I was reading a journal article about the WAIS and its theoretical frameworks. In the article in talks about how Wechsler looked at IQ as a unitary construct and, hence, the subtests on the WAIS are posited to measure g, but in different ways.
However, I also know that certain psychological tasks given to infants have been predictive of certain facets of IQ. For example, infants' visual attention and visual recognition memory is predictive of later verbal IQ (probably because they can remember vocab words better)
Looking at this finding, doesn't this disprove Wechsler's view of intelligence? In other words, if Wechlers view of IQ as a unitary construct were true/valid, wouldn't span of infant visual attention correlate highly with IQ as a whole rather than just one facet (vocabulary)?
However, I also know that certain psychological tasks given to infants have been predictive of certain facets of IQ. For example, infants' visual attention and visual recognition memory is predictive of later verbal IQ (probably because they can remember vocab words better)
Looking at this finding, doesn't this disprove Wechsler's view of intelligence? In other words, if Wechlers view of IQ as a unitary construct were true/valid, wouldn't span of infant visual attention correlate highly with IQ as a whole rather than just one facet (vocabulary)?