- Joined
- Mar 5, 2016
- Messages
- 558
- Reaction score
- 385
You took the bad option in your scenario.I have a 3.1 gpa and 2.95 sgpa
So I need quite a bit higher to get accepted!
I had really bad stomach problems during the first section I had to guess on 5 passages in order to get to use the bathroom
Next time I'm taking Imodium
In my opinion, no one on this subsection gets a say in your final admission decision. So to let the stats of users here push you to void your exam...?? So what if your MCAT would have been in the 480s? Why not take a chance and still apply anyway? What if, just what if, you managed to get in somewhere? Even if you didn't get in, what are you going to do with the application fees money that you save? Another video game? Clothes? Food? I really think you should have taken that shot. The MCAT costs $310 and to go through all of that and walk away with nothing? Just a voided score, basically cancelling your exam? If it's not too late, rethink this and just take a chance. You lose nothing.
This is a bit misleading. I had a score around that range, and everyone in my group of interviewees had higher scores than me. Some had post-bac's. If you have a lower MCAT score, you need a much higher GPA, or amazing EC's, or a combination of both to be considered.
Problem here is, you're basing this on just a very little experience with a very small small group. What about the students before and after you? With the exception of like the 3 schools that screen, I think everyone else at least looks at all other aspects besides GPA & MCAT. doublefault should have taken a chance and applied. At least then he could call up a school and ask why he was rejected and how he could improve.
There's more than just gpa and mcat.