- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
- Messages
- 314
- Reaction score
- 0
I saw 3 people on here were interested in behavoir and I was wondering more about this career. Any info?
Ok. Let me try again then--you want to know what behaviorists do once they have the credentials. I have only worked with one behaviorist. She did private practice consulting with clients as well as working with a shelter doing tempermant testing on shelter dogs. The private practice people are people with animals with separation anxiety, agression, house training issues, inter animal problems (between dogs, predatory etc). At lot of the private practice stuff is common sensical--ie you have a dog that bites if you try to take a toy from it. So train the dog to relinquish objects on command and manage dog to limit the objects dog may get. Owner would also need to work on general relationship with dog basic obedience/respect. Working in the shelter was interesting there is a detailed and specifically ordered series of tests that are done to see what a dogs reaction is to various stimuli--children, stranger approaching, someone yelling, someone messing with their food dish etc. I hope that at least partially answers the question. Behaviorists basically do a lot of people training!
I personally believe that vet schools should require more classes on behavior. Many many people came to the vet where I worked (or called) asking behavior related questions. More often then not, it was easy to see the vets did not know much about behavior.......they would just prescribe something, an injection, etc., to settle the animal down instead of attacking the behavior at the root.
Or if they don't know exactly how to change a behavior, maybe refer them to a behaviorist or someone who does know instead of just pumping them full of something.
No, you don't need a veterinary degree to be a behaviorist -
If a vet doesn't have the time to work with someone, then they need to refer them to someone who does and knows about behavior then, just like I said. Not just pump them full of a sedative because they "don't have time to deal with it." I udnerstand time is limited, but that doesn't mean they should cut corners just to make more money. But then again, I'm one of those people definitely not in this for the money.
You might need a veterinary degree to TREAT behavioral DISEASES, but not fix behavioral problems such as where the owner just needs to step up and be the pack leader. Amazing how much difference something like that can make. That and formal obedience training. A LOT of problem behaviors can stem from not being trained and not having a good leader.
Also two of the biggest reasons for patients leaving a practice are 1. the vet not giving their animal an injection and 2. wait time/rudeness. You can give them the best advice in the world about behavioral training, but studies have shown that clients won't think that you did anything unless you give them some type of medication.
Why don't you like Science diet and what do you feel are the better brands?
Just like you said, just cause they add extra stuff into their prescription diets is like adding pharmaceuticals into Burger King. So suddenly that's okay?
That's is why it's called a prescription diet - so a vet has to regulate what animals are on the food. So you're analogy really doesn't work there.
And to add while I can understand peoples opinions on Science Diet I think the "Burger King" argument is a silly one. What makes Burger King, and junk food in general, bad for people is that its high in fat, cholesterol, and calories. It will lead to obesity and an unhealthy heart. Science Diet on the other hand is 12.5% crude fat which is right on par with every other top food. Its also comparable in calories, protein, moisture, and fiber. The only difference is the perceived quality of ingredients as well as what Electrophile said with the use of BHT/BHA which are carcinogens.
Ah yes, but if you didn't try the different higher quality foods, then how dyou know these changes wouldn't have happened anyway and maybe even better, right?
This is a valid topic - I don't know why we tend to take it personally if we don't agree
This is a valid topic - I don't know why we tend to take it personally if we don't agree
I get my information from a nutrition specialist with dogS (not dog, and large breeds too) that live to be over 20 yrs old.
I had not one but TWO glorious long posts in response to various topics, but alas, Internet Explorer at the vet school computer lab decided to eat both of them. On the subject of long lived dogs on a non-kibble diet, behold Jerry, a 27 year old mix from Australia who eats kangaroo, rabbit, emu, and table scraps.
http://www.australianfauna.com/news/outbackmongrel.php
Ok, but I'm assuming these are outliers, no? Are there more than anecdotes to support the idea that dogs can normally live that long? Just because there have been people who have lived to 115 doesn't mean that we all can if we just do the "right" things.
Just because there have been people who have lived to 115 doesn't mean that we all can if we just do the "right" things.
Well, it's kind of like Pascal's wager on belief in God, if you are familiar with that...it's more "profitable" to believe and lose than not believe and really lose. Still...I have yet to hear anyone say that Science Diet is an evolutionarily appropriate food... *crickets chirping*