I'm sure that you've been asked this a few times, and feel free to refer me to a previous response of yours, but at what point in medical school did you decide on neurosurgery?
I'm potentially interested in NSG, but I'm only a first year. What kind of things do you recommend I do to narrow down my specialty preferences - especially what I should do to rule in/out NSG?
Also, how important is it to have neuroscience bench research as opposed to research in other fields?
Hopefully I am not being a revisionist historian here, and feel free to call me out on it if I indicated otherwise in this thread or elsewhere, but I went in to medical school interested in and wanting to do neurosurgery. There were some residents on SDN in the neurosurgery forum that were helpful in guiding me towards things that would help me in the right direction. Namely, I took on some research projects, did well in school and USMLE, did some subIs and so forth.
Commonly, in medical school, if you express interest in a particular field, you get pegged as only interested in that. I tried to keep my cards close to my chest and not be particularly overt about it. On third year rotations I would go through each clerkship and try to see myself doing this specialty for the rest of my life. Each had it's upsides and downsides, and ultimately, none surpassed my desire for neurosurgery. On top of that, I would look for things that might apply to neurosurgery from each field, though as a student this is neither easy nor useful. In any case, as a resident, when we had students on service that were interested in other fields, I would try to teach them specific things in neurosurgery applicable to their field. Likewise, I would have a mental list of things from each field for which we have been consulted or routinely partake in care of their patients. So hopefully, they would be able to take something away from the rotation!
I hate to say it, but the best way to rule it in or out is to spend some time with us. You could shadow for a day or weekend or a week and see if you like it or not. A full rotation would a better experience, and a subI perhaps better. Ultimately, there is no substitute for the real thing, and even people who have done multiple subIs can be shocked at how different it is being a resident than a student.
Finally, and this is just my take on things from how I hear attendings talk about students and their publications on applications, no one cares about bench research. Yes, we think it is incredibly useful and great if you have. No, you do not need it. In fact, having a clinical article of importance is far more impacting than a basic science. To clarify, they can relate better to that, and every neurosurgeon can understand what you are discussing. Whereas, if you are describing molecular interactions of signaling molecules in an obscure condition it quickly becomes something they would need a fair amount of context and reading to be able to intelligently discuss.