Do hospitals hire IM docs over FM docs when it comes to job opportunities as hospitalists particularly in the big cities such as LA/SF etc?
Do hospitals hire IM docs over FM docs when it comes to job opportunities as hospitalists particularly in the big cities such as LA/SF etc?
I’m in a rural location. There’s 0 prejudice here about it.
Thanks for posting. I'm about to start my FM residency this July. I know I may be jumping the gun but I'm ultimately interested in becoming a rural nocturnist. Do you have any advice for what I can/should do in my three years to help me prepare for that career?
I'm an FM resident on Long Island graduating in a few months. I've been interviewing for hospitalist jobs and about to settle on an offer. Yes, there is bias and many of the hospitals out here won't consider FM candidates. Just the way it is. As far as preparing for this career track, I would say a lot of it depends on the strength and volume of your program's inpatient medicine training. At most of my interviews, I was asked about how many months of inpatient medicine I had and why I felt I had sufficient training from an FM program for hospitalist medicine. If your program only has you doing a few months of medicine per year, you're going to want to take most of your electives on either more medicine service or something inpatient-related (ICU, cardiology, etc). Set up rotations to work with the hospitalists at your location. I used both my 3rd year elective months to work on the hospitalist service. It was good experience, solid boost to the CV and also gave me a couple of great recommendations/references to use when employers asked for them. Hope this helpsThanks for posting. I'm about to start my FM residency this July. I know I may be jumping the gun but I'm ultimately interested in becoming a rural nocturnist. Do you have any advice for what I can/should do in my three years to help me prepare for that career?
I'm an FM resident on Long Island graduating in a few months. I've been interviewing for hospitalist jobs and about to settle on an offer. Yes, there is bias and many of the hospitals out here won't consider FM candidates. Just the way it is. As far as preparing for this career track, I would say a lot of it depends on the strength and volume of your program's inpatient medicine training. At most of my interviews, I was asked about how many months of inpatient medicine I had and why I felt I had sufficient training from an FM program for hospitalist medicine. If your program only has you doing a few months of medicine per year, you're going to want to take most of your electives on either more medicine service or something inpatient-related (ICU, cardiology, etc). Set up rotations to work with the hospitalists at your location. I used both my 3rd year elective months to work on the hospitalist service. It was good experience, solid boost to the CV and also gave me a couple of great recommendations/references to use when employers asked for them. Hope this helps
I agree with Nitras' comments. The number of months may not be the most important factor, but rather the quality of the training during those months. Where I am, the FM inpatient training is pretty strong and the hospital has hired many past grads as hospitalists.About How many months would you say someone would need to be comfortable in an inpatient setting?
Be aware different programs can be wildly different.
Where I’m at currently, the FM residency training in inpatient medicine appears to be abysmal. Their census rarely gets to double digits, and they are “protected” from anything that resembles work.
So why do places take midlevels to be hospitalists with minimal supervision? They have less inpatient exp than I do in my 4th year now lol.Be aware different programs can be wildly different.
Where I’m at currently, the FM residency training in inpatient medicine appears to be abysmal. Their census rarely gets to double digits, and they are “protected” from anything that resembles work.
I know other programs work them hard on their inpatient months, and I’ve seen good FM hospitalists. Of the 40+ hospitalists in my group I believe there is only one FM. So, yes. If you want to work hospitalist jobs, IM will open more doors.
So why do places take midlevels to be hospitalists with minimal supervision?
and until that issue is addressed, no reason for any doctor to claim that FM cannot do hospitalist work.
and until that issue is addressed, no reason for any doctor to claim that FM cannot do hospitalist work.
Stretches to other areas too. Always wondered why we hold such a high standard for doctors doing X work but then let people with a a minimal fraction of the training do that exact same work with minimal to no real supervision.You are correct, sir.
Stretches to other areas too. Always wondered why we hold such a high standard for doctors doing X work but then let people with a a minimal fraction of the training do that exact same work with minimal to no real supervision.
Bingo. I know I have heard a lot of my peers saying they will never take a midlevel but we are young and idealistic. I wonder what will really happen when greed sets in.Sometimes (frequently), doctors are the ones making bank off the midlevels. Blame your colleagues.
Actually a lot of younger attendings do as well.Ahhhh. Classic SDN. Medical students trashing professions and mid levels.
Bingo. I know I have heard a lot of my peers saying they will never take a midlevel but we are young and idealistic. I wonder what will really happen when greed sets in.
And sir, that is why I respect you.I'm old and crotchety, and I'll never work with a midlevel.
Depends on what type of outpatient you’re talking about eventually doing. Cash only or DPC? FM is safer. Cog in the machine? Doesn’t matter IM or FM.
Anyone can do outpatient though, and IM is equally capable of DPC practices as well.
I mean, kinda?Well, not quite. DPC is less "marketable" if you only cater to adults. Parent's generally don't like to shaft kids from getting healthcare.
Well, not quite. DPC is less "marketable" if you only cater to adults. Parent's generally don't like to shaft kids from getting healthcare.
Pluses and minuses. You do lose out on some of the folks that want their whole family to see you. But there are still patients out there who think internists are better at adult outpatient medicine than we are. Probably about balances out.I see your point, but the first DPC I met in person was an IM doc who was disillusioned with hospitalist life and started a DPC in the Midwest. He was actually one of the more successful DPC evangelists in the area and seemed to be doing pretty well. I'd imagine the Midwest's huge elderly population and their desire to see the physician for 30-60min tends to help with that.
Pluses and minuses. You do lose out on some of the folks that want their whole family to see you. But there are still patients out there who think internists are better at adult outpatient medicine than we are. Probably about balances out.
I had thought about mentioning that, but my wife recently transition from hospitalist to outpatient and she's picking up procedures pretty quickly just using a good procedure book.Internists who do DPC will likely be more challenged regarding the stuff they normally refer out, especially anything involving procedures (e.g., derm and ortho) unless they take some additional CME courses.