Hi all,
So I study my butt off, I know all the material, and then when I get into my school's weekly tests, there's inevitably some questions that I just cannot figure out. I'm trying to figure out wherein lies the problem: is it in how I'm being taught, in a lack of me seeking external resources, am I just stupid? ...Whatever it may be, I'd like to figure it out.
Here's an example: We are studying H2O/Na balance and the kidneys right now. We learned all about clearance rates (using the formula C = ([X]urine/[X]plasma) x V), but we were never taught about free water clearance by the kidneys. We were never taught what "free water clearance" means, but apparently if the urine is isosmotic to the plasma, free water clearance is 0. Thus, if someone has a free water clearance of 10 ml/min, it means is their urine is hyposmotic to their plasma and free water is being extracted from their body.
On the test, we were asked what it means if an individual has a free water clearance of 10 ml/min. Apparently, we were expected to deduce that it means he just drank 1L of pure water. I could easily do this if I had the aforementioned definition of what "free water clearance" means and that it is 0 if the urine is isosmotic to the plasma. However, all I had to work with is the formula I gave above for clearance and some basic knowledge of kidney function. I didn't know if the kidneys had a "set" free water clearance that I just wasn't aware of, I didn't know exactly what "free water" meant, etc.; it was just never taught to us.
Anyways, this happens pretty often, I feel like I'm being tested on concepts I was not taught. So I'm asking if you smarties out there have any insight on how you can make logical leaps on questions like this without full knowledge of what is going on, or if this sort of thing is just not a nice question to ask someone without giving them more background knowledge. Thanks!
So I study my butt off, I know all the material, and then when I get into my school's weekly tests, there's inevitably some questions that I just cannot figure out. I'm trying to figure out wherein lies the problem: is it in how I'm being taught, in a lack of me seeking external resources, am I just stupid? ...Whatever it may be, I'd like to figure it out.
Here's an example: We are studying H2O/Na balance and the kidneys right now. We learned all about clearance rates (using the formula C = ([X]urine/[X]plasma) x V), but we were never taught about free water clearance by the kidneys. We were never taught what "free water clearance" means, but apparently if the urine is isosmotic to the plasma, free water clearance is 0. Thus, if someone has a free water clearance of 10 ml/min, it means is their urine is hyposmotic to their plasma and free water is being extracted from their body.
On the test, we were asked what it means if an individual has a free water clearance of 10 ml/min. Apparently, we were expected to deduce that it means he just drank 1L of pure water. I could easily do this if I had the aforementioned definition of what "free water clearance" means and that it is 0 if the urine is isosmotic to the plasma. However, all I had to work with is the formula I gave above for clearance and some basic knowledge of kidney function. I didn't know if the kidneys had a "set" free water clearance that I just wasn't aware of, I didn't know exactly what "free water" meant, etc.; it was just never taught to us.
Anyways, this happens pretty often, I feel like I'm being tested on concepts I was not taught. So I'm asking if you smarties out there have any insight on how you can make logical leaps on questions like this without full knowledge of what is going on, or if this sort of thing is just not a nice question to ask someone without giving them more background knowledge. Thanks!