1) Your individual scores and composite score:
14PS, 11VR, 14BS, WS = Q Composite =
39Q
Test Date: 8/10/12
2) Study method used:
I followed SN2ed's 3-month schedule almost exactly. The only portion I omitted was the hat trick. I won't rehash the schedule, as it is stickied and everyone who is thinking of following it should really study the original posts before starting. Needless to say, I
highly recommend it
3) What materials used for each section:
PS: BR, EK1001
BS: BR, EK1001
VR: Princeton Review Hyperlearning workbook, EK101
So Berkeley Review is gold. Nothing new here. I felt like the EK1001 series was decent, but it wasn't as useful for me personally. The style was very different from the MCAT, and I stopped using them halfway through my review.
4) Which practice tests did you use.
I exclusively used the AAMC practice tests
Average Practice Test Score :40
Lowest AAMC = 35
Highest AAMC = 42
5) Undergraduate Major:
Molecular Biology and Microbiology
6) Any other tips?
This is where I can have some fun, so first a few statistics.
a. Time commitments during study time
Lab = 15-20 hours/week.
Volunteering: 5 hours/week.
Don't overbook yourself during this time period. Be practical about how much time you need to study daily. I studied somewhere between 4 and 6 hours a day, however, there was a high level of variability.
b. Focus more on correcting mistakes and thoroughly reviewing than on rote memorization of formulas or facts. Personally, this meant that I spent half of my daily study time really intensively going over each problem I missed. I started a set of flashcards containing the information/concept from questions I missed and going over them daily.
c. How I did well on the PS:
So everybody knows that the 3 months is critical in terms of review. However, I think that there were extrinsic factors that helped me excel in this area. 1) Take all your pre-reqs! 2) I was an SI Leader for GenChem 2 as well as Physics I. This helped incredibly for review. If you can find tutoring opportunities, take them, especially if they are paid
d. How I did well on the BS:
1) My number one advice would be: read journal articles (I recommend Nature Medicine). If journal articles are intimidating for you (and they were for me in the beginning!) try review articles. Again, Nature Medicine has them, there are also the Nature Reviews journals. And no, I am not getting paid by Nature Publishing Group lol
KEY POINT: this is not for acquiring information or for content review. The articles are way too advanced and way too focused. This is to acquire the skill at reading graphs and dealing with and synthesizing complex information on topics you have never seen. My BS section was a breeze, because there was literally nothing they could throw at me more complicated than the research I was reading. This is not a skill you develop overnight. I've been reading 4-6 journal articles per week for about a year now.
e. How I did well on VR
So I was averaging 12-15 on verbal, so my score went down on the actual exam. No complaints though! I'm super happy with my score.
1) I am a huge reader (think over 100 fiction books since my freshman year of college, I'm a first semester senior now)
2) I am a very diverse reader: I read science fiction, fantasy, philosophy, ethics, history etc.
3) For me, the mindset in which I approached this section was the most critical piece. If I had the wrong outlook or attitude, it destroyed my score. So how did I approach this section?
With an interested attitude - think every article is the most fascinating thing in the world. You have to force yourself to do this sometimes.
My Mantra: Focus, DYA, Attack. So before every verbal passage, I would close my eyes, take a deep breath and repeat the mantra. DYA = defend your answer. If I couldn't provide a justification for choosing an answer, I wouldn't chose it. This was time consuming at first, but I got used to it and it helped me a lot. Attack reminded me to approach attack each question and to really apply sound reasoning to it.
4) Don't get discouraged by the verbal section. It didn't "click" for me until halfway through my MCAT preparation schedule.
f. classes I took which I thought were helpful (all three equally helpful):
Human Physiology, Biochemistry, Research Methods in Biomedical Sciences
e. Timing: never really had an issue.
Always practice (whether on practice tests or Berkeley Review) under timed conditions.
I cannot stress this highly enough. On practice tests, I routinely finished PS with 10 minutes to spare, VR with 5 min and BS with 10-15 min. On the actual exam, it didn't go down like that, but I was able to finish every section. Don't underestimate timing.
f. Motivation: Around the two month mark into my study schedule, I started to get a bit burnt out. I wasn't attacking my review sessions with the vigor I was used to. I found that this really detracted from my ability to do well, especially on the practice exams. What I ended up doing was to remind myself daily why I was taking this test. My end goal is to become the best doctor I can possibly be. And like most of you, I have dream schools. So every morning, I would wake up, get breakfast, maybe work out a little bit. Then I would log onto my computer and pull up the website of one of my dream medical schools. Seeing the pictures of students and of the campus really motivated me, and I imagined myself in those photos. The point of saying this isn't to suggest that somehow, checking med school websites improved my MCAT score. My point is that it is beneficial to find what motivates you, and to hold on to that throughout this whole long, and grueling process.
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
Around 3 months.
Best of luck everybody, this beast is conquerable!