I’m sick of hearing anecdotes about individual patients feeling better after being treated with OMM. Talk to the long-time clients of any homeopath, reflexologist, faith healer, etc., and you’ll hear the same exact things. If I’m going to consider the possibility that the effects of OMM treatment surpass the effects that stem from the placebo effect and the body’s natural recovery progress, I want to see large-scale, rigorous studies in reputable journals.
One might respond, “Sure, our only empirical evidence comes from small, horribly designed studies from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, a propaganda arm of the AOA—but we understand how OMM works in theory!” No. The mechanisms that are proposed to explain osteopathic theories and principles virtually all stem from reckless misapplications of science. Like many forms of quackery, osteopathy surrounds itself with a thin veil of technical, fancy-sounding terms and concepts in order to seem credible. It’s all just a facade, meant to cover up what is really an outdated, irrelevant brand of pseudoscience.
Osteopathy doesn’t make sense in theory, and there’s still no strong evidence that it works in practice. It would never even cross my mind to refer a patient to a physician who regularly performs OMM treatments. Scam artists and delusional mystics have no place in the medical profession.