rads forum died hard in the aftermath of the ROL ordeal, lol. I've never seen a thread so quiet.
good luck in the match everyone
good luck in the match everyone
rads forum died hard in the aftermath of the ROL ordeal, lol. I've never seen a thread so quiet.
good luck in the match everyone
what are their plans to rectify this situationI think honest mistakes were made by admin., but they tried to rectify. There is a valuable lesson to be learned here. I doubt anything like this would happen again, and Im sure they wish they could go back in time and act differently.
Are we beyond forgiveness? Lets hope not, bc all humans are prone to mistakes, right?
You're absolutely correct. The decision was wrong and not in line with normal activity at SDN.Ridiculous and counterintuitive to the mission statement of this forum. I'm probably going to get banned by my statement, but idc.
rads forum died hard in the aftermath of the ROL ordeal, lol. I've never seen a thread so quiet.
good luck in the match everyone
Zero chance you get banned: freedom of expression is intrinsic to SDN's fiber.
Wrong.
im curious, what did you do to warrant that sort of punishment? I've crossed many lines on forum so far and people gave me over 300 likes. some even PM me their pet's pictures.You've gotta explain what you mean here.
Keep in mind that I had my account held for 2 weeks some time ago, so I have first hand knowledge of how it feels to be "censored."
But honestly, they have to draw the line somewhere and maintain forum decorum.
Otherwise, with the amount of flaming, trolling, and spamming that CAN happen with these types of public sharing sites, SDN would effectively cease to offer a meaningful forum at all.
i made a philosophical statement couple days ago regarding eating dogs and cats = no diff than eating chickens and cows b/c they're all animasl, so people hate me for being real.Flaming/rudeness
I deserved it though, and I had two warnings before hand. I was still learning the ropes.
They PM you pictures of pets? LOL why?
dont be a hypocrite, they're all animals. billions of people starving in the world and people care more about dogs/cats than other humans.I love me a good cat.
eww no way
dont be a hypocrite, they're all animals. billions of people starving in the world and people care more about dogs/cats than other humans.
ill give you $100 if you put that on your personal statement
consumed. my fellow americans and village folks in the western world continuously stereotype ppl from the east for eating dogs, etc, but they dont realize that folks are starvng and they will eat whatever animal they can find. im just amused at how ignorant and hypocritical the world is.I'm confused. Are you saying you think cats/dogs should be consumed in the western world or that they should be held in higher regard?
I mean, if I were starving and I had no other choice...you do what you gotta do.
ill give you $100 if you put that on your personal statement
in the past yeah. brah i can sense the bait a mile away. it makes no difference, if im starving with nothing to eat and there's a dog in front of me, it's BBQ time. common sense.Do you own a dog?
in the past yeah. brah i can sense the bait a mile away. it makes no difference, if im starving with nothing to eat and there's a dog in front of me, it's BBQ time. common sense.
in the past yeah. brah i can sense the bait a mile away. it makes no difference, if im starving with nothing to eat and there's a dog in front of me, it's BBQ time. common sense.
i'd be significantly more deterred to eat my species. honestly, i cant answer that question, hopefully that scenario will never arise. i had this debate last night in another thread.Would you eat another human if you were starving? Serious question, same argument
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
I don't "get" this controversy. People were account sharing. You're not supposed to do that. It's not that hard. Separately, it's amusing to me how the radiology forum uses anonymous accounts so much and has large megathreads of program reviews, more than most/any other specialties. Why is that? There's also the weird obsession with program rankings and tiers.
Maybe I missed those threads in other forums.
Are there really that few reviews in other specialties? I feel like that many rads programs aren't reviewedI don't "get" this controversy. People were account sharing. You're not supposed to do that. It's not that hard. Separately, it's amusing to me how the radiology forum uses anonymous accounts so much and has large megathreads of program reviews, more than most/any other specialties. Why is that? There's also the weird obsession with program rankings and tiers.
Maybe I missed those threads in other forums.