- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Messages
- 7,865
- Reaction score
- 13,576
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"
"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."
"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."
"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"
"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."
"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."
"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."
"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."
"Can we please just change the subject."
Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
Was she hot?
Yeah, but that only gets your foot in the door with me.Was she hot?
You gotta take one for the team and keep that one rolling for a while. Lol.Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"
"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."
"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."
"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"
"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."
"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."
"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."
"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."
"Can we please just change the subject."
Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
Agreed this thread has potential but we definitely need it to keep going. Sorry OPYou gotta take one for the team and keep that one rolling for a while. Lol.
Must have been an NPLOL @ "I know what it looks like down in the ER because I shadowed at my last job."
She knows, man. She KNOWS.
Must have been an NP
Asking the important questions here.Was she hot?
Slightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"
"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."
"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."
"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"
"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."
"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."
"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."
"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."
"Can we please just change the subject."
Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
Wouldn't matter to me. I couldn't stand being around someone so ostriched.
Agree. The only people who really understand what we do, is us.She’s right from a population health standpoint. Diversion doesn’t improve that. But it does give respite temporarily to a helplessly overwhelmed ED. Admin will never understand the stress of having a gross excess of patients that you are personally responsible for. They simply can’t understand it since they can’t live it.
BULLSHIITWouldn't matter to me. I couldn't stand being around someone so ostriched.
What do you know doc? She has an MBA after allSlightly unrelated, but interesting anecdote: I went on a date with one of the new C-suite execs of one of the hospitals I work at the other day. Didn't know she was c-suite until after I had asked her out on a dating app. Within minutes of starting the date, she brought up ER holds and going on EMS diversion and how she always refuses EMS diversion requests at her prior job "because they don't work". My response was "what is your definition of 'doesn't work'?"
"Well, EMS can ignore a diversion request and everyone else will eventually just go on diversion."
"Well sure, but they typically don't ignore diversion requests unless there is a good reason, and if you don't go on diversion when necessary and everyone around you goes on diversion in a city of millions of people, you are going to set yourself up for a disaster situation."
"I've seen the numbers, it doesn't change anything?"
"You've seen what numbers? There is no way you are claiming that shutting down EMS traffic has no effect on patient volumes. From a boots on the ground perspective, the results are almost instantaneous when you are going from 10-15 new EMS patients an hour to 0."
"It doesn't shut down EMS traffic, but that's nice that y'all feel that it works."
"In our system, it effectively does outside of priority 1 patients and specific patient requests typically. And that's an aggressively condescending statement to an ER physician that's been doing this job for 7 years, and you just started doing yours 2 weeks ago."
"I did shadow the ER doctors I worked with at my last job, so I know what it looks like down in the ER when it's busy."
"Can we please just change the subject."
Amazingly she has been hitting me up for a second date. I might need to find a new job.
Can't tell if this was meant to be over the top joking, or if you are legitimately of the opinion that someone is less of a man for not wanting to have sex with a person who they find physically attractive but otherwise revolting.BULLSHIIT
If she was hot and put out, you would all over that like bees around honey.
NO F'ING WAY THAT ISN'T TRUE. And if you claim that is true, amigo, you don't have two dangling organs between your legs producing testosterone.
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.Had the same thought.
By the same blade, I've said this on here before:
"What we need now are Admin MLPs, so that admins can be marginalized and see how they eff everything up."
Can't tell if this was meant to be over the top joking, or if you are legitimately of the opinion that someone is less of a man for not wanting to have sex with a person who they find physically attractive but otherwise revolting.
If the former... cringey, but ok?
If the latter: maybe go check out the lounge and see if there are any freshmen over there that you can beat up and then stuff into a gym locker?
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.
Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.
Not working for that…
How is that possibleI **** you not, I am resigning this morning.
Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.
Not working for that…
Who knows. A lot of us were getting very irritated prior to this.How is that possible
Who knows. A lot of us were getting very irritated prior to this.
This was the last straw, I think they are about to lose almost all the docs. Maybe that will make them reconsider
We had 2 docs interview as well.Did any of the docs go for the position? If so, wow.
8 out of [X] ?We had 2 docs interview as well.
We had 8 docs resign today, so far. Good luck to them!
We had 2 docs interview as well.
We had 8 docs resign today, so far. Good luck to them!
Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.How can they make a "medical director" a midlevel? That makes no sense, particularly if physicians interviewed. How can they choose a midlevel - essentially a nurse - over a physician for a clinical role like this?
Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.
@NYEMMED Have you contacted your state medical board about this?
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.
Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.
Not working for that…
Agreed. I read the post this morning and did a quick WTF. I just reread this after working in the woodshop for a few hours, and I'm only increasingly incredulous. Maybe one of the techs in the ED should apply to be chief medical officer while they're at it.Still literally can't believe I read this.
Hours later.
I didn’t know about this. It’s a good idea!Maybe an ED director for nursing, but no way can a midlevel supervise a physician. There are state medical board regulations that dictate it must be the other way, and I'm sure having a midlevel being medical director (i.e., supervising the care that physicians provide and patients receive) runs afoul of these regulations.
@NYEMMED Have you contacted your state medical board about this?
208 out of [X] ?
What state are you in? How big of a practice? Do you work for a CMG? Are you allowed to tell us? Maybe you can give us vague details because this is crazy.
Southeast. 2 hospital system between Georgia and FL. Hospital employedWhat state are you in? How big of a practice? Do you work for a CMG? Are you allowed to tell us? Maybe you can give us vague details because this is crazy.
Well, it's not like the medical director can cover the shifts!I imagine locum rates will go through the roof for that hospital.
Well, it's not like the medical director can cover the shifts!
She’s right from a population health standpoint. Diversion doesn’t improve that. But it does give respite temporarily to a helplessly overwhelmed ED. Admin will never understand the stress of having a gross excess of patients that you are personally responsible for. They simply can’t understand it since they can’t live it.
I **** you not, I am resigning this morning.
Reason:
We were sent an email last night that the ED medical director is now a NPP.
Not working for that…
I was trying to state the opposite. THEY (admin) argue population health or some vague business term. Any real emergency physician understands that we deal with individuals, not populations. One crummy shift at a time.[Politely sarcastic]: Yeah, but like - who caaares, maaan. Here's what you just said: "People aren't going to stop using ambulances to seek care, diversion doesn't improve that." Yeah, it won't stop a person from dialing 9-1-1 and getting into a rig. But our capacity to care for them is independent of that. She's not "right from a population health standpoint". She's still wrong. "Population health" isn't what we do in the ER.
When I started my Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship I was required to get BLS certified.Wtf man thats some crazy horsepuckey. I wish I could say im surprised, but ya, nothing surprised anymore. Medicine is fuked. Just gotta make it a few more years……
Oh and speaking of BS, why the balls do I have to recert in ACLS as a freakin triple boarded doc? What colossal stupidity is this? Debating not fillin out paperwork for a per diem job, its already such a waste of time. (procedure logs, acls atls pals bls certs, letters of rec, peer reference, 1st grade report card, letter from kindergarten teacher saying I play well with others,) Need anything else ya damn waste of space admin? Meanwhile a NONPHYSICIAN is taking over as med director but I have to take ACLS? WhAt?!!
/rant off
Some people are hell bent in their rules.When I started my Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship I was required to get BLS certified.
I asked, does it matter that I'm a BCEP? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm an ACLS Instructor in the very center that will test my BLS skills? Nope.
Does it matter that I'm doing a Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellowship and WONT BE CODING PEOPLE? Nope.
I was trying to state the opposite. THEY (admin) argue population health or some vague business term. Any real emergency physician understands that we deal with individuals, not populations. One crummy shift at a time.
Update:I didn’t know about this. It’s a good idea!
Call these admins out on their ****
Update:
After 14 of the 20 physicians resigned, we got an email today that “in light of current events, and administrative challenges”
Long story short, they stopped the nonsense, promised to open the search again for a PHYSICIAN, and asked if we would all consider staying
I am honestly shocked you got 14 physicians to agree on something.Update:
After 14 of the 20 physicians resigned, we got an email today that “in light of current events, and administrative challenges”
Long story short, they stopped the nonsense, promised to open the search again for a PHYSICIAN, and asked if we would all consider staying