateral decision cannot be made-- and that my PD must meet with the clinical competency committee and we will reconvene our meeting in two weeks. At the next meeting, my PD plainly reports that the "CCC has decided to not renew my contract" and reports that he thinks it would be in my best interest to apply for disability and "take time off to care for myself." The GME director says that we will reconvene in another week after I have enough time to look over disability paperwork and "options for moving forward will be discussed at the next meeting." During this meeting, I told my PD I have been meeting with previous attendings and peers to see what possible extra/hidden evaluations are out there and uncovered nothing-- to which I received a vague umbrella answer that "there was enough data to make this decision." My PD also stated that "it would be fruitless and an unproductive use of my time" to submit an Appeal to the GME Grievances committee because patient safety is the main concern. Also, my GME director has repeatedly stated during our meetings that "this is not disciplinary action" and that there is no question of being "terminated".

At this time, I feel extremely lost. I spoke with multiple attorneys who have advised me to not sign any disability paperwork, as there has been no trauma/ new injury that would cause me to be incapable of working and I have been receiving all the recommended treatment for ADHD (both medication management, therapy, etc.) I also met with another forensic neurocognitive psychologist (NOT affiliated with the hospital) and asked him to review the FFD and recommend any further cognitive testing (because at this point, I am starting to believe that maybe I truly do need to look further into this.) This neurocog psychologist actually laughed out loud and stated that there was absolutely no indication for any cognitive testing and stated that, after reviewing the FFD, he has some major concerns about the validity of the tests given, as well as the FFD being very inconclusive and leaving a lot of discretion for the reader to make assumptions.

At this point, I do not know what to do. I am meeting with GME and my program director tomorrow and do not know how to proceed. I am almost positive that if I refuse to sign paperwork claiming that I am disabled, they will terminate me on the spot (or I can resign, whichever.) Does anyone have any guidance?

Lastly, I am not denying that I struggled during some rotations. I just wish I was told during the problem rotations of what was being perceived as deficient to give me the opportunity to make changes.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
Reactions: 1 user
I don't have a lot to say other than I wish you good luck. You're already talking with lawyers, so listen to what they have to say on whether or not they see any chance of you managing to fight this and keep your spot. Unfortunately, once a program has decided to cut you loose the odds are stacked against you, and I think you're going to have a really tough time in a battle of your word vs their that you WEREN'T putting patients in danger. Realistically your best chance is to make this split on as good terms as possible and try to secure a positive (or at least neutral) LOR from your PD and either catch on with another program or re-apply to PGY-1 positions in psych and/or other other less competitive fields (maybe not IM).

For others reading this giant block of text... I'd say the moral of the story is don't wait until the end of a rotation to address deficiencies. If you realize on day 1 that you're way behind your peers (whether you're off-service or not), then starting on day 2 you'd better be the first one there and not the last. You should start asking for for feedback from your senior and attending each week and not waiting until the last ~10 days of the rotation. You can be in the bottom 5% and still get by if you're showing that you really care about improving, as at least then your superiors are less likely to go out of their way to give you a bad eval; if they think (fairly or not) that you DON'T care, they're more likely to crush you on the evals. Once you wind up under the microscope it can be very hard to get out from under it, as the OP's story shows.

It's entirely possible that the OP has been treated unfairly here, but there are also plenty of other things that you can do that ARE under your control if you ever find yourself in a similar situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
To properly fire a resident they have to go through all the procedures. As soon as they recommended therapy, FFD and put you on remediation, the decision was already made to give you the boot eventually. They are just protecting themselves from a lawsuit.

My advice is to get a letter from your program director and reapply in the match or try to transfer. There is nothing left to salvage at your program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
To properly fire a resident they have to go through all the procedures. As soon as they recommended therapy, FFD and put you on remediation, the decision was already made to give you the boot eventually. They are just protecting themselves from a lawsuit.

My advice is to get a letter from your program director and reapply in the match or try to transfer. There is nothing left to salvage at your program.

Yeah, after reading through my own post-- I'm realizing this is very true. I met with my program director individually only one time between September and February and exchanged a total of 9 emails between September and February (albeit our city did experience a hurricane and our program has been going through a lot of turnover with attendings, so I understand that administration/ he is extremely busy. But I think the decision was made very early on and I just didn't see that.

I have actually been applying for transfer programs (re-starting PGY-2 year) and coincidentally, my home program where I rotated through for two years may have an available spot for the PGY-2 year starting in July (they have a resident transferring out.) However, I am concerned that, from the very limited communication with my PD, that he will insist on waiting a full year until the next cycle to go back into the clinical setting to "further take care of myself" (for the sake of continuing this narrative of a "disability" and thus, giving a recommendation (either positive or neutral) would contradict this entirely.) I am worried that it will come off as me having "little insight" into my disability-- though, I have been at home for the past almost 8 months "taking care of myself" by going to therapy and getting my ducks in a row. Do you have any suggestions of how to approach this?
 
I don't have a lot to say other than I wish you good luck. You're already talking with lawyers, so listen to what they have to say on whether or not they see any chance of you managing to fight this and keep your spot. Unfortunately, once a program has decided to cut you loose the odds are stacked against you, and I think you're going to have a really tough time in a battle of your word vs their that you WEREN'T putting patients in danger. Realistically your best chance is to make this split on as good terms as possible and try to secure a positive (or at least neutral) LOR from your PD and either catch on with another program or re-apply to PGY-1 positions in psych and/or other other less competitive fields (maybe not IM).

For others reading this giant block of text... I'd say the moral of the story is don't wait until the end of a rotation to address deficiencies. If you realize on day 1 that you're way behind your peers (whether you're off-service or not), then starting on day 2 you'd better be the first one there and not the last. You should start asking for for feedback from your senior and attending each week and not waiting until the last ~10 days of the rotation. You can be in the bottom 5% and still get by if you're showing that you really care about improving, as at least then your superiors are less likely to go out of their way to give you a bad eval; if they think (fairly or not) that you DON'T care, they're more likely to crush you on the evals. Once you wind up under the microscope it can be very hard to get out from under it, as the OP's story shows.

It's entirely possible that the OP has been treated unfairly here, but there are also plenty of other things that you can do that ARE under your control if you ever find yourself in a similar situation.

Thank you. Yes, I completely agree-- since the FFD, as much as I have wanted to defend myself and fight for what I've spent so many years working on, I decided it would be in my best interest/ use of time to look into other programs/ transfer opportunities because I would be setting myself up for failure for trying to pursue my current program further. I only chose to seek the help of attorneys to make sure I didn't sign something that would be detrimental in the future (i.e. my program director and his administrative assistant putting a TON of pressure for me to sign paperwork for disability for the past two weeks and thankfully the legal counsel deterred me away from that.)
 
Yeah, after reading through my own post-- I'm realizing this is very true. I met with my program director individually only one time between September and February and exchanged a total of 9 emails between September and February (albeit our city did experience a hurricane and our program has been going through a lot of turnover with attendings, so I understand that administration/ he is extremely busy. But I think the decision was made very early on and I just didn't see that.

I have actually been applying for transfer programs (re-starting PGY-2 year) and coincidentally, my home program where I rotated through for two years may have an available spot for the PGY-2 year starting in July (they have a resident transferring out.) However, I am concerned that, from the very limited communication with my PD, that he will insist on waiting a full year until the next cycle to go back into the clinical setting to "further take care of myself" (for the sake of continuing this narrative of a "disability" and thus, giving a recommendation (either positive or neutral) would contradict this entirely.) I am worried that it will come off as me having "little insight" into my disability-- though, I have been at home for the past almost 8 months "taking care of myself" by going to therapy and getting my ducks in a row. Do you have any suggestions of how to approach this?

Don't worry about how your PD might react. Ask and deal with it if it comes up.

They'll probably be happy you are moving on to somewhere else honestly. Unless the PD is really dead set on destroying your chances, I doubt they'd really give you that much grief. The path of least resistance would be to let you leave to your home program with a mediocre LOR. I have unfortunately seen this happen a few times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I'm so sorry to hear that you are going through this and my heart is with you. I went through something pretty similar during residency, had the whole cognitive evaluations bit, placed on academic probation, nearly kicked out so I could definitely relate. I was lucky that people from my program were a lot more lenient, chill, and understanding about things. We were also a newly minted residency program and I was part of the first class, so I think there was a level of self interest there to keep me on board. I don't have much to offer other than to say... keep a cool level head which you already seem to be doing. This is not the time to be emotional, this is the time to rational and think about the next steps. I think you will have an uphill battle going forward. I agree with what others have said, try to obtain a letter of recommendation from your PD, at least a neutral tone one, because I think you will definitely need this if you're going to apply for another program. One thing I will say is that in medical training, you will meet all kinds of attendings, ones that are more chill and ones that are more hardasses, being able to discern which one you have in front of you, in a moments notice, will do you wonders. Don't be late to class for those hardcore attendings!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I usually say that residents don't get fired for no reason and that 99% of the time, there's a reason and the resident isn't being truthful about the whole story.

Sadly, there's also a percentage of these cases in which the program is not treating you fairly by not disclosing what their concerns are. For the residency program to not tell you flat-out what was in the FFD evaluation and why they're concerned about you is unfair and imo a violation of your rights. I think in these cases, the reason they're not telling you is because it's either a personality disorder they don't want to reveal to you, a finding they're scared to reveal to you, or a finding that should not be fireable and they know they'll get in trouble for firing you because of it if it's revealed. There's just no other reason for a program to be so vague about why they're firing you. Lack of knowledge? Say so. Patient safety? Say so and detail why. Inability to get along with others? Say so and state evidence. Residents deserve to know why they're being terminated when it has such a profound impact on their career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Thank you. Yes, I completely agree-- since the FFD, as much as I have wanted to defend myself and fight for what I've spent so many years working on, I decided it would be in my best interest/ use of time to look into other programs/ transfer opportunities because I would be setting myself up for failure for trying to pursue my current program further. I only chose to seek the help of attorneys to make sure I didn't sign something that would be detrimental in the future (i.e. my program director and his administrative assistant putting a TON of pressure for me to sign paperwork for disability for the past two weeks and thankfully the legal counsel deterred me away from that.)

What i find disturbing is that there was a 7 month delay where you did nothing essentially? no clinical duties? I don't even know what to say about that. were you paid during that time? i dont even know how they could possibly justify that ? something is going on here. normally it's best to try to keep calm and try to work things out but i am not sure how this can even be explained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There's quite a bit to unpack here.

At this point, I felt like I was under a microscope for the next few rotations. I was hypervigilant about making a mistake and felt like any mistake or misstep would be reported immediately to my PD. I did a good job at concealing it for a few months-- however, during the first two rotations of my PGY-2 year, it had caught up with me and my anxious-nervousness definitely took away from my confidence and I was making errors because of it

This is a very common problem. Once a resident has flagged as a possible problem, the program has no choice to but to be more vigilant. This can result in the discovery of "issues" that otherwise would have never been noticed, and may magnify what otherwise would not be picked up at all. Or, as in your case, may create a vicious cycle of anxiety creating more problems.

Though there were about 10 positive evaluations from attendings that believed I was doing well, we focused on negative comments. I asked my program director which evaluations he was referring to and where this "pattern" was being seen-- and he reported that these evaluations are not documented, rather, they are comments that reached his desk through different platforms (word-of-mouth/ e-mails).

It's a common refrain from residents who are struggling that their bad evaluations are balanced by their good ones. Most residents get all good evaluations -- they may comment about areas that the resident could work on to improve, but the tone and content are clear that their performance is fine. Any number of evaluations which suggest otherwise is usually a problem. In our program we do take into consideration whom the evaluation is coming from, and we don't panic with a single poor evaluation. But once there's more than one, there's usually a problem. This isn't like undergrad or medical school where your evals are averaged together. Variability may be due to variability in clinical performance, assessment of problems that only happen occasionally, and unwillingness of evaluators to honestly assess residents. We have group evaluations on one of our rotations, and it's interesting to see that once one faculty member states that they have some concerns, others start to say "well, I wasn't going to say anything but ...". We keep both individual and group evals for this reason.

When I asked for examples or which rotation they were referring to, my PD would make vague blanket statements regarding a pattern he was seeing and a "wealth of negative evaluations" that are not in the system that he could not share with me or show me.

This is a huge problem, but common. When I get concerns from someone outside of the evaluation system, I highly encourage them to submit it via the eval system. If they won't, I ask if I can summarize the findings and submit it myself -- this can keep them anonymous which might make them more comfortable but makes the comments less useful to the resident. Having them be secret is unacceptable in my view.

Because I am a very timid and shy person, I usually just "put my head down" and say yes sir and take responsibility. However, at one point, my PD accused me of being dishonest and that is when I defended myself, as I have never tried to deceive or be dishonest and was not going to accept being told I was. As soon as I started to show my PD the "paper trail" that would exonerate me from any accusation of dishonesty, he immediately got frustrated and told me not to return to my clinical rotation tomorrow and that starting tomorrow I would be on a "reading elective." At this time, my PD asked me if there was anything going on personally that would be affecting my performance and, though it was painful to reveal personal issues to someone I do not know personally, I did disclose what I was going through personally at this time.

Reading this, I worry that you have a communication issue. Although what you say/communicate is important, how it's said is also vital. When I see descriptions like the above, I worry that you think you're communicating one thing, but people are hearing something else. This isn't based on any real evidence, since all I have is your description.

A reading elective that lasts for months is really bad news. They can't give you clinical training credit for any of that. I think they should have been more up front with you about the situation, but it sounds like the problems (from their viewpoint) are much more serious than you seem to think.

Soon after, I meet with the GME director and my PD. Again, I ask my PD if I could have more clarification as to how this decision was made and what allegations/ what data supports this. My GME director (who is not in our department/ relying solely on the info provided by my PD) suggests that a unilateral decision cannot be made-- and that my PD must meet with the clinical competency committee and we will reconvene our meeting in two weeks. At the next meeting, my PD plainly reports that the "CCC has decided to not renew my contract" and reports that he thinks it would be in my best interest to apply for disability and "take time off to care for myself." The GME director says that we will reconvene in another week after I have enough time to look over disability paperwork and "options for moving forward will be discussed at the next meeting." During this meeting, I told my PD I have been meeting with previous attendings and peers to see what possible extra/hidden evaluations are out there and uncovered nothing-- to which I received a vague umbrella answer that "there was enough data to make this decision." My PD also stated that "it would be fruitless and an unproductive use of my time" to submit an Appeal to the GME Grievances committee because patient safety is the main concern. Also, my GME director has repeatedly stated during our meetings that "this is not disciplinary action" and that there is no question of being "terminated".

GME is correct this is supposed to be a decision by the whole CCC, not just the PD. In reality, the CCC usually just does what the PD wants so it's not much of a protection. GME will only assess whether the process followed the rules, they leave it up to programs to decide whether your clinical skills are adequate to continue.

Whether or not this counts as "disciplinary action" depends on your local policies. We consider non-renewal of a contract mid training to be a dsciplinary issue, and we also only allow an appeal/grievance process for disciplinary issues. But that's local to us. If you want to keep your legal options open, you must pursue an appeal -- if offered one and you don't take it, usually the courts will consider that you abandoned your claim (you would need to prove that the appeal was a guaranteed sham to bypass it).

As has already been mentioned, your time at this program is over no matter what. Your best outcome is to get as good a recommendation as possible. I agree with you that sitting out a year makes no sense -- if this amount of time away from clinical work hasn't "fixed" the issue, more time isn't either.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users
OP, weren't you supposed to meet with GME and your PD yesterday? What did you decide to do?
 
Wow, thank you guys so much for the responses. For months now the details of this situation have remained between my PD and I, so the attendings I have worked with and my co-workers haven't been able to really give any guidance or recommendations (and I don't blame them). It just really helps having another pair of eyes and ears in a situation like this and I appreciate it you guys reading the mini-novel I wrote.

I should have added: since my last meeting with my PD and GME director-- I was told that "my homework" was to complete the disability paperwork and speak to the disabilities office about applying for FMLA or considering a leave of absence due to medical reasons. I was also sent a "reminder" e-mail about having my provider fill out his end of the disability paperwork and get that in asap. Since then, I also spoke with an admin in our GME regarding the appeals/grievances process. Though my PD emphasized in our last meeting that the appeals process would be non-productive in my situation because patient safety trumps most everything. The GME admin reviewed the situation and process and told me I could still appeal (regardless of my PD's recommendation). However, I think my time is better spent focusing on my next steps rather than trying to appeal/go against my PD and create any negative tension. I also understand that my PD is extremely busy with recruitment/MATCH day coming up, as well as a lot of internal issues our program is having with a TON of attendings leaving and being replaced with locums. He's been wearing many hats for the last few months so I don't want to add another process that he already said would be fruitless.

I had my meeting with GME and my PD yesterday morning and I started off by explaining that I investigated this further (leaving out any mention of an attorney) and don't think "declaring" a disability is in my best interest right now, as I am doing everything recommended in terms of treatment. They didn't harp on the disability/FMLA and we moved on to discuss the options. I also told them that I took the step of seeing a Neurocognitive Psychologist and what he relayed to me about the lack of indications for further testing and needing to re-assess the tests administered on the initial FFD.

Next, they said it would be in my best interest to resign-- because the testing from the FFD report confirmed their concern of patient safety. I could tell that my GME Director (not being a part of my program/ not knowing the details of the allegations) felt a bit unsure about this and he went out of his way to say he would put a letter in my file immediately recommending me to other programs and he stated this letter would make sure to address what did NOT lead to me resigning (for example: he said he would emphasize that it was not related to any disciplinary action and that it was not due to substance abuse, etc.) He said he applauded me for seeking out the further neurocognitive testing and said that the FFD report's cognitive evaluation is not something that can't be refuted or disproved. My program director also added that he would write a recommendation that would very succinct in regards to why I resigned and will not go any further than saying it was my decision based on medical needs. I told them I really appreciated hearing this from them and I also spit up the courage to tell them I would be applying to any PGY-2 position that becomes open in the next few weeks/months and would re-start my PGY-2 year somewhere else, hoping that I don't have to sit out an additional year after already having spent so much time away. I didn't get any pushback on this. We discussed how I could use my remaining "leave days" to take care of what I need to/ write my resignation letter and discussed some specifics about obtaining health insurance for the remaining months that I am not employed.

Even though I left the meeting with absolutely no feeling in my arms and legs (not knowing how I'm going to pay my rent the next few months/ having less than a month's notice to get my financial situation figured out)-- I think everything will be okay if I just start applying now and hope for the best. The bright side is that they cleared up my fear of leaving without any rec letters/or negative rec letters.

One thing I always admired about medicine (and took for granted) was that up until this point, I have had control over my career and things have been fair. Unlike some other careers, I never felt like it was a subjective popularity contest/ never felt like I had to sell myself/do any 'networking' to prove that I am capable. The effort you put in is equal to what you get out of it.
You work hard in college/ do well on the MCAT/ shadow docs, get pre-med experience--> you get into medical school.
You work hard in medical school/ do well on Step 1 and Step 2/ put your head down and prove yourself on clinical rotations--> You get into residency (and with a little luck, you get your top choice)
I was extremely naive to think that the residency experience would be the same and really regret not standing up for myself early on in this situation. Hopefully in a few years, I look back at this as a small blip in my career.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Wow, thank you guys so much for the responses. For months now the details of this situation have remained between my PD and I, so the attendings I have worked with and my co-workers haven't been able to really give any guidance or recommendations (and I don't blame them). It just really helps having another pair of eyes and ears in a situation like this and I appreciate it you guys reading the mini-novel I wrote.

I should have added: since my last meeting with my PD and GME director-- I was told that "my homework" was to complete the disability paperwork and speak to the disabilities office about applying for FMLA or considering a leave of absence due to medical reasons. I was also sent a "reminder" e-mail about having my provider fill out his end of the disability paperwork and get that in asap.

I had my meeting with GME and my PD yesterday morning and I started off by explaining that I investigated this further (leaving out any mention of an attorney) and don't think "declaring" a disability is in my best interest right now, as I am doing everything recommended in terms of treatment. They didn't harp on the disability/FMLA and we moved on to discuss the options. I also told them that I took the step of seeing a Neurocognitive Psychologist and what he relayed to me about the lack of indications for further testing and needing to re-assess the tests administered on the initial FFD.

Next, they said it would be in my best interest to resign-- because the testing from the FFD report confirmed their concern of patient safety. I could tell that my GME Director (not being a part of my program/ not knowing the details of the allegations) felt a bit unsure about this and he went out of his way to say he would put a letter in my file immediately recommending me to other programs and he stated this letter would make sure to address what did NOT lead to me resigning (for example: he said he would emphasize that it was not related to any disciplinary action and that it was not due to substance abuse, etc.) He said he applauded me for seeking out the further neurocognitive testing and said that the FFD report's cognitive evaluation is not something that can't be refuted or disproved. My program director also added that he would write a recommendation that would very succinct in regards to why I resigned and will not go any further than saying it was my decision based on medical needs. I told them I really appreciated hearing this from them and I also spit up the courage to tell them I would be applying to any PGY-2 position that becomes open in the next few weeks/months and would re-start my PGY-2 year somewhere else, hoping that I don't have to sit out an additional year after already having spent so much time away. I didn't get any pushback on this. We discussed how I could use my remaining "leave days" to take care of what I need to/ write my resignation letter and discussed some specifics about obtaining health insurance for the remaining months that I am not employed.

Even though I left the meeting with absolutely no feeling in my arms and legs (not knowing how I'm going to pay my rent the next few months/ having less than a month's notice to get my financial situation figured out)-- I think everything will be okay if I just start applying now and hope for the best. The bright side is that they cleared up my fear of leaving without any rec letters/or negative rec letters.

One thing I always admired about medicine (and took for granted) was that up until this point, I have had control over my career and things have been fair. Unlike some other careers, I never felt like it was a subjective popularity contest/ never felt like I had to sell myself/do any 'networking' to prove that I am capable. I effort you put in is equal to what you get out of it.
You work hard in college/ do well on the MCAT/ shadow docs, get pre-med experience--> you get into medical school.
You work hard in medical school/ do well on Step 1 and Step 2/ put your head down and prove yourself on clinical rotations--> You get into residency (and with a little luck, you get your top choice)
I was extremely naive to think that the residency experience would be the same and really regret not standing up for myself early on in this situation. Hopefully in a few years, I look back at this as a small blip in my career.

Was the whole patient safety thing the patient that passed? That seems a bit like BS. We've had residents who were on call/were responsible for patients and to my knowledge, there were 3 patients that passed while residents were on call - but nothing ever came of it. So that seems like an excuse. Clearly there is something else going on here.

I'm sorry this happened. Hopefully you get credit and can successfully get a PGY-2 position. While I resigned bc I couldn't stand my initial advanced position, sometiems changing residency places is the best thing that can happen if you simply don't fit in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Wow, thank you guys so much for the responses. For months now the details of this situation have remained between my PD and I, so the attendings I have worked with and my co-workers haven't been able to really give any guidance or recommendations (and I don't blame them). It just really helps having another pair of eyes and ears in a situation like this and I appreciate it you guys reading the mini-novel I wrote.

I should have added: since my last meeting with my PD and GME director-- I was told that "my homework" was to complete the disability paperwork and speak to the disabilities office about applying for FMLA or considering a leave of absence due to medical reasons. I was also sent a "reminder" e-mail about having my provider fill out his end of the disability paperwork and get that in asap.

I had my meeting with GME and my PD yesterday morning and I started off by explaining that I investigated this further (leaving out any mention of an attorney) and don't think "declaring" a disability is in my best interest right now, as I am doing everything recommended in terms of treatment. They didn't harp on the disability/FMLA and we moved on to discuss the options. I also told them that I took the step of seeing a Neurocognitive Psychologist and what he relayed to me about the lack of indications for further testing and needing to re-assess the tests administered on the initial FFD.

Next, they said it would be in my best interest to resign-- because the testing from the FFD report confirmed their concern of patient safety. I could tell that my GME Director (not being a part of my program/ not knowing the details of the allegations) felt a bit unsure about this and he went out of his way to say he would put a letter in my file immediately recommending me to other programs and he stated this letter would make sure to address what did NOT lead to me resigning (for example: he said he would emphasize that it was not related to any disciplinary action and that it was not due to substance abuse, etc.) He said he applauded me for seeking out the further neurocognitive testing and said that the FFD report's cognitive evaluation is not something that can't be refuted or disproved. My program director also added that he would write a recommendation that would very succinct in regards to why I resigned and will not go any further than saying it was my decision based on medical needs. I told them I really appreciated hearing this from them and I also spit up the courage to tell them I would be applying to any PGY-2 position that becomes open in the next few weeks/months and would re-start my PGY-2 year somewhere else, hoping that I don't have to sit out an additional year after already having spent so much time away. I didn't get any pushback on this. We discussed how I could use my remaining "leave days" to take care of what I need to/ write my resignation letter and discussed some specifics about obtaining health insurance for the remaining months that I am not employed.

Even though I left the meeting with absolutely no feeling in my arms and legs (not knowing how I'm going to pay my rent the next few months/ having less than a month's notice to get my financial situation figured out)-- I think everything will be okay if I just start applying now and hope for the best. The bright side is that they cleared up my fear of leaving without any rec letters/or negative rec letters.

One thing I always admired about medicine (and took for granted) was that up until this point, I have had control over my career and things have been fair. Unlike some other careers, I never felt like it was a subjective popularity contest/ never felt like I had to sell myself/do any 'networking' to prove that I am capable. I effort you put in is equal to what you get out of it.
You work hard in college/ do well on the MCAT/ shadow docs, get pre-med experience--> you get into medical school.
You work hard in medical school/ do well on Step 1 and Step 2/ put your head down and prove yourself on clinical rotations--> You get into residency (and with a little luck, you get your top choice)
I was extremely naive to think that the residency experience would be the same and really regret not standing up for myself early on in this situation. Hopefully in a few years, I look back at this as a small blip in my career.

At least you were able to walk away from the meeting with their willingness to write decent letters. This is a positive!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Dude you should have asked that you be allowed to finish your PGY-2 year instead of leaving pre-maturely. Ive known people to get their contract non-renewed and still be able to finish PGY-2 year. And that got credit for that year.
 
Dude you should have asked that you be allowed to finish your PGY-2 year instead of leaving pre-maturely. Ive known people to get their contract non-renewed and still be able to finish PGY-2 year. And that got credit for that year.

He was on reading elective for months on end with no clinical activity. How would they credit him the year?
 
He was on reading elective for months on end with no clinical activity. How would they credit him the year?
You are right. His program really shafted him. I never heard of a program actually doing that before
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 1 user
Was the whole patient safety thing the patient that passed? That seems a bit like BS. We've had residents who were on call/were responsible for patients and to my knowledge, there were 3 patients that passed while residents were on call - but nothing ever came of it. So that seems like an excuse. Clearly there is something else going on here.

I'm sorry this happened. Hopefully you get credit and can successfully get a PGY-2 position. While I resigned bc I couldn't stand my initial advanced position, sometiems changing residency places is the best thing that can happen if you simply don't fit in there.

The issue with the patient that passed was a non-issue throughout the rotation and I found out a month later (in the eval) about my attending's concern. She reported in the comments section to expand on 'what I could work on':

She wrote: "Dr. X should work on closed-loop communication [I don't doubt this or disagree-- I'm realizing I suck as a communicator]. For example, one afternoon I asked Dr. X to check-in on this patient and I am uncertain if she did from the report she gave the next morning."
-- I am not sure if this was an after-thought when reviewing how our patient passed, but I really wish she had brought this up before putting it in an evaluation because it implies dishonesty. I would have cleared up any doubt by showing her the text messages from that evening that me and her exchanged when I asked her if I should consult OMFS surgery based on what the patient looked like. I would have also showed her the texts from that evening between me and the OMFS resident detailing why I consulted them and what physical exam findings made it necessary for them to come see the patient. I remember this situation specifically because I stayed a lot later that evening waiting on OMFS to show up so I could speak to them in person about their recommendations to relay them to her.
This is the incident my program director used as an example of dishonesty and patient safety being affected because of it. When I showed my program director the text messages, on top of being told I was making excuses, he also looked at me blankly in the face and said "Are you telling me your attending is lying? Are you calling her a liar?" This incident is what made me just "put my head down and say yes sir" because there was never a right answer. It labeled me as dishonest and that's not taken lightly in medicine and it's hard to come back from that, even if it was a misunderstanding/something that could've easily been cleared up.
 
Last edited:
You are right. His program really shafted him. I never heard of a program actually doing that before
I don't think my program had "it out for me" and and knowingly planned for me to sit out for 8 months-- September and the first week of October went by and my PD said the hurricane prep and hurricane clean up slowed things down (My state was projected to be hit by a "massive hurricane" that ended up not hitting-- but obviously, the hospitals and businesses had to prepare for the worst.) i thought this was fair and I stayed patient. My scheduling chief also told me she was in communication with my PD and he told her that I would be back on service after we figure some things out. October went by and my PD apologized for how long "the process" was taking because of changes in our program/losses of attendings and because recruitment had begun. In November he finally said the GME was "setting up the FFD" and the new billing department was stalling the process because the FFD evaluator was being paid by the hospital's GME funds and not the program's fund. I was told to be patient and that it was out of the program's hands and into GME's. Finally, 6 weeks later in Mid-December, the GME set up the FFD and I completed all 4 days within a week.

On top of this, I was told to meet with my faculty attending mentor weekly. She also doubled-down on continuing to be patient and to trust that the program had my best interest in mind and that "these things take time." My faculty mentor was just as shocked as I was months later to read the email saying I wasn't going to come back.

@Eilat87
 
Last edited:
To properly fire a resident they have to go through all the procedures. As soon as they recommended therapy, FFD and put you on remediation, the decision was already made to give you the boot eventually. They are just protecting themselves from a lawsuit.

My advice is to get a letter from your program director and reapply in the match or try to transfer. There is nothing left to salvage at your program.


Exactly. Also the CCC is a joke, most of the time they take the PD at his word and vote accordingly. It gives this veneer of fairness.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Exactly. Also the CCC is a joke, most of the time they take the PD at his word and vote accordingly. It gives this veneer of fairness.

The CCC is a joke and honestly it's just a way for a program to either keep residents they like or get rid of residents they don't like. We had one faculty member on our CCC committee who was a jack ass tyrant, POS - we all despised him, he eventually ended up getting canned and kicked out of the program. But he used to frequently try to screw over residents he didn't like. Ultimately as one faculty member said, well it's really the PD's decision as to what we do in so many words...

Also a lot of the "milestones" are a joke - I remember the nursing 360 evals would be a way for the nursing staff to b*** about residents they didn't like - complain about how long it would take them to answer a page, or one of the commented that my pants were "wrinkled" - i will never forget that - i actually had to sit down with my mentor who was a witch to put it midly and discuss my wrinkled pants. I was like what the heck? is this serious?

So CCC is something that should be done away with in my opinion. Doesn't serve any real purpose.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 5 users
You are right. His program really shafted him. I never heard of a program actually doing that before

I don't even know how they can justify that - their decision, actions or whatever should have taken a month at most - either get rid of him or let him do some sort of remediation. technically you can't fire a resident without allowing them to do remediation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Wow, thank you guys so much for the responses. For months now the details of this situation have remained between my PD and I, so the attendings I have worked with and my co-workers haven't been able to really give any guidance or recommendations (and I don't blame them). It just really helps having another pair of eyes and ears in a situation like this and I appreciate it you guys reading the mini-novel I wrote.

I should have added: since my last meeting with my PD and GME director-- I was told that "my homework" was to complete the disability paperwork and speak to the disabilities office about applying for FMLA or considering a leave of absence due to medical reasons. I was also sent a "reminder" e-mail about having my provider fill out his end of the disability paperwork and get that in asap. Since then, I also spoke with an admin in our GME regarding the appeals/grievances process. Though my PD emphasized in our last meeting that the appeals process would be non-productive in my situation because patient safety trumps most everything. The GME admin reviewed the situation and process and told me I could still appeal (regardless of my PD's recommendation). However, I think my time is better spent focusing on my next steps rather than trying to appeal/go against my PD and create any negative tension. I also understand that my PD is extremely busy with recruitment/MATCH day coming up, as well as a lot of internal issues our program is having with a TON of attendings leaving and being replaced with locums. He's been wearing many hats for the last few months so I don't want to add another process that he already said would be fruitless.

I had my meeting with GME and my PD yesterday morning and I started off by explaining that I investigated this further (leaving out any mention of an attorney) and don't think "declaring" a disability is in my best interest right now, as I am doing everything recommended in terms of treatment. They didn't harp on the disability/FMLA and we moved on to discuss the options. I also told them that I took the step of seeing a Neurocognitive Psychologist and what he relayed to me about the lack of indications for further testing and needing to re-assess the tests administered on the initial FFD.

Next, they said it would be in my best interest to resign-- because the testing from the FFD report confirmed their concern of patient safety. I could tell that my GME Director (not being a part of my program/ not knowing the details of the allegations) felt a bit unsure about this and he went out of his way to say he would put a letter in my file immediately recommending me to other programs and he stated this letter would make sure to address what did NOT lead to me resigning (for example: he said he would emphasize that it was not related to any disciplinary action and that it was not due to substance abuse, etc.) He said he applauded me for seeking out the further neurocognitive testing and said that the FFD report's cognitive evaluation is not something that can't be refuted or disproved. My program director also added that he would write a recommendation that would very succinct in regards to why I resigned and will not go any further than saying it was my decision based on medical needs. I told them I really appreciated hearing this from them and I also spit up the courage to tell them I would be applying to any PGY-2 position that becomes open in the next few weeks/months and would re-start my PGY-2 year somewhere else, hoping that I don't have to sit out an additional year after already having spent so much time away. I didn't get any pushback on this. We discussed how I could use my remaining "leave days" to take care of what I need to/ write my resignation letter and discussed some specifics about obtaining health insurance for the remaining months that I am not employed.

Even though I left the meeting with absolutely no feeling in my arms and legs (not knowing how I'm going to pay my rent the next few months/ having less than a month's notice to get my financial situation figured out)-- I think everything will be okay if I just start applying now and hope for the best. The bright side is that they cleared up my fear of leaving without any rec letters/or negative rec letters.

One thing I always admired about medicine (and took for granted) was that up until this point, I have had control over my career and things have been fair. Unlike some other careers, I never felt like it was a subjective popularity contest/ never felt like I had to sell myself/do any 'networking' to prove that I am capable. The effort you put in is equal to what you get out of it.
You work hard in college/ do well on the MCAT/ shadow docs, get pre-med experience--> you get into medical school.
You work hard in medical school/ do well on Step 1 and Step 2/ put your head down and prove yourself on clinical rotations--> You get into residency (and with a little luck, you get your top choice)
I was extremely naive to think that the residency experience would be the same and really regret not standing up for myself early on in this situation. Hopefully in a few years, I look back at this as a small blip in my career.

You should seek our attendings that you trust and feel can give you positive letters. Talk with them and see if they would feel comfortable with writing you positive letters to support your goals. You will need that going forward and the sooner you can secure it, the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You should seek our attendings that you trust and feel can give you positive letters. Talk with them and see if they would feel comfortable with writing you positive letters to support your goals. You will need that going forward and the sooner you can secure it, the better.

Sorry man but I'm still wondering how your avatar does the vibrating orange thing? the vibrating oranges are my fav of this entire forum!
 
The CCC is a joke and honestly it's just a way for a program to either keep residents they like or get rid of residents they don't like. We had one faculty member on our CCC committee who was a jack ass tyrant, POS - we all despised him, he eventually ended up getting canned and kicked out of the program. But he used to frequently try to screw over residents he didn't like. Ultimately as one faculty member said, well it's really the PD's decision as to what we do in so many words...

Also a lot of the "milestones" are a joke - I remember the nursing 360 evals would be a way for the nursing staff to b*** about residents they didn't like - complain about how long it would take them to answer a page, or one of the commented that my pants were "wrinkled" - i will never forget that - i actually had to sit down with my mentor who was a witch to put it midly and discuss my wrinkled pants. I was like what the heck? is this serious?

So CCC is something that should be done away with in my opinion. Doesn't serve any real purpose.

It's funny that you mention that. In the FFD evaluation report, my PD was quoted to say that he received an evaluation that noted "inappropriate attire." As a woman, I don't take this lightly because most people would assume it meant provocative/ promiscuous clothing. This could not be further from my attire at the hospital/ in clinic. So I did some investigating and there was an evaluation from one of my favorite attendings who left me a great evaluation for the month but under the section that said "Things that can be improved", he wrote "Dr. X wears workout-type jackets on top of her scrubs."

However, the FFD doesn't give any context to this. If I was an outside party reading the report, I, too, would assume "inappropriate attire" was a professionalism issue with inappropriate/provocative attire.

Individually, remarks like this do not add up to anything and it would be petty to argue them with the "he said/she said" argument. However, I never expected them to add up and amount to a situation like this.
 
It's funny that you mention that. In the FFD evaluation report, my PD was quoted to say that he received an evaluation that noted "inappropriate attire." As a woman, I don't take this lightly because most people would assume it meant provocative/ promiscuous clothing. This could not be further from my attire at the hospital/ in clinic. So I did some investigating and there was an evaluation from one of my favorite attendings who left me a great evaluation for the month but under the section that said "Things that can be improved", he wrote "Dr. X wears workout-type jackets on top of her scrubs."

However, the FFD doesn't give any context to this. If I was an outside party reading the report, I, too, would assume "inappropriate attire" was a professionalism issue with inappropriate/provocative attire.

Individually, remarks like this do not add up to anything and it would be petty to argue them with the "he said/she said" argument. However, I never expected them to add up and amount to a situation like this.

As I mentioned, I literally had to sit down with my "mentor" who was a joke to discuss my "wrinkled pants" - I kid you not. CCC is a freaking joke and the evaluations are a joke. Evals should be done by faculty only. Nurses have no one other than residents to try to take out their frustrations on and do it frequently. Same with peer evals - they are a pissing match. Residents should not be evaluating other residents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Next, they said it would be in my best interest to resign-- because the testing from the FFD report confirmed their concern of patient safety. I could tell that my GME Director (not being a part of my program/ not knowing the details of the allegations) felt a bit unsure about this and he went out of his way to say he would put a letter in my file immediately recommending me to other programs and he stated this letter would make sure to address what did NOT lead to me resigning (for example: he said he would emphasize that it was not related to any disciplinary action and that it was not due to substance abuse, etc.)

...

The bright side is that they cleared up my fear of leaving without any rec letters/or negative rec letters.
Sorry to bring this up... but did your PD say anything about writing you a letter going forward? Generally that's who prospective programs would want to hear from, not some GME director who, as you said, knows nothing about you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It's funny that you mention that. In the FFD evaluation report, my PD was quoted to say that he received an evaluation that noted "inappropriate attire." As a woman, I don't take this lightly because most people would assume it meant provocative/ promiscuous clothing. This could not be further from my attire at the hospital/ in clinic. So I did some investigating and there was an evaluation from one of my favorite attendings who left me a great evaluation for the month but under the section that said "Things that can be improved", he wrote "Dr. X wears workout-type jackets on top of her scrubs."

However, the FFD doesn't give any context to this. If I was an outside party reading the report, I, too, would assume "inappropriate attire" was a professionalism issue with inappropriate/provocative attire.

Individually, remarks like this do not add up to anything and it would be petty to argue them with the "he said/she said" argument. However, I never expected them to add up and amount to a situation like this.
“Work out type jacket” ? Come on man, wtf. I don’t care what you wear as long as you are in good hygiene. That comment is BS and it just underlined a malignant group of people who claim they truly have your best interest. Now you have to ask for good recs, will you see or read what’s in those letters ?
Hey, doc, I hope you get the letters you need, apply and move on to another program. Only you truly know your deficits, hence make sure you honestly address them as you move on. Remember, you’ve got to also persevere, kiss as many asses as you can (i.e just smile and stay cool) until you are done with training. Tell yourself “I’ll be the best resident in my program”, not because you are competing with others but because after this ordeal you are coming in with vengeance so to speak.

As you advance in your career, don’t forget to reach out to your juniors. All attending a where once Interns/residents and they wouldn’t like to be treated that way. For some reason, as soon as we become Attendings we become jerks forgetting we were once in that fox hole. The culture of medicine for residents is toxic (some places) and needs to change. You wonder why NPs and PA are flying up the charts and Residents are looked as ****? Well, it’s because we don’t take care of our own.

Good luck!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
From 30,000 feet, the question is about your performance. On one hand, it's possible that your performance is perfectly fine but that the program has decided that they just don't like/want you, or that some early evals have spiraled into closer scrutiny / unreasonable assessment / people just expect you to do poorly, so when something goes wrong there's no mercy. On the other hand, it's possible that your performance is very poor and you have no insight into your deficiencies and everything they are doing is completely warranted. In reality it's a spectrum, and you're somewhere between these two extremes. No one here can tell -- all we have is your description.

Reviewing the one event you documented above, sounds like the patient died and there were concerns that you didn't adequately address their issues, and concerns that you may have lied about things you did. Usually, if you work late caring for a patient, you document what you did -- that's just helpful for the people working overnight to know. It's possible that people expected you to alert someone to the patient's worsening clinical picture and you didn't. Again, impossible to tell from here.

From a more practical standpoint, you're making them very happy. Regardless of where you are on that spectrum, they want you gone. The best thing that can happen, from their standpoint, is you resigning. If you resign there is no messy appeal, and you can't pursue any legal action. You resigned, it was your choice.

The second best thing that could happen, from their perspective, is you putting yourself on disability. You'd have declared yourself "too sick to work" with no way to get any better. Now it's not GME or your PD's problem any more -- it's an HR problem. They pay you short term disability until the end of the year, and then you're gone. Again, no appeal, no lawsuit possible.

So it's no surprise (to me) that you're telling us this meeting went well. They were thrilled. If your goal is to make them happy, then you've done the right thing.

Now for the bad news: although this is the best thing for them, it may be the worst thing for you.

A letter from the GME director is useless. No one will care. The letter you need is from your PD. And if you resign, and then ask for a letter, they can write absolutely anything they want. There would be nothing you could do about it at all. Their promise of some sort of positive letter could be "ClearEyesFullHeart was a resident in our program from XXX to XXX and resigned due to medical reasons" and that's it. They will have all the cards, you will have nothing.

What you could do is ask for the letter before resigning. That way, you'll know what they will be saying about you before you decide whether to just go off into the sunset. If you do this, one of two things will happen: They might happily write you the letter and give you a copy. If it looks fair (it won't say you were the best resident ever), then you resign and move on.

Or, they will make excuses why they can't do this. They will say they are too busy and can't do it before the timeline of your resignation. This is BS of course -- there's nothing to do while we are waiting for match results. Or they will say that they can't show it to you because it's a letter of recommendation. This is also BS, because it isn't -- it's a letter summarizing your performance in the program, and ACGME guidelines usually require that these be shared with residents. Or they will say that they can't write it until after you resign, because otherwise it might not be true. But that's BS again, because they absolutely can. Or, they will write it but not sign it until "after". Anyway, you get the picture.

And then, if the latter happens (which honestly sounds almost guaranted from how badly your program has dealt with this issue), you might decide not to resign and pursue the appeal.

If you have a lawyer, you should run this by them. In fact, if you have a lawyer and they didn't recommend it, I wonder if you have the right lawyer. There is no "right" answer here -- if you don't resign they will probably fire you and then chances of getting a good letter might be even worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18 users
So CCC is something that should be done away with in my opinion. Doesn't serve any real purpose.

Don't judge all CCCs by your experience. Sometimes they do their job. One of my med school classmates was in a program where he and the PD clashed since intern year. After PGY 3 year, he was about to be terminated and the CCC saved his ass. Had it not been for the faculty on the committee, he'd be gone.
 
Hi-- I am reaching out today after months of uncertainties and ultimately running out of any resources/outlets to provide any advice or guidance. I will try my best to keep this short but feel free to ask about any missing info/details as I don't have any intentions to hide anything. I am an American medical graduate currently in my PGY-2 year in a Psychiatry program. I passed Step 1 and Step 2 on first attempt and was in good standing throughout college and medical school (no disciplinary issues/ no failed clinical rotations) and matched at my top choice for residency programs.

Residency started off great with my first three clinical rotations ending with great evaluations from both attendings and peers. My 4th rotation, however, was an off-service internal medicine rotation at the VA and on Day 1 I knew it would be a challenge. I take full responsibility of my shortcomings this month including: disorganized and inefficient presentations/ general lack of medical knowledge (hadn't done IM since my 3rd year in med school)/ three occasions when I was the last to show up in the morning (leading to more disorganization.) However, my upper-level resident (a PGY-2) throughout this month made the environment even more uncomfortable, but as a new resident, I just assumed this was the culture of residency. Looking back, I do think his constant cursing at female nursing and social work staff and racially-inspired remarks ("Why did you choose to go into medicine when you could have worked at your dad's liquor store?"- I'm of SE Asian descent and this is a stereotype) made it even more tough to have any confidence in my work. Halfway through the month, I spoke with my PGY-2 resident to see what changes I could make and the last ~10 days of the rotation went smoothly.

However, after this rotation ended-- I voluntarily reached out to our Assistant Program Director and spoke with her about what I can do to "redeem" myself, as I fully expected to receive negative evaluations. Turned out I was correct-- my PGY-2 resident submitted an evaluation after my first 2 weeks into the rotation with remarks including "Resident is late/ unorganized/ questionable if she is pre-rounding on patients based on her presentations/ lack of medical knowledge/ resident is unavailable). His evaluation from this rotation encouraged me to make sure these things were corrected for my next internal medicine rotation. Additionally, his evaluation was submitted half-way through the rotation and he never submitted an updated evaluation after the conclusion of the rotation.

A few weeks later, my program director asked to meet with me about this negative evaluation and I assured him that I take full responsibility and that my current rotation was the complete opposite and going great.

Four rotations went by and my evaluations continued to be great. In April, I had my second internal medicine rotation and, this time, my PGY-2 upper level resident was a huge support system and I started the rotation telling him about how my first IM rotation went and how I would appreciate on-the-spot feedback throughout the rotation. I got through this rotation and did not have any problems and moved on to my next rotation. However, about a month later-- one of my IM attendings submitted an evaluation into the system (we did not meet for "feedback" or review at the end of the rotation) that noted 2 issues on the rotation, the first: she reported that on one afternoon, she asked me to see a patient (who was deteriorating and, unfortunately, passed away) and she is not sure if I did based on my report the next morning and the second: working on "closed loop communication" with consults. I was shocked to see the first issue, as not only did I see the patient, I also brought my medical student to see the patient and have text messages to my attending from that evening about the patient's condition and any changes in the plan she wanted to make. I reached out to this attending after reading this evaluation to set up a time to discuss these critiques and to clear any misunderstandings or miscommunication-- we went back and forth on finding a date that would work with us but ultimately did not end up meeting up.

My program director called me into his office again-- this time, to discuss this negative feedback and how he was seeing a "pattern" in these two negative evaluations. I tried to assure my PD that there must have been some miscommunication and that my attending never approached me about this during the rotation about this and, rather, gave positive reinforcement throughout the rotation. Additionally, my rotations before and after this rotation had great evaluations.

At this point, I felt like I was under a microscope for the next few rotations. I was hypervigilant about making a mistake and felt like any mistake or misstep would be reported immediately to my PD. I did a good job at concealing it for a few months-- however, during the first two rotations of my PGY-2 year, it had caught up with me and my anxious-nervousness definitely took away from my confidence and I was making errors because of it (taking on too many patients to prove myself/ ordering a wrong lab/ calling a patient by the wrong name after because the patient was switched overnight/ leaving details out of the plans in patient notes.) Additionally, I previously scheduled to take Step 3 one of my inpatient rotations-- but shortly after meeting with my PD-- I decided to delay it to my "night float" month a few months later due to not wanting to ask for time off soon to take this exam from an inpatient rotation/ not wanting my PD to think anything of it. Ultimately, this was a bad decision and taking a board exam during nightfloat was not setting me up for success-- I failed Step 3 (but re-took it within the next 3 months and passed!)

Two months into my PGY-2 year, my PD calls me into his office. Though there were about 10 positive evaluations from attendings that believed I was doing well, we focused on negative comments. I asked my program director which evaluations he was referring to and where this "pattern" was being seen-- and he reported that these evaluations are not documented, rather, they are comments that reached his desk through different platforms (word-of-mouth/ e-mails). When I asked for examples or which rotation they were referring to, my PD would make vague blanket statements regarding a pattern he was seeing and a "wealth of negative evaluations" that are not in the system that he could not share with me or show me. Because I am a very timid and shy person, I usually just "put my head down" and say yes sir and take responsibility. However, at one point, my PD accused me of being dishonest and that is when I defended myself, as I have never tried to deceive or be dishonest and was not going to accept being told I was. As soon as I started to show my PD the "paper trail" that would exonerate me from any accusation of dishonesty, he immediately got frustrated and told me not to return to my clinical rotation tomorrow and that starting tomorrow I would be on a "reading elective." At this time, my PD asked me if there was anything going on personally that would be affecting my performance and, though it was painful to reveal personal issues to someone I do not know personally, I did disclose what I was going through personally at this time.

I was started on the "reading elective" on September 1st. The only direction I was given from my PD was to "get therapy" (at our hospital's Employee Assistance Program) and to meet a faculty advisor weekly. I also was told to study for our inservice exam and to re-take Step 3. Shortly after, I re-took Step 3 and passed this time. I started therapy and changed my medication regimen for ADHD (I have been diagnosed and started medication in medical school).

The month of September passes and towards the end of every month my scheduling chief would report that she has "gotten no word" on whether I am back on schedule. Every two-three weeks, I would email my PD to give him an "update" and "check-in" regarding returning to clinical duties. I would get a vague response in an e-mail and my PD tells me that it would be best if I went through "Fitness for duty" testing with a forensic neuropsychologist to give them a better idea of what direction to go-- this FFD testing was completed by a professional that my PD knows well and who used to work for the hospital. I was told to be patient, continue therapy, continue meeting with my faculty advisor, and he would arrange for the FFD testing. September passed by, October passes by, November passes, and in December-- I finally meet with my PD and GME Director and we set up a plan for formal remediation: we sign a contract that includes completing the FFD testing, getting back on clinical rotations and highlighted the areas that would need to be performed and excelled at during this remediation time. I finally complete four days worth of FFD testing which included a full interview of early childhood/ adolescent years/ college/ medical school performance, as well as a myriad of personality testing, depression screenings, ADHD screening, and multiple cognitive exams. At the end of the testing, the evaluator reviewed the recommendations she made and we discussed certain goals and changes I could make, as well as accommodations I think would help in the clinical setting.

After receiving the recommendations, I made sure I started on each one of them to further show my program that I was determined to be back on service-- including paying for a ADHD therapist/ coach to meet with weekly, evaluation by a sleep specialist in case sleep was an issue, continuing to meet with my faculty advisor, continuing personal therapy, and working on my clinical knowledge. During this time, however, despite multiple requests via e-mail to meet with my PD to see when the formal remediation would begin/ return to clinical duties (as the FFD was complete and Step 3 was passed)-- I receive vague responses that the program is "working to meet with GME." During this time, I also reached out to my previous attendings from the off service rotations to see if maybe they were the source of "extra evaluations" that are not documented in the system and they all denied any contact with my PD or program.

December goes by, January goes by, and in mid-February, I finally get a less vague response from my program director. I get a long email from my PD saying I will not be returning to clinical duties because "the FFD confirmed our previous concerns and that nothing would change if I was given the chance to remediate in the clinical setting." As you can imagine, after all these months of being isolated without a formal plan and uncertainties, this e-mail crushed me. I called my program director and asked how this decision was made and on what basis and my program director asked why I was so surprised and that "I must have seen this coming"-- this is the opposite of what I believed was coming due to affirmations from my chief residents and from my faculty advisor that the program was working out details and being patient would be the best way to handle this situation. My PD apologized for the 7 months of uncertainty and reported that "it would be in my best interest to leave residency due to medical reasons or to apply for FMLA/ disability and take time off to take care of myself." At this point, I am very confused because the purpose of the last few months was to "work on myself." My PD tells me he feels "uncomfortable" releasing the FFD to me-- and rather, he would prefer to release it to a clinician, i.e. my psychiatrist. A week or two later, I review the FFD with my psychiatrist and speak to the evaluator to see where it was implied that changes could not be made-- she reported she did not make such claims but it was up to the program to interpret the findings from the FFD. The FFD basically showed that the testing revealed I truly do have ADHD, had an above average IQ, remote and distant memory and the two areas that were lacking were "visuo-tactile response time and auditory-visual response time." Interestingly enough, the FFD included only the evaluations in the computer system (that we all have access to" and the only two collateral interviews that were completed were from my program director (who I have NEVER worked with clinically) and one other attending.

Soon after, I meet with the GME director and my PD. Again, I ask my PD if I could have more clarification as to how this decision was made and what allegations/ what data supports this. My GME director (who is not in our department/ relying solely on the info provided by my PD) suggests that a unilateral decision cannot be made-- and that my PD must meet with the clinical competency committee and we will reconvene our meeting in two weeks. At the next meeting, my PD plainly reports that the "CCC has decided to not renew my contract" and reports that he thinks it would be in my best interest to apply for disability and "take time off to care for myself." The GME director says that we will reconvene in another week after I have enough time to look over disability paperwork and "options for moving forward will be discussed at the next meeting." During this meeting, I told my PD I have been meeting with previous attendings and peers to see what possible extra/hidden evaluations are out there and uncovered nothing-- to which I received a vague umbrella answer that "there was enough data to make this decision." My PD also stated that "it would be fruitless and an unproductive use of my time" to submit an Appeal to the GME Grievances committee because patient safety is the main concern. Also, my GME director has repeatedly stated during our meetings that "this is not disciplinary action" and that there is no question of being "terminated".

At this time, I feel extremely lost. I spoke with multiple attorneys who have advised me to not sign any disability paperwork, as there has been no trauma/ new injury that would cause me to be incapable of working and I have been receiving all the recommended treatment for ADHD (both medication management, therapy, etc.) I also met with another forensic neurocognitive psychologist (NOT affiliated with the hospital) and asked him to review the FFD and recommend any further cognitive testing (because at this point, I am starting to believe that maybe I truly do need to look further into this.) This neurocog psychologist actually laughed out loud and stated that there was absolutely no indication for any cognitive testing and stated that, after reviewing the FFD, he has some major concerns about the validity of the tests given, as well as the FFD being very inconclusive and leaving a lot of discretion for the reader to make assumptions.

At this point, I do not know what to do. I am meeting with GME and my program director tomorrow and do not know how to proceed. I am almost positive that if I refuse to sign paperwork claiming that I am disabled, they will terminate me on the spot (or I can resign, whichever.) Does anyone have any guidance?

Lastly, I am not denying that I struggled during some rotations. I just wish I was told during the problem rotations of what was being perceived as deficient to give me the opportunity to make changes.
 
I am so sorry on your situation. I am here just to let you know that my heart and prayers are with you.
Been there not long time ago , I can understand the pain and missery.
Residency was brutal, I am glad I made it alive.

CCC is a joke in my eyes too, malignant attendings exists everywhere who love to play with emotions of naïve interns and residents.
Connections make a HUGE difference , Try to get a neutral letter from your PD and move on .
Very Good Luck!!.
 
Don't judge all CCCs by your experience. Sometimes they do their job. One of my med school classmates was in a program where he and the PD clashed since intern year. After PGY 3 year, he was about to be terminated and the CCC saved his ass. Had it not been for the faculty on the committee, he'd be gone.
Damn! How bad can someone be to want to fire them when they’ve already been in the program for 3 years. I don’t k ow the story but again, this is bs on all level. Can’t we support each other and let residents go be the doctors they set out to be. We are here talking about shortage of physicians and the explosion of midlevels. Smh.
 
Damn! How bad can someone be to want to fire them when they’ve already been in the program for 3 years. I don’t k ow the story but again, this is bs on all level. Can’t we support each other and let residents go be the doctors they set out to be. We are here talking about shortage of physicians and the explosion of midlevels. Smh.

Meh, I don't know. There are some people who shouldn't be doctors and should have been stopped long before residency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Meh, I don't know. There are some people who shouldn't be doctors and should have been stopped long before residency.
If people have some personality flaws, I agree... But I don't think we should agree when programs are terminating for frivolous things. There is a lot of anchoring bias in residency. Once you have issues with one attending, the words got out, and you will be under a microscope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
If people have some personality flaws, I agree... But I don't think we should agree when programs are terminating for frivolous things. There is a lot of anchoring bias in residency. Once you have issues with one attending, the words got out, and you will be under a microscope.

Yes, they are under a microscope and that sucks, but I haven't yet heard of a case where a resident was fired without cause. I have heard of some, like the OP, who don't know the cause though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Yes, they are under a microscope and that sucks, but I haven't yet heard of a case where a resident was fired without cause. I have heard of some, like the OP, who don't know the cause though.

Of course they won't fire someone without cause, but some causes are not big enough that warrant termination, especially in medicine where the consequence is huge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Of course they won't fire someone without cause, but some causes are not big enough that warrant termination, especially in medicine where the consequence is huge.

Let me rephrase: I have yet to hear of a case where the cause would not be deemed appropriate by a majority of doctors even outside of academics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Let me rephrase: I have yet to hear of a case where the cause would not be deemed appropriate by a majority of doctors even outside of academics.

I have heard many cases where a resident was treated unfairly, targeted, and ultimately kicked out the program.


But then of course the real story comes out and it turns out that the resident was given numerous chances and couldn't get their **** together.


Kicking a resident out of a program is a LOT of extra work and no one wants to go through it unless they really feel like they have no choice.

Best example I've come across so far is Stephanie Waggel. Compare what she alleges (and got onto the news) and what the court transcripts say. Night and day.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 7 users
I have heard many cases where a resident was treated unfairly, targeted, and ultimately kicked out the program.


But then of course the real story comes out and it turns out that the resident was given numerous chances and couldn't get their **** together.


Kicking a resident out of a program is a LOT of extra work and no one wants to go through it unless they really feel like they have no choice.

Best example I've come across so far is Stephanie Waggel. Compare what she alleges (and got onto the news) and what the court transcripts say. Night and day.

@Mass Effect

@aProgDirector

I definitely understand where you're coming from-- from 30,000 ft away and no details on the actual issues that culminated to this point, I would be asking the same thing and assuming theres a large red flag that I'm leaving out. The purpose of me posting the situation was to see if the process was fair and if due process was given. I could've gone into the details of the certain issues pointed out in the FFD but it would turn into a petty "he said-she said" and didn't think that was the best use of my time. However, here are the highlights of my FFD if it gives you any more perspective on the situation:

(Keep in mind that I was taken off of service on September 1st-- was told many times by my scheduling chief that my PD planned to bring me back on service but was "working it out with GME." After months of being told to stay patient/ "work on myself"/ and basically isolated getting the run around from both my PD and GME about why scheduling a FFD took 4 months to schedule, I finally was scheduled for the FFD. At the time (being given EVERY indication that this FFD was for my benefit and for a deeper look into how to tailor therapy), I took it VERY seriously and was a bit too honest and had no idea that it would very soon be used against me. I should also stress that prior to the FFD report, I had an official meeting with the GME and my PD and we signed a remediation contract that CONFIRMED I would be back on clinical duty and in 4 months the progress would be evaluated again by GME. After another 6-8 weeks of waiting to "start" this plan (and my PD simply not answering my e-mails/ not returning any request to meet)-- I randomly received an email one morning stating that "the FFD confirmed his previous concerns" and that the remediation contract was dubbed NULL due to the findings of the FFD. The forensic neuropsychologist who conducted the FFD (a previous employee and faculty member at the hospital and part of my program) had the duty to do a full forensic evaluation including conducting interviews with attendings I have worked with, etc (this eval costs about $2200 even with insurance btw.) Instead of doing this, the only person interviewed was my PD-- someone I have spent absolutely no time with personally and have never worked with clinically.

For example, I volunteered to the evaluator that, as an intern, I would get to the hospital at 4:00 AM some mornings to make sure that every lab from the previous afternoon was ordered (because the nursing staff started to collect labs at 5 AM promptly and did not want my patients to be stuck twice/ or for the labs to not be reported at the same time as the others and not be ready by the time I presented at rounds.) It sounds a bit neurotic, I know, but after making the mistake of forgetting to order a lab during that first month of IM, I wanted to make sure that I double/triple checked my work when I could. Instead of reporting this like I stated, the report read this:

"Ingrained interpersonal communication and coping styles internalized in childhood have impacted her current communication and coping. For example, she states she routinely hid 'normal' activities from her father like staying up late on the family computer or attending high school football games, suffering from acute shame if found out, which involved a level of adaptive deception on her part; and she never communicated directly with him, but always through an intermediary (e.g. her mother). This learned interaction style has resulted in less than direct and forthright communication with others. It has adversely impacted patient care and can be perceived as willful deception at times, and has eroded trust. One example of this is is stating that she did something when she did not (ordering labs) in order to escape judgement (shame) in the moment and the associated anxiety. Another example is in December 2019 when her program director reported she signed into both didactic lectures when she only attended one. [Since Sep 2019 when I was put on this reading elective, my PD 'gave me permission' to attend weekly didactics for the first lecture only. Thus, I got nothing out of signing into both lectures and it was clearly an oversight/muscle memory from the last 12 months of signing both sheets.] Interpersonal therapy may serve to alter such style to more open, direct and reciprocal communication. Therefore, without significant and successful clinical intervention, Dr. XXX will likely not show an overall, sustained, and progress- forward improvement."

This evaluation was not an objective non-bias fitness-for-duty. Statements and conclusions made from cultural assumptions (i.e. a first generation Pakistani American 'hiding' normal activities from her father/going through her mother...something that I think a lot of children of strict immigrant parents can relate to) and tied to completely un-related to clinical competence/ clinical examples.

Another example used in this report is taking two sick days when I should have submitted 1 sick day and 1 vacation day (had an outpatient procedure on Thursday and went out of town on Friday [home].) Having 11 sick days and 14 vacation days available to me at that time (and only 4 more months to use all of them), it did not cross my mind that this would be used as an example of malicious dishonesty, as I was not going to get anywhere close to using all my sick and vacation leave days and did not have any reason to deceive.

Defending these offenses and the examples used in this FFD (and thus, as a tool used to change my career forever) is a mockery of the last 10 years of true hard work and struggle it took to get to this position.

So yes, kicking a resident out does take a lot of work. And in this situation, because they had no true clinical examples of why a resident should be terminated, they went the extra step of having a neuropsychologist make vague interpretations of normal, everyday behavior. Based on her findings, she could have easily found reason to propose that 1 + 1 is 3-- no matter how out of the box it is and the program would have still used the FDD as a "confirmation of their concerns."
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Damn! How bad can someone be to want to fire them when they’ve already been in the program for 3 years. I don’t k ow the story but again, this is bs on all level. Can’t we support each other and let residents go be the doctors they set out to be. We are here talking about shortage of physicians and the explosion of midlevels. Smh.
As I'm sure APD and other PD's will back up, sometimes it takes a while to gather enough reliable info and ensure that remediation is not going to be effective. It's overall better for the resident that they were given years of structured feedback and explicit help and not just fired. But when these stories are reported by the residents, you don't get all of that detail.
Another example used in this report is taking two sick days when I should have submitted 1 sick day and 1 vacation day (had an outpatient procedure on Thursday and went out of town on Friday [home].) Having 11 sick days and 14 vacation days available to me at that time (and only 4 more months to use all of them), it did not cross my mind that this would be used as an example of malicious dishonesty, as I was not going to get anywhere close to using all my sick and vacation leave days and did not have any reason to deceive.
This is exactly what that report is talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
@Mass Effect

@aProgDirector

I definitely understand where you're coming from-- from 30,000 ft away and no details on the actual issues that culminated to this point, I would be asking the same thing and assuming theres a large red flag that I'm leaving out. The purpose of me posting the situation was to see if the process was fair and if due process was given. I could've gone into the details of the certain issues pointed out in the FFD but it would turn into a petty "he said-she said" and didn't think that was the best use of my time. However, here are the highlights of my FFD if it gives you any more perspective on the situation:

(Keep in mind that I was taken off of service on September 1st-- was told many times by my scheduling chief that my PD planned to bring me back on service but was "working it out with GME." After months of being told to stay patient/ "work on myself"/ and basically isolated getting the run around from both my PD and GME about why scheduling a FFD took 4 months to schedule, I finally was scheduled for the FFD. At the time (being given EVERY indication that this FFD was for my benefit and for a deeper look into how to tailor therapy), I took it VERY seriously and was a bit too honest and had no idea that it would very soon be used against me. I should also stress that prior to the FFD report, I had an official meeting with the GME and my PD and we signed a remediation contract that CONFIRMED I would be back on clinical duty and in 4 months the progress would be evaluated again by GME. After another 6-8 weeks of waiting to "start" this plan (and my PD simply not answering my e-mails/ not returning any request to meet)-- I randomly received an email one morning stating that "the FFD confirmed his previous concerns" and that the remediation contract was dubbed NULL due to the findings of the FFD. The forensic neuropsychologist who conducted the FFD (a previous employee and faculty member at the hospital and part of my program) had the duty to do a full forensic evaluation including conducting interviews with attendings I have worked with, etc (this eval costs about $2200 even with insurance btw.) Instead of doing this, the only person interviewed was my PD-- someone I have spent absolutely no time with personally and have never worked with clinically.

For example, I volunteered to the evaluator that, as an intern, I would get to the hospital at 4:00 AM some mornings to make sure that every lab from the previous afternoon was ordered (because the nursing staff started to collect labs at 5 AM promptly and did not want my patients to be stuck twice/ or for the labs to not be reported at the same time as the others and not be ready by the time I presented at rounds.) It sounds a bit neurotic, I know, but after making the mistake of forgetting to order a lab during that first month of IM, I wanted to make sure that I double/triple checked my work when I could. Instead of reporting this like I stated, the report read this:

"Ingrained interpersonal communication and coping styles internalized in childhood have impacted her current communication and coping. For example, she states she routinely hid 'normal' activities from her father like staying up late on the family computer or attending high school football games, suffering from acute shame if found out, which involved a level of adaptive deception on her part; and she never communicated directly with him, but always through an intermediary (e.g. her mother). This learned interaction style has resulted in less than direct and forthright communication with others. It has adversely impacted patient care and can be perceived as willful deception at times, and has eroded trust. One example of this is is stating that she did something when she did not (ordering labs) in order to escape judgement (shame) in the moment and the associated anxiety. Another example is in December 2019 when her program director reported she signed into both didactic lectures when she only attended one. [Since Sep 2019 when I was put on this reading elective, my PD 'gave me permission' to attend weekly didactics for the first lecture only. Thus, I got nothing out of signing into both lectures and it was clearly an oversight/muscle memory from the last 12 months of signing both sheets.] Interpersonal therapy may serve to alter such style to more open, direct and reciprocal communication. Therefore, without significant and successful clinical intervention, Dr. XXX will likely not show an overall, sustained, and progress- forward improvement."

This evaluation was not an objective non-bias fitness-for-duty. Statements and conclusions made from cultural assumptions (i.e. a first generation Pakistani American 'hiding' normal activities from her father/going through her mother...something that I think a lot of children of strict immigrant parents can relate to) and tied to completely un-related to clinical competence/ clinical examples.

Another example used in this report is taking two sick days when I should have submitted 1 sick day and 1 vacation day (had an outpatient procedure on Thursday and went out of town on Friday [home].) Having 11 sick days and 14 vacation days available to me at that time (and only 4 more months to use all of them), it did not cross my mind that this would be used as an example of malicious dishonesty, as I was not going to get anywhere close to using all my sick and vacation leave days and did not have any reason to deceive.

Defending these offenses and the examples used in this FFD (and thus, as a tool used to change my career forever) is a mockery of the last 10 years of true hard work and struggle it took to get to this position.

So yes, kicking a resident out does take a lot of work. And in this situation, because they had no true clinical examples of why a resident should be terminated, they went the extra step of having a neuropsychologist make vague interpretations of normal, everyday behavior. Based on her findings, she could have easily found reason to propose that 1 + 1 is 3-- no matter how out of the box it is and the program would have still used the FDD as a "confirmation of their concerns."

Thank you for sharing this. I'd be interested to hear from @aProgDirector if this is what's typical of FFD evaluations? I think spilling childhood details into an employee document is a violation of significant magnitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Thank you for sharing this. I'd be interested to hear from @aProgDirector if this is what's typical of FFD evaluations? I think spilling childhood details into an employee document is a violation of significant magnitude.

Its also ridiculous, because it implies that she was unable to progress in any way based on actions in childhood, which I honestly would agree overlaps with almost every teenager in this society. Who hasn't done things as a teenager and not told a parent because they were worried about getting in trouble? Who hasn't told one parent something and not another as a child/teenager, because they knew the one parent would take it better? Its ridiculous, and I hate to be that guy, but probably based in a bit of xenophobia.

Hell my toddler daughter already knows that if she asks me for something she might get a better response than her mom.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
Wowza that FFD evaluation seems ridiculously over the top to me. Discussion of how kids hide stuff from their parents (like we haven't all done that) and how that relates to their failings as a medical doctor is completely inappropriate to me.

I would be super pissed if that is what 'confirmed' a PD's concerns and lead to termination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
OP probable pissed off a lot people in that program...
 
Top