Oh, sorry, I don't know anything about academic medicine.
--
Il Destriero
Are you being sarcastic? I probably wasn't being clear.
I think I was agreeing with you, and trying to point out where backtobasics was correct and where he was not. I was contrasting the attitudes in basic science research at the undergraduate level with that of those in academic
medicine.
I have years of first hand experience with someone who climbed through academia to go from grad student to professor in the
basic sciences at a prestigious
undergraduate university with a $1 million in grant money to start (not a lot, still), and in that time had a lot of opportunities to rub shoulders with basic science researchers, PIs, and professors behind the scenes. I also saw one of these high powered PIs go from a public teaching institution to a private research-only facility. It seemed that outside of clinical medicine at the undergraduate level, most basic scientists were focused on research. In fact, quite a few of them start their appointments with no teaching duties whatsoever
for years as they establish their labs.
I've also found the math instructors to be much the same - definitely top of their field and into their research, hit or miss on teaching. Most of them didn't get to the top of their field because of a focus on education.
As far as those that want to teach, this was one reason mentioned to me when I was at community college, why our community college had a better teaching reputation than the state university down the street. ALL of the teachers chosen for the CC were chosen
to teach, and the ones who applied where generally there for the purpose of being
professional teachers. This most definitely could not be stated for the university science department. It's been said some are teaching at the CC level because they are industry and other sorts of wash outs, but I imagine it depends on the competition for such appointments as to the quality of the teaching there. In any case, no one was there to do research as their #1 or even #2 goal or duty. (I'll spare the paragraph on the place of research at the CC level)
Now, I likely don't know as much as you do about academic medicine, although medical education has always been my passion.
It seemed to me that you have MDs in academia at medical universities whose career pattern is much like the basic science researchers above, often MD/PhDs and others with bench research or big grants. And while all academic positions have an expectation of "scholarly" work in the field, it isn't always what I think a lot of green med students imagine it to be. Often that sort of work involves being published on topics in medical education, developing curriculum, etc. Basically, advancing
education. At least those were a lot of the role models I worked with at my medical school. Most of the MDs in academia at medical universities in my experience were not just there for basic science research, but a heavy component of their job was clinical practice and education.
TLDR:
The stereotype of the science professor that only cares about his research and is high on the autism spectrum and can't teach, is only really true at the
undergraduate level. The MD is a different degree, it's a different beast, the sort of person selected to even get one differs from PhDs. People who take the MD pathway and go into academic medicine, will most often, as
@IlDestriero points out, be focused on clinical medicine or education as part of their duties. People that only give a **** about research don't usually go the this pathway.