- Joined
- Nov 23, 2015
- Messages
- 911
- Reaction score
- 1,537
You could do better if you just opened up right next door and started from scratch.
In any case, working as an associate, make sure you get a lawyer to review your contract, there is no non-compete, no penalties for leaving early, and that you get all your A/R if you do leave (if it's a production based model).
I don't agree with some of your comments. It's very easy to tell the OP to open up next door..... However, opening up next door will include having the ability to pay rent/lease, purchase/lease office equipment, purchase/lease computers, and an EHR system. It will include having to purchase office and medical supplies. It will include having to pay for his/her own malpractice insurance. It will include having to pay for office liability insurance. It will include having to pay for office overhead insurance if there is ever a disruption of services due to catastrophe or illness. It will include having to pay for fire, theft, etc., insurance. It will require having to pay for internet connections and for a phone system and phone lines and fax machine. It will require having to hire and PAY staff. It will require having to obtain facility privileges on his/her own and having to get credentialed on insurance panels on his/her own. It will require the doctor to have to pay all hospital and organization dues. And that's just the beginning of the list. Unless a doctor is independently wealthy or comes from a wealthy family, this scenario simply isn't realistic given the fact that most graduating residents are in serious debt. And that's not even considering that the doctor won't have any patient base and will have to wait for the schedule to fill.
So "opening next door" isn't as simple as putting up your diploma. There is serious cost/expense and no immediate return. So in all reality, opening next door isn't an option in today's medical climate.
In my opinion, a bonus of 10% after hitting 3x base truly sucks. The standard is in the 30% range.
Dr. Rogers wrote that you should make sure your contract also does NOT contain a non compete agreement. Unless a state does not allow non competes (such as California) I think it's also unrealistic for any employer to remove a non compete. Contrary to many urban legends, if legal in a particular state, non compete agreements ARE enforceable and can cost thousands and thousands to "fight". That statement is fact.
Over the years I have reviewed several hundred contracts for colleagues, graduating residents, friends, etc., and our practice has offered contracts to many doctors. And in states that a non compete is legal, I have NEVER reviewed a contract that didn't contain a non compete. Every contract we offered associates had a non compete and in EVERY contract I've reviewed the non compete was not negotiable. It's usually quite simple to the employer. If you don't like the non compete, don't sign the contract.
That being said, there are negotiable aspects to a non compete if the employer is reasonable. That includes reduction of the distance of the non compete and/or amount of years. Most importantly is if you are signing a contact with a practice that has several offices over a large geographic area. You can in essence, screw yourself by signing a non compete if there are many offices over a large area. It can potentially limit you from practicing in a major portion of the state.
I always recommend that when in this situation, ask the employer to only have a non compete for the office locations you actually work. That is a much more reasonable approach.
The bottom line is that non competes are legal in most states and are enforceable. And challenging a non compete in court is extremely expensive and is a long and drawn out process.