Crazy!
I see seizuring patients all the frickin' time. I saw two on my last shift alone, one that came in actively seizuring, and one that was clustering for the owner, arrived not seizuring, and started seizuring soon after presentation.
Nothing weird about using midazolam. As best I know, the only real advantage over diazepam (given that nyanko says it doesn't matter) is that it's IM absorption is more predictable than diazepam. We stock both in our hospital ... just out of habit I reach for diazepam for actively seizuring patients and switch to a midazolam CRI if I want to go the CRI route. No real logic to it.
I guess my clinicians just hammered those drug doses into me. I remember a big long rounds chat about "what do you have to have memorized," and all the residents and staff looked around at each other and concluded that seizuring drugs are the biggies. Sounds like the other schools don't emphasize it as much.
I'm glad mine did, considering I see it frequently. In the end, it doesn't really matter. You memorize the drugs you use frequently, so in the long run ... who cares.
Well, I wouldn't expect it in a GP practice, since there are other reasons to have patients in hospital. But any patient I keep (ok, ALMOST any - occasionally I courtesy hospitalize some laceration repair without charging the owner if I know I can't repair it until 2AM or something and I want to let the owner bail and pick up in the AM) they're sick and I'd be remiss if I didn't have venous access in case they declined. 95% of them are on fluids anyway, and of the remainder that might not be, most of those are CHF cases where I want a catheter for giving lasix and other drugs....