- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 440
- Reaction score
- 23
I don't have the ref now but I'm sure one of you do. It wasn't in the ardsnet supplemental, but it was collected data and published.
There were thousands of eligible patient..... The majority of which were excluded for this and that. Those excluded patients continued on 10cc/kg standard of care. The included patients in the study were then randomized to 12 or 6cc. Mortality of the 6cc was lower than the 12 but still equal to the 10!
Am I missing something? Isn't that odd?
There were thousands of eligible patient..... The majority of which were excluded for this and that. Those excluded patients continued on 10cc/kg standard of care. The included patients in the study were then randomized to 12 or 6cc. Mortality of the 6cc was lower than the 12 but still equal to the 10!
Am I missing something? Isn't that odd?
Last edited: