- Joined
- May 29, 2003
- Messages
- 518
- Reaction score
- 0
Let's say hypothethically, a 14 year old girl presents for the first time for a "routine eye examination". She has seen several community providers in the past 5-6 years for spectacle correction. She is asymptomatic and her personal and familial general and ophthalmic histories are unrelated.
Hypothetically, her examination shows that her IOP's are consistently in the high 20's either in mid-morning or mid afternoon over a 3-day period. Her optic nerve cupping is 0.95 in each eye with "bean pot" excavation. The neuro retinal rims are "thin". The pallor appears to be normal in each disc.
Threshold 24-2 shows arcuate scotomas superiorly and inferiorly in either eye with good gaze tracking and 0/11 fixation losses.
Clnical impression: Glaucoma
In this hypothetical case, a consulting comprehensive ophthalmologist has recommended a referral to a pediatric ophthalmologist rather than a glaucoma subspecialist. What are your thoughts and why would you choose one over the other?
Regards,
Richard
Hypothetically, her examination shows that her IOP's are consistently in the high 20's either in mid-morning or mid afternoon over a 3-day period. Her optic nerve cupping is 0.95 in each eye with "bean pot" excavation. The neuro retinal rims are "thin". The pallor appears to be normal in each disc.
Threshold 24-2 shows arcuate scotomas superiorly and inferiorly in either eye with good gaze tracking and 0/11 fixation losses.
Clnical impression: Glaucoma
In this hypothetical case, a consulting comprehensive ophthalmologist has recommended a referral to a pediatric ophthalmologist rather than a glaucoma subspecialist. What are your thoughts and why would you choose one over the other?
Regards,
Richard