- Joined
- May 2, 2006
- Messages
- 890
- Reaction score
- 13
The majority of NS residencies are at a base of 6 years. The reason you sometimes hear 5 is because the first year was often General Surgery prior to moving to NS; however, this is essentally being eliminated. The 7 years is if an individual does a research year. Fellowship training (such as spine, skull base, etc.) will often tack on additional time on top of the standard training timeline.Thanks for the helpful thread. I had a couple of questions that weren't so easy to look up. What determines if the NS training is 5 years vs 7 or 8? From what I heard is that the 5 years is just the residency, and then the extra 2 years are for the fellowship for the total of 7.
Generally, <5% of all NS allopathic housestaff are DOs. However, it's important to remember that there are NS DO residencies, for which only DOs are eligible. There has been some speculation as to the quality of some DO NS residencies, but they do exist and produce competent Neurosurgeons.Also, as someone pointed out, it probably is very difficult to match from a DO school.
It plays a role, but not overly more so than in other specialties. The trend is evident because a large part of "prestigious" medical school graduating classes are from "prestigious" undergraduate institutions. In turn, many of the people who match into "prestigious" residencies are from "prestigious" medical schools. There is certainly variation to this, but a trend does exist. People who put value in the name of an institution are also likelier to try extra hard to land such an institution. But to most people who aren't particularly interested in an academic career where name-dropping is more heavily emphasized, name is not as important as finding a place that has the right balance of attributes for them and as a result will be a place where they'd be happiest to train.What about the role that the rank of your MD school plays? As I was browsing through the resident profiles in places like UCSF and Harvard, it is easy to see that almost 90% of their residents have pedigree, often in both the undergrad and the medschool. This sure could be self-selection bias, but I am not sure.
"Ease" of landing auditions at a particular program is directly proportional to the "ease" of matching into it. Programs will rotate the people who have the best chance of (and in their opinions, likeliest to rank them) matching at the location. The better a match an applicant seems, the likelier they are to be granted a rotation.How easy is it to do an away rotation at one of these top notch programs? Are there any criteria which determine if you will be granted the request to do an away rotation?
[/QUOTE]Also, if the program grants you an interview, then I am assuming you can go ahead and tank them as #1 without being afraid that you won't have a shot there just because it is top notch.
You should always rank every program you interview at that you would like to train at. Even if you feel your interview went atrociously and they're going to burn any trace of you ever stepping foot into their hospital the moment you're out of earshot, if you liked that program the most, you should still rank it #1. Remember, you're matched according to the highest program you ranked and the highest spot a program ranked you. When those line up, you match. If a program ranked you highly enough to get a spot, but you didn't rank them, you'll go unmatched if none of the programs you did rank endedup filling with applicants they ranked higher than you.