Thank you for the links DocJL. I read through them and admit that when they compaired public vs privite, the public had greater average compensation. Though one article did say:
"
As the report notes, it is difficult to do a real "apples-to-apples" comparison of public and private sector compensation because public sector job descriptions and duties may be very different from those in the private sector, and vice versa, so oftentimes there are no good positions to compare to in the other sector."
I think this is key. It's hard to average all the lower income occupations like walmart/mcdonalds type jobs in with the privite sector average and compair this average with public jobs which typically require alot more experience and education and state one is overpaid. Even lower paid jobs like military service allows good health benfits and a livable wage. I would argue that the reason the average public employee appears to make more, not controlling for education or experience, is because the quality of jobs are higher in public service (on average) and thus require more talent (on average).
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/wage-penalty-state-local-gov-employees/
daurange - I hope this addressed your comments as well. Your post was informative.
Yappy, thanks for taking the time to look into those links, I tried to post links from different sources, including mainstream sources (NOBODY could argue that USAToday, for example, was a "conservative" organization).
However, were you aware that the Center for Economic and Policy Research, which you linked to, is a well known progressive liberal think tank that makes no effort to hide it's political affiliation?
http://think-tanks.findthebest.com/directory/t/Liberal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Economic_and_Policy_Research
Although a bit off topic here, I will point out that I absolutely believe that labor unions have a part in our society, in the PRIVATE sector, but NOT in the public sector. The reason is as simple as human nature. In the private sector, if a business cannot meet the demands of it's respective labor union, the business will fail and be replaced by a more efficient one. In the PUBLIC sector however, the ones doing the "bargaining" and writing the contracts with the public workers unions are our elected officials, who quite frankly have no incentive to save the public money. Quite the contrary, they are "beholden to" the powerful labor unions, which deliver thousands of votes to their candidates, right on cue. One of my employees is married to a union member, before the last election she brought in a piece of paper from his union, that he received, "suggesting" exactly which candidate to vote for on every race in the election.
In Nevada, for instance, Public unions are breaking the bank with exhorbitant salaries and retirements. A firefighter, by gaming the system with overtime and "sick pay", can make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year - on a high school education. Look at this link, it is public information on the actual salaries and benefits paid to public employees. The numbers are astounding. On top of these huge salaries, they are able to retire in their forties with a 6 figure pension for the rest of their lives, as their pension is based on their highest pay the last 3 years of service.
http://transparentnevada.com/salaries/2009/clark/