Please allow me to introduce my self, I am student who doing a research and I would like to ask you
Which is the best interpretation to explain (OR = 2.76 [2.180 - 3.492] for livestock such as goats, sheep and pigs correlated with Malaria in certain community through cross sectional study, in these sentences below?
Respondents or household who keep livestock such as goats, sheep and pigs have a 2.8 times greater chance of contracting malaria compared to a respondents or household who do not raise cattle where the confidence interval [CI: 2.180 - 3492])
or
By using multiple logistic regression, we concluded that residents who raised cattle, goats, sheep and pigs increased the risk of getting malaria by 2.8 times compared to participants who did not keep cattle (OR = 2.76 [2.180 - 3.492], after controlling for other covariates in the areas under investigation.
or
This implies that the participants or households who raise cattle such as goats, sheep and pigs, respectively, have the increased risk of contracting malaria by 2.8 times higher than participants who do not keep the livestock/pets, after adjusting other predictor variables.
Annotated Stata Output: Ordered Logistic Regression, like attached
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
Best regards
Which is the best interpretation to explain (OR = 2.76 [2.180 - 3.492] for livestock such as goats, sheep and pigs correlated with Malaria in certain community through cross sectional study, in these sentences below?
Respondents or household who keep livestock such as goats, sheep and pigs have a 2.8 times greater chance of contracting malaria compared to a respondents or household who do not raise cattle where the confidence interval [CI: 2.180 - 3492])
or
By using multiple logistic regression, we concluded that residents who raised cattle, goats, sheep and pigs increased the risk of getting malaria by 2.8 times compared to participants who did not keep cattle (OR = 2.76 [2.180 - 3.492], after controlling for other covariates in the areas under investigation.
or
This implies that the participants or households who raise cattle such as goats, sheep and pigs, respectively, have the increased risk of contracting malaria by 2.8 times higher than participants who do not keep the livestock/pets, after adjusting other predictor variables.
Annotated Stata Output: Ordered Logistic Regression, like attached
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
Best regards