Are you telling me that you think in the entire history of pharmacy robberies, there was only one time when pharmacy staff get shot?
Logic tells me there must be more. 5 minutes is all it took for me to find another case. Who taught y'all to google?
"Most robbers don't hurt anyone, but authorities are worried the risk of bloodshed is increasing as assaults multiply. In September, a clerk was fatally shot in the chest and a pregnant woman wounded in the foot when a shootout broke out between a robber and an armed employee at a pharmacy in a suburb of Sacramento, Calif.
In April, a gunman killed a pharmacist in Trenton, N.J., before stealing $10,000 in pills."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...macy-robberies/2011/06/25/AGjM3nkH_story.html
Turns out it was an Indian pharmacist who wouldn't give some teenager the drugs. Then the kid comes back with a gun and shoots the pharmacist. Some people will shoot you just because you disrespect them. You can't imagine how trifle killing someone can be to certain segments of the population.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/indian-pharmacist-shot-dead-in-new-jersey-102496
That one Massacre you mention, the robbers didn't even ask for drugs. They shot first then took the drugs off the shelves. What you say about them not wanting to kill applies to professionals and the level headed. These robberies are attracting those who would ordinarily be robbing corner stores and gas stations. Youtube is rife with videos of robbers shooting even after getting the money. And you should capitalize John Wayne.