LOL at your BS. Now that you've realized you screwed yourself of ever getting into medical school, you're now trashing the family practice doctors. I don't know where you're getting your info but it seems you're pulling your facts from thin air. A family practice doctor working 30-40 hours a week will make 180K almost anywhere in the country. If you add in more hours (on-call, PRN, or moonlighting), then the FP can easily get 230K-300K depending on their geographic location. But most of the younger FP docs like to have a life outside work, so they settle for salaries in the 180-200K range.
On the other hand, I've heard of CRNAs and AAs making 160-200K, but that's when they work an additional 15-20 hours a week.
I don't know why you keep on quoting your supposed 'AA classmates' or 'pharmacists' on these forums. Every pharmacist you've mentioned is supposedly making 80-90K and hates their job. And every AA is supposedly making 150K and living it up. I know a lot of pharmacists. Some I know regret their decision to become a pharmacist and they live a miserable life. But I know a lot more pharmacists who are content with their job and are able to easily pull in 120-160K salaries on just FTE. Some of them are family members. I have never seen them regret their decision to become a pharmacist. Its not a glorious profession, but it can be a good one if you put work into it.
So enough with your f#$@ing stories. I don't want to hear your excuses. The only thing you do on these forums is post excuses for why you don't want to follow through with a commitment. You'll never get anything done if all you do is run away at the first sight of danger.
Are you blind? Did you not see the salaries posted on the AA/CRNA jobs website? If you want a more "robust" statistic, then how about this:
Nurse Anesthetists
I'm sure this is just more BS to you, but even the BLS shows that CRNAs earn a median income of $160k+. On the other hand, the same BLS source we have all seen indicates that pharmacists earn just over $122k in terms of median income.
Why is it that whenever I post an anecdotal story, people rush to point out that it's "just what 5 or 10 pharmacists have to say," but when someone else pulls numbers out of thin air (such as those regarding AA/CRNA incomes), of course they're objectively correct?
If wanting to do something else in the face of abysmal employment (or more like unemployment) projections counts as running away at the first sign of danger, then I'm guilty as charged. Between the stats that have been posted numerous times and what the apparently ill-informed DMs I have talked to have to say, it must all be BS because of course everyone else's fact-disproving anecdotes have to be true.
Edit: No, I did not make the comparison to FP doctors because I don't think I could ever get accepted to medical school. I think that with a high MCAT score, I could get accepted to a newer DO program (which I have said before). My point was that I would probably rather spend just 2 more years in school to earn close to what a primary care doctor makes, rather than spend 7-8 more years in school to actually BE a primary care doctor (this is one of the reasons I decided to go to AA school in the first place).
Keep in mind, you can insist all you want that I'm cherry-picking examples of AAs who are in unusually lucrative positions and comparing them to pharmacists who are in unusually bad job markets, but you won't find a single report anywhere on the internet or anywhere else about AAs/CRNAs having their hours cut to 20 hrs. Also, you can check out ANY AA job posting on Gaswork.com and see that even the lower-paying jobs are still advertising 5-6 weeks of PTO. There isn't a pharmacist job in the country that offers that much time off to start (except DOP, maybe?). That benefit alone makes AA/CRNA school worth pursuing over pharmacy, even if both professions paid the same annual income on average.
Last edit: And FP docs really do earn only $150k-$170k (includes taking call) working for the hospital systems here. The insurance payer mix demographics in my area range between 88%-92% Medicare/Medicaid/indigent during any random year, so the primary care docs who work as hospital employees aren't doing that well (obviously, private practice can be a different story). I was comparing hospital FP/IM doc incomes to AA incomes since AAs almost always work in hospitals.