- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 659
- Reaction score
- 134
Yeah. I was told that if you learn by doing questions and reading explanations, and you're a good test taker, Casefiles and UWise should be enough. I'm a very good test taker. It was not enough.
I thought there were a lot of questions that came out of nowhere. Not really covered in UWise or Casefiles. Harder than the practice NBMEs. Also had a harder time figuring out what they were getting at than on Step 1. I'll update when scores come out.
There was a picture of female genitals with probably lichen sclerosus, and then the answers were all treatments I had never heard of.
There was a question where it sounded like the woman had post partum depression, but then none of the answers were post partum depression, they were all other psych disorders, none of which seemed to fit.
There was a question about the genetics of cleft lip (maybe, or maybe this was on the NBME practice exam, they're kind of running together at this point)
I used all those, minus the Blueprints. I also did both the NBME exams, which are great. Pretty good prep, although beware that there were still questions that I never saw before.I'm using Blueprints, Case Files, Uworld, and uwise. Hoping this will be a good recipe. Any thoughts?
just took the shelf.
basically everyone described as the same thing.
"WTF"
Weirdest test I've taken in med school so far. Very vague scenarios with like 2-3 good answers. Lots of "risk" questions with no clear answer (eg cervical cancer risk but multiple partners not in the answer choices). Lots of next step in management, but you can answer it 3 different ways depending on where you rotated and nothing you read will have a specific answer. Some epidemiology that was obscure (eg most common STI but both chlyamdia and gonorrhea in the answer choices).
just a weird test all around. uWise is definitely not enough, especially with respect to some of the risk/epidemiology/next management. uWise goes into too much detail in most cases and not enough in others. Uworld was better, but very narrow compared to how much material the shelf covered. I read Blueprints and that book was too vague on next steps to be useful for the shelf.
Overall, this is basically a gut test, not a test of knowledge. You'll read these questions, have a gut feeling and hopefully that gut feeling is in the answer choices. Often times it's not, so you got to be comfortable picking an answer choice that doesn't make you vomit.
Thanks for the update. Sounds rough, but I am sure you did fine. Any thoughts about using NBME subject text or Pretest questions? I heard pretest is pretty good with epidemiology.
How is the shelf now in terms of ACOG guidelines? For example I know they recently changed definitions of labor; should we be looking at the new definitions or the old ones? Or does it not matter in terms of the question style?
Why is it important to differentiate movement and tone under BPP?
Scaled Score 89
Percentile 97
UWorld (Great but incomplete)
UWise (Excellent)
Case Files (Excellent)
Blueprints (Questions only, Review test at the end is particularly good)
Pretest (Good)
Questions were short and felt relatively easy. Significant bias towards OB. Had time to review every question and I'm a fairly slow test taker. Curve is not very generous on this one though.
Only read Casefiles. Felt that was more than good enough for the shelf. Covers all the high yield topics and you can fill in the blanks with whatever questions you choose to do.so did you read any text or just did questions the entire time?
Anyone know the difference between cervidil & cytotec in terms of when you would use one vs the other aside from cytotec being way cheaper?
How much for UWise?
I put cervical cancer and got it incorrect...idk why it is cervical dysplasia? Does anyone know the distinction clinically between cancer and dysplasia?
Thanks for your help!Quick google search showed the other answer choices, one of which was Pregnancy. This fits the clinical picture much better: LMP 6 wks. ago, condom use occasionally, friable cervix, slightly enlarged uterus, increasing urinary symptoms, and thin, clear vaginal discharge (which is normal).
In contrast, cervical cancer would have presented w/ postcoital bleeding or irregular vaginal bleeding - this is a key feature of cervical cancer. I think given the choice between cervical cancer or dysplasia the better choice would've been cancer given the reasons I cited in my original response, but OP failed to include the other answer choices which fit the picture much better. Good reminder for all of us not to jump to conclusions without analyzing all of the options. As a side note, I found the OB-GYN shelf exam to be similar in this regard - you're always looking for the best answer, or the one that fits the question stem the best even though other choices share some similarities with the presentation.
No idea about this question.
A 30-year-old woman comes to the physician for a routine examination. Her Last office visit was 5 years ago. Her mother had breast cancer at the age of 58 years. Her father died of a myocardial infarction at the age of 39 years. Her 36-year-old brother has type 2 diabetes mellitus. She has smoked one pack of cigarettes daily for 6 years. She uses an oral contraceptive. She is 157 cm (5 ft 2 in) tall and weighs 95 kg (210 lb); BMI is 38 kg/m2.
What is the most appropriate screening test???
ECG
mammography
measure CA 125
measure cholesterol
measure FSH
Test for occult blood
test for chlamydia
test thyroid function--wrong answer
ultrasonography of pelvis
X-ray of chest
Was it cholesterol???
This was an NBME question, on one of the psych NBMEs wasn't it? I feel like I've seen it really recently, and I put menarche is imminent.
Reassurance seems right. Pain is likely mittelschmerz (mid-cycle pain due to ovulation) which is entirely normal. Obviously leuprolide therapy is wrong, doesn't seem to be any indication for pelvic US at this time, and there's no need to test for STDs if she's never been sexually active, has a normal PE and pelvic exam and has no symptoms you'd expect from those bugs.Thoughts of the questions below would be appreciated. Reassurance sounds right, but I recall being told that in that age group STD testing maybe appropriate.
18 y/o nulligravid woman, health maintenance exam. c/o sharp brief pain in one of the adnexal regions, occurs days 13 and 14 of menstrual cycle. Menarche @ 13 y/o, menese occur @ 28 day interval, w/ normal flow. never been sexually active. PE & pelvic exam are normal. Most appropriate next step in management.
Reassurance, testing for N. gonorrhoeae and chlamydia, pelvic u/s, leuprolide therapy,
Thoughts of the questions below would be appreciated. Reassurance sounds right, but I recall being told that in that age group STD testing maybe appropriate.
18 y/o nulligravid woman, health maintenance exam. c/o sharp brief pain in one of the adnexal regions, occurs days 13 and 14 of menstrual cycle. Menarche @ 13 y/o, menese occur @ 28 day interval, w/ normal flow. never been sexually active. PE & pelvic exam are normal. Most appropriate next step in management.
Reassurance, testing for N. gonorrhoeae and chlamydia, pelvic u/s, leuprolide therapy,
Thank you.Reassurance seems right. Pain is likely mittelschmerz (mid-cycle pain due to ovulation) which is entirely normal. Obviously leuprolide therapy is wrong, doesn't seem to be any indication for pelvic US at this time, and there's no need to test for STDs if she's never been sexually active, has a normal PE and pelvic exam and has no symptoms you'd expect from those bugs.
Yeah, like Vexare said, reassurance because it's mittelshmertz. Btw, there's a thread dedicated to the Ob/Gyn NBME's if you want to check if any other Q's you have are already answered there.
Thanks.
Is this the one you are referring to?
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/ob-gyn-nbme-1-and-2-thread.1107107/
Appreciate the information.Yep! I think at this point there's only not a dedicated NBME thread for FM.