Attention all useless administrators...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

RustedFox

The mouse police never sleeps.
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
7,865
Reaction score
13,576
Screenshot_20221129-132848.png

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 19 users
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"

"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."

"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."

"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"

"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."

"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."

"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."

"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."

"Can we please just change the subject."

Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 15 users
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"

"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."

"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."

"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"

"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."

"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."

"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."

"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."

"Can we please just change the subject."

Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.

Jesus.
Going on diversion DOES WORK for the reasons that you mentioned (and I bolded/italicized above).
She sounds ostriched, move on.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"

"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."

"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."

"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"

"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."

"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."

"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."

"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."

"Can we please just change the subject."

Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
You gotta take one for the team and keep that one rolling for a while. Lol.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
You gotta take one for the team and keep that one rolling for a while. Lol.
Agreed this thread has potential but we definitely need it to keep going. Sorry OP

Personally I’m hoping she is some sort of mole that you can turn into a double agent
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
LOL @ "I know what it looks like down in the ER because I shadowed at my last job."

She knows, man. She KNOWS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"

"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."

"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."

"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"

"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."

"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."

"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."

"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."

"Can we please just change the subject."

Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.

Lol sorry it's funny and sad at the same time. You probably will need to find a new job, or go on a second date - which might need you eventually to you needing to find a new job regardless. But unfortunately this is the problem with non-MDs being in C-suite type jobs.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I would marry her

Then show up at your ED with a tophat, monocle and cape while wrapping myself around her arm and cackle as I whip your former colleagues with my cane.

Don't stand on the fence, ignore her or go full evil
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users
At least she showed her true colors right away and didn’t waste 6 months of your life
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
She’s right from a population health standpoint. Diversion doesn’t improve that. But it does give respite temporarily to a helplessly overwhelmed ED. Admin will never understand the stress of having a gross excess of patients that you are personally responsible for. They simply can’t understand it since they can’t live it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
She’s right from a population health standpoint. Diversion doesn’t improve that. But it does give respite temporarily to a helplessly overwhelmed ED. Admin will never understand the stress of having a gross excess of patients that you are personally responsible for. They simply can’t understand it since they can’t live it.
Agree. The only people who really understand what we do, is us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Wouldn't matter to me. I couldn't stand being around someone so ostriched.
BULLSHIIT

If she was hot and put out, you would all over that like bees around honey.
NO F'ING WAY THAT ISN'T TRUE. And if you claim that is true, amigo, you don't have two dangling organs between your legs producing testosterone.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3 users
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"

"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."

"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."

"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"

"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."

"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."

"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."

"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."

"Can we please just change the subject."

Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
What do you know doc? She has an MBA after all
 
BULLSHIIT

If she was hot and put out, you would all over that like bees around honey.
NO F'ING WAY THAT ISN'T TRUE. And if you claim that is true, amigo, you don't have two dangling organs between your legs producing testosterone.
Can't tell if this was meant to be over the top joking, or if you are legitimately of the opinion that someone is less of a man for not wanting to have sex with a person who they find physically attractive but otherwise revolting.

If the former... cringey, but ok?
If the latter: maybe go check out the lounge and see if there are any freshmen over there that you can beat up and then stuff into a gym locker?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Had the same thought.

By the same blade, I've said this on here before:

"What we need now are Admin MLPs, so that admins can be marginalized and see how they eff everything up."
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.

Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.

Not working for that…
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Hmm
Reactions: 16 users
Can't tell if this was meant to be over the top joking, or if you are legitimately of the opinion that someone is less of a man for not wanting to have sex with a person who they find physically attractive but otherwise revolting.

If the former... cringey, but ok?
If the latter: maybe go check out the lounge and see if there are any freshmen over there that you can beat up and then stuff into a gym locker?

You've missed the tenor of his post altogether.

@thegenius Bro. I gotchu.

I'll say this: I have definitely ignored the phone calls of a model-caliber chick in undergrad because I couldn't stand to listen to her when she opened her mouth.

Granted, the 2nd date ended well. But there wasn't a third. I had *had* enough.
 
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.

Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.

Not working for that…
How is that possible
 
How is that possible
Who knows. A lot of us were getting very irritated prior to this.

This was the last straw, I think they are about to lose almost all the docs. Maybe that will make them reconsider
 
We had 2 docs interview as well.
We had 8 docs resign today, so far. Good luck to them!

How can they make a "medical director" a midlevel? That makes no sense, particularly if physicians interviewed. How can they choose a midlevel - essentially a nurse - over a physician for a clinical role like this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
How can they make a "medical director" a midlevel? That makes no sense, particularly if physicians interviewed. How can they choose a midlevel - essentially a nurse - over a physician for a clinical role like this?
Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.

@NYEMMED Have you contacted your state medical board about this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.

@NYEMMED Have you contacted your state medical board about this?

Agreed. Admins unless called out frequently do shady things. I was previously a medical director at a facility (not in ED) where I would deny patients for not meeting admission criteria and the directive from corporate to the marketing director (who was a physical therapy assistant with an associate's degree!) was to have the Medicine team admit them regardless of lack of appropriateness. This is why directors should only be physicians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.

Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.

Not working for that…

Still literally can't believe I read this.

Hours later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Still literally can't believe I read this.

Hours later.
Agreed. I read the post this morning and did a quick WTF. I just reread this after working in the woodshop for a few hours, and I'm only increasingly incredulous. Maybe one of the techs in the ED should apply to be chief medical officer while they're at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.

@NYEMMED Have you contacted your state medical board about this?
I didn’t know about this. It’s a good idea!

Call these admins out on their ****
 
What state are you in? How big of a practice? Do you work for a CMG? Are you allowed to tell us? Maybe you can give us vague details because this is crazy.
 
What state are you in? How big of a practice? Do you work for a CMG? Are you allowed to tell us? Maybe you can give us vague details because this is crazy.
Southeast. 2 hospital system between Georgia and FL. Hospital employed
 
Well, it's not like the medical director can cover the shifts!

This is actually a brilliant tactic. You can all refuse to pick up any shifts, call-out on shifts, etc... then you can point out that it's the director's job to cover those shifts... Oh, waaait....

She’s right from a population health standpoint. Diversion doesn’t improve that. But it does give respite temporarily to a helplessly overwhelmed ED. Admin will never understand the stress of having a gross excess of patients that you are personally responsible for. They simply can’t understand it since they can’t live it.

[Politely sarcastic]: Yeah, but like - who caaares, maaan. Here's what you just said: "People aren't going to stop using ambulances to seek care, diversion doesn't improve that." Yeah, it won't stop a person from dialing 9-1-1 and getting into a rig. But our capacity to care for them is independent of that. She's not "right from a population health standpoint". She's still wrong. "Population health" isn't what we do in the ER.
 
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.

Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.

Not working for that…

Wtf man thats some crazy horsepuckey. I wish I could say im surprised, but ya, nothing surprised anymore. Medicine is fuked. Just gotta make it a few more years……

Oh and speaking of BS, why the balls do I have to recert in ACLS as a freakin triple boarded doc? What colossal stupidity is this? Debating not fillin out paperwork for a per diem job, its already such a waste of time. (procedure logs, acls atls pals bls certs, letters of rec, peer reference, 1st grade report card, letter from kindergarten teacher saying I play well with others,) Need anything else ya damn waste of space admin? Meanwhile a NONPHYSICIAN is taking over as med director but I have to take ACLS? WhAt?!!

/rant off
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
[Politely sarcastic]: Yeah, but like - who caaares, maaan. Here's what you just said: "People aren't going to stop using ambulances to seek care, diversion doesn't improve that." Yeah, it won't stop a person from dialing 9-1-1 and getting into a rig. But our capacity to care for them is independent of that. She's not "right from a population health standpoint". She's still wrong. "Population health" isn't what we do in the ER.
I was trying to state the opposite. THEY (admin) argue population health or some vague business term. Any real emergency physician understands that we deal with individuals, not populations. One crummy shift at a time.
 
Wtf man thats some crazy horsepuckey. I wish I could say im surprised, but ya, nothing surprised anymore. Medicine is fuked. Just gotta make it a few more years……

Oh and speaking of BS, why the balls do I have to recert in ACLS as a freakin triple boarded doc? What colossal stupidity is this? Debating not fillin out paperwork for a per diem job, its already such a waste of time. (procedure logs, acls atls pals bls certs, letters of rec, peer reference, 1st grade report card, letter from kindergarten teacher saying I play well with others,) Need anything else ya damn waste of space admin? Meanwhile a NONPHYSICIAN is taking over as med director but I have to take ACLS? WhAt?!!

/rant off
When I started my Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship I was required to get BLS certified.

I asked, does it matter that I'm a BCEP? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm an ACLS Instructor in the very center that will test my BLS skills? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm doing a Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship and WONT BE CODING PEOPLE? Nope.
 
  • Like
  • Hmm
Reactions: 3 users
When I started my Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship I was required to get BLS certified.

I asked, does it matter that I'm a BCEP? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm an ACLS Instructor in the very center that will test my BLS skills? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm doing a Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship and WONT BE CODING PEOPLE? Nope.
Some people are hell bent in their rules.
 
I was trying to state the opposite. THEY (admin) argue population health or some vague business term. Any real emergency physician understands that we deal with individuals, not populations. One crummy shift at a time.

Precisely.
You've interpreted me correctly.
That's why my sarcasm was *polite*.
 
I refused to submit BLS/ACLS/ATLS/PALS certification to a rural critical access hospital where I briefly wanted to work locums. I cited ACEP’s policy statement. The hospital dropped their policy of requiring for BC EM. I think they mainly wanted for physicians not boarded in EM. I suspect many outdated hospitals keep this requirement. I haven’t had those merit badge certifications in years. Continue to fight back against this antiquated position.
 
I didn’t know about this. It’s a good idea!

Call these admins out on their ****
Update:

After 14 of the 20 physicians resigned, we got an email today that “in light of current events, and administrative challenges”

Long story short, they stopped the nonsense, promised to open the search again for a PHYSICIAN, and asked if we would all consider staying
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 28 users
Update:

After 14 of the 20 physicians resigned, we got an email today that “in light of current events, and administrative challenges”

Long story short, they stopped the nonsense, promised to open the search again for a PHYSICIAN, and asked if we would all consider staying

Bravo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Update:

After 14 of the 20 physicians resigned, we got an email today that “in light of current events, and administrative challenges”

Long story short, they stopped the nonsense, promised to open the search again for a PHYSICIAN, and asked if we would all consider staying
I am honestly shocked you got 14 physicians to agree on something.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12 users
Top