- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
It's quite alarming that in this metabolic syndrome epidemic, there is a divergence of opinion from health professionals regarding an appropriate diet.
There is a growing proponent of supporters for a low carb high-fat (LCHF) diet as described in dietdoctor.com, and supported by physicians like Canadian nephrologist and LCHF evangelist Dr. Jason Fung. These proponents argue that the low-fat craze was initiated from poor studies and continued via sugar lobbyists and good ol' medical inertia. An example of a poor landmark study was via physiologist Dr. Ancel Keys who linked heart disease with the consumption of fats by comparing the diets of americans and the brits to the japanese (while ignoring heart-healthy butter loving nations like france, and norway). He inevitably endorsed (and was covered on TIME magazine in 1964), a daily caloric profile of 70% carbs 15% fat: http://nypost.com/2016/12/20/how-butter-became-a-villain-and-why-its-actually-really-good-for-you/
These LCHF folks then argue that there is mounting evidence of the alternative (This source links 19 RCTs favouring LCHF for weight control and chronic disease: The Science of Low Carb - Diet Doctor).
On the otherhand, my senior attending staff (ie. conventional medical wisdom) and uptodate and other prolific medical resources would claim that there are huge merits to a low fat diet instead. On the uptodate article "Obesity in adults: Dietary therapy", it notes the merits of a LCHF diet; however, it ultimately argues that a low fat diet is atleast non-inferior to LCHF and cites studies that support that claim (studies that I don't personally find very compelling).
I'm a Canadian medical resident, and it required a substantial amount of digging and an understanding of medical literature for me to currently be in favour of LCHF. Imagine how challenging it is for our patients to be confident enough in their idea of an ideal diet in order to stick to it and develop meaningfully positive long-term outcomes.
What do you all think? LCHF FTW? Low-fat FTW?
There is a growing proponent of supporters for a low carb high-fat (LCHF) diet as described in dietdoctor.com, and supported by physicians like Canadian nephrologist and LCHF evangelist Dr. Jason Fung. These proponents argue that the low-fat craze was initiated from poor studies and continued via sugar lobbyists and good ol' medical inertia. An example of a poor landmark study was via physiologist Dr. Ancel Keys who linked heart disease with the consumption of fats by comparing the diets of americans and the brits to the japanese (while ignoring heart-healthy butter loving nations like france, and norway). He inevitably endorsed (and was covered on TIME magazine in 1964), a daily caloric profile of 70% carbs 15% fat: http://nypost.com/2016/12/20/how-butter-became-a-villain-and-why-its-actually-really-good-for-you/
These LCHF folks then argue that there is mounting evidence of the alternative (This source links 19 RCTs favouring LCHF for weight control and chronic disease: The Science of Low Carb - Diet Doctor).
On the otherhand, my senior attending staff (ie. conventional medical wisdom) and uptodate and other prolific medical resources would claim that there are huge merits to a low fat diet instead. On the uptodate article "Obesity in adults: Dietary therapy", it notes the merits of a LCHF diet; however, it ultimately argues that a low fat diet is atleast non-inferior to LCHF and cites studies that support that claim (studies that I don't personally find very compelling).
I'm a Canadian medical resident, and it required a substantial amount of digging and an understanding of medical literature for me to currently be in favour of LCHF. Imagine how challenging it is for our patients to be confident enough in their idea of an ideal diet in order to stick to it and develop meaningfully positive long-term outcomes.
What do you all think? LCHF FTW? Low-fat FTW?