One Lung Ventilation - ITE Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Twptophan

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Prior to occlusion of any major pulmonary blood vessels during a thoracotomy, applying positive end-expiratory pressure to ventilation through the dependent lumen of a double-lumen tube and occluding the upper lumen of the tube will
  • (A) increase blood flow to the dependent lung
  • (B) increase the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference
  • (C) override hypercarbic pulmonary vasoconstriction
  • (D) improve the patient's oxygenation
  • (E) increase the right ventricular dP/dt

Members don't see this ad.
 
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Dec;21(12):938-43.
Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with high FEV1.
Valenza F1, Ronzoni G, Perrone L, Valsecchi M, Sibilla S, Nosotti M, Santambrogio L, Cesana BM, Gattinoni L.
Author information
  • 1Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation, taking into consideration underlying lung function in order to select responders to PEEP.
METHODS:
Forty-six patients undergoing open-chest thoracic surgical procedures were studied in an operating room of a university hospital. Patients were randomized to receive zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or 10 cmH2O of PEEP to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus. The patients were stratified according to preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as an indicator of lung function (below or above 72%). Oxygenation was measured in the supine position, in the lateral decubitus with an open chest, and after 20 min of ZEEP or PEEP. The respiratory system pressure-volume curve of the dependent hemithorax was measured in supine and open-chest lateral decubitus positions with a super-syringe.
RESULTS:
Application of 10 cmH2O of PEEP resulted in a significant increase in PaO2 (P < 0.05). This did not occur in ZEEP group, considered as a time matched control. PEEP improved oxygenation only in patients with high FEV1 (from 11.6+/-4.8 to 15.3+/-7.1 kPa, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the low FEV1 group. Dependent hemithorax compliance decreased in lateral decubitus, more in patients with high FEV1 (P < 0.05). PEEP improved compliance to a greater extent in patients with high FEV1 (from 33.6+/-3.6 to 48.4+/-3.9 mLcmH2O(-1), P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
During one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus, PEEP applied to the dependent lung significantly improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with rather normal lungs as assessed by high FEV1
 
Tidal Volme and Respiratory Rate
While every patient has optimal ventilatory settings for OLV, it takes time and effort to discover these, and may not be practical in the context of an anesthetic. Thus, a reliable starting point is desired. 5-6 cc/kg IBW with 5 cm H2O PEEP is recommended by Miller as a good starting point in patients without COPD. According to Barash, however, a TVOLV < 8 mL/kg can result in dependent-lung atelectasis as well as a decrease in FRC, thus the recommended TVOLV is 10-12 mL/kg. By contrast, a TVOLV > 15 mL/kg can increase PVR in the dependent lung, thus shunting blood to the operative lung. Barash also advocates a PaCO2 of 35 mm Hg, as significant hypocapnia may inhibit the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction response
PEEP in the Dependent Lung
PEEP10 has the theoretical advantages of increasing FRC in the dependent lung, thus improving the V/Q ratio and preventing atelectasis, and does not require cessation of surgery. That said, early studies of PEEP during FiO2 of 1.0 failed to find significant improvements in oxygenation [Tarhan et al. Can Anaesth Soc J 17: 4, 1970; Capan LM et al. Anesth Analg 59: 847, 1980]. A subsequent study of PEEP10 in diseased lungs (with PaO2 < 80 mm Hg) found some benefit [Cohen E et al. Anesth Analg 64: 200, 1985]. More recent studies have shown mixed results - Mascotto et al. randomized 50 patients to ZEEP versus PEEP, and found that PEEP lowered the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, with no differences in the requirement for 100% oxygen, reinflation of the operative lung, or PACU time [Mascotto et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20: 704, 2003]. Valenza et al. showed that 10 cm of PEEP in OLV was able to improve oxygenation in patients with an FEV1 of > 72%, but not in those with poor pulmonary function (< 72%) [Valenza et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21: 938, 2004, 48 patients]. Senturk et al. showed that the addition of 4 cm PEEP to PCVOLV, PEEP lowered plateau pressures, peak pressures, and Qs/Qt, and increased PaO2 in [Senturk et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19: 71, 2005, 25 patients]
Auto-PEEP
Tends to occur in emphysematous or elderly patients, and is worsened by the small DLT lumen. Can be beneficial if it move the patient towards FRC on the compliance curve (rare), but more often than not it moves that patient away from FRC. Most standard anesthesia ventilators cannot detect auto-PEEP (this requires end-expiratory flow interruption). Auto-PEEP is proportional to tidal volume and inversely proportional to expiratory time, thus, if it is suspected, consider lowering TV and increasing the expiratory time
CPAP in the Operative Lung
The MOST effective method by which PaO2 can be increased is application of CPAP to the operative lung [Capan LM et al. Anesth Analg 59: 847, 1980; Cohen E et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2: 34, 1988; Hogue et al. Anesth Analg 79: 364, 1994], but it must be preceded by a recruitment maneuver, as the opening pressure of atelectatic lung regions is > 20 cm H2O [Rothen HU et al. Br J Anaesth 71: 788, 1993]. In fact, if one fully inflates the lungs, only 1-2 cm H2O CPAP may be needed [Hogue CW. Anesth Analg 79: 364, 1994], which will improve intraoperative conditions
By contrast, some authors have suggested simply giving 5-10 cm H2O immediately after an inspiratory breath [Capan LM et al. Anesth Analg 59: 847, 1980], although it has been shown that insufflation only can increase PAO2 eventually (~ 45 minutes [Rees and Wansbrough. Anesth Analg 61: 507, 1982], as does intermittent reinflation of the lung [Malmkvist. Anesth Analg 68: 763, 1989]. CPAP10 has no hemodynamic consequences [Van Keer et al. J Clin Anesth 1: 284, 1989]. According to Barash, anything greater than 10 cm H2O may cause overdistention and/or hemodynamic consequences
 
New grad here so beware but after doing practice questions (hall, open anesthesia, and ace), the context of the OLV can be relevant in choosing "what to do first" in treating hypoxia....i.e. Pneumonectomy consider ligation, thoracoscopy avoid cpap which would obscure field, and finally peep to dependent lung clearly works (nice reference blade) but optimal amount can be tricky to find due to inhibition of hpv.
 
Top