- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 11,835
- Reaction score
- 11,952
Seems like a reasonable thing to consider IMO as, honestly, the CMS direct supervision rule change seem to be the final nail in the coffin.
The job market had been getting worse for years, both geographically and in terms of offers and ability to lateral into another job at a similar seniority/compensation level.
Rad Onc labor oversupply hurts everyone in the field, except those entrenched in academics who created and benefit from this problem. CMS, through no fault of their own, have firmly cemented this specialty to be in oversupply after an announcement a week ago regarding hospital-based RO supervision rules.
Pgy-5s are losing offers before they sign contracts, existing practitioners are getting offers to go part-time at lower salaries given the change to back to "general supervision". In some cases, "extra" docs are getting their "pink slips." I imagine many partnership track docs will be cut loose soon if they were partnering in with large, hospital-based RO professional groups.
Residents without jobs are going into unaccredited fellowships trying to get any advantage to get into to a certain place for a job, or wait out the job market, only to get screwed when it comes time for their first paycheck.
Tell me why not?
To anyone applying Radiation Oncology this year through the nrmp, understand that senior residents are actively losing offers, and existing practitioners are at risk of getting let go/reduced compensation with the cessation of the "direct supervision" requirement for hospital-based RO. Trying to get a freestanding PP job was a tough shot even before all this ever happened. You are simply meat being fed into an academic machine that will use your labor for 4 years and spit you out with any concern regarding your job prospects or employability after residency
The job market had been getting worse for years, both geographically and in terms of offers and ability to lateral into another job at a similar seniority/compensation level.
Rad Onc labor oversupply hurts everyone in the field, except those entrenched in academics who created and benefit from this problem. CMS, through no fault of their own, have firmly cemented this specialty to be in oversupply after an announcement a week ago regarding hospital-based RO supervision rules.
Pgy-5s are losing offers before they sign contracts, existing practitioners are getting offers to go part-time at lower salaries given the change to back to "general supervision". In some cases, "extra" docs are getting their "pink slips." I imagine many partnership track docs will be cut loose soon if they were partnering in with large, hospital-based RO professional groups.
Residents without jobs are going into unaccredited fellowships trying to get any advantage to get into to a certain place for a job, or wait out the job market, only to get screwed when it comes time for their first paycheck.
Tell me why not?
To anyone applying Radiation Oncology this year through the nrmp, understand that senior residents are actively losing offers, and existing practitioners are at risk of getting let go/reduced compensation with the cessation of the "direct supervision" requirement for hospital-based RO. Trying to get a freestanding PP job was a tough shot even before all this ever happened. You are simply meat being fed into an academic machine that will use your labor for 4 years and spit you out with any concern regarding your job prospects or employability after residency
Last edited: