Hey,
For, 1,2-ethanediol would there be one triplet and one doublet?
For, 1,2-ethanediol would there be one triplet and one doublet?
Hey,
For, 1,2-ethanediol would there be one triplet and one doublet?
what about the hydrogen from the alcohol group?
The two protons on the alcohol are in the same chemical environment, therefore its a singlet.
But aren't the hydrogens on the carbons in the same chemical environment as well? Why are they splitting eachother? because they aren't splitting the alcohol proton.
Right, but what is splitting those chemically equivalent protons on the carbons? There are 4 chemically eq on the carbons, and the two on the OH. And they aren't splitting the OH proton right? I'm really having a brain freeze I'm usually fine with NMR.
So where is the triplet coming from..where are 2 extra protons that are splitting the 4 hydrogens on the carbons?
There are 6 hydrogens total yes? 2 are the OH protons. They aren't split and do not split. Therefore there are 4 hydrogens left. All 4 of those hydrogens are chemically equivalent.
SO
shouldn't there be a singlet for the OH protons, singlet for the 4 hydrogens on the carbons?
Yes, there is a singlet for the OH protons, and no there is not a singlet for the 4 hydrogens. Just because there are chemically equivalent hydrogens doesn't mean that they do not split each other-it just means that there will be one signal representing them all-I think that's what's causing the confusion. So we already established that the OH hydrogen does not split, and so there is 1 signal represenitng BOTH OH hydrogens. There are two -CH2-groups, each splitting the other (2 H + 1=3), hence the triplet. Since there are two chemically equivalent -CH2- groups, there will be ONE signal representing them both (just like how there's 1 signal representing BOTH OH protons)-the only difference is the methylene hydrogens split each other. Don't confuse chemical equivalency with splitting.
I don't think you're right here. You only split when there isn't chemical equivalence. Chemically equivalent protons do not split. For example, here's the spectrum for 1,2-dichloroethane. There's no coupling.
http://riodb01.ibase.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi
I don't think you're right here. You only split when there isn't chemical equivalence. Chemically equivalent protons do not split. For example, here's the spectrum for 1,2-dichloroethane. There's no coupling.
http://riodb01.ibase.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi
Nvm-I was confusing equivalent protons on different carbons (like two methyls splitting the -CH hydrogen, and not actually each other) with those right next to each other.
so.. do you agree with 2 singlets..?
So is this correct for the following two examples:
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3 : two triplets and one quartet
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH3: two singlets