RustedFox,
I think in general, blaming "millennials" for this type of behavior is a poor excuse. As I read through your posts on this subject, all I see is the stereotypical anger each preceding generation throws on down the line. The old adage of "I walked 5 miles...both...ways..." Even when people agree that yes- you've had some bad scribes, but they've had very good experiences with them, you seem to ignore it. Several people have also pointed out that it may be unclear expectations or other factors in your interactions that are resulting in this, and yet- you continue to ignore them.
Perhaps you haven't read the entire thread, or are just being very selective in your rhetoric. The scribes across the board at my primary job site... suck. Many posters agreed, given the data I provided. Some claimed that my expectations were too high. I get that; after all, the thread title that I've written leaves room for me to invite criticism. Some time passed. I worked a few shifts at job site "B". The scribes there were light-years better. I bring this fact to light to the person who is in-charge of scribe quality at job site "A", and rather than recognizing their position, accepting the criticism, and wanting to get better... they cried and blameshifted. They don't have to take my word for it; but if they're in for a rude awakening in graduate school or the "real world" beyond. I haven't ignored anything.
Even if your stereotypes proved to be true, it would be a reflection of the societal & family structures that the preceding generation provided. Children and young adult rarely have autonomy/control over the educational and workplace dynamics that exist.
Stereotypes exist for a reason; its because there is a common kernel of truth in there that is generally recognized.
I think it's sad that see this cliched generational mud-sliding frustration come down, even in semi-anonymous forums. You've put all of these millennials in the "butthurt," category (your words), while also throwing in the overplayed transgender slur of "Seriously. This country is going to hell in a handbasket in the name of not hurting anyone's feelings. Meanwhile, there are 12 new genders this week."
You think its sad? Okay. What's sadder are the examples that Veers/McNinja/et.al provide, as well as the fact that the whole web has identified these traits as "millennial" because they're so common and prevalent in the said generation. Its not just me, you see. I was born in the last year of "Gen X", and some historians will call me a "millennial". I've got one foot in both camps. The criticisms leveled are pretty accurate from my viewpoint; so many of my cohort (siblings, even!) are struggling with adult life because they were underprepared and now are regressing to their snowflake safe-places. Its sad. Also sad is the fact that millions of our tax dollars are being wasted trying insane court cases and building separate bathrooms for people who can't figure out where to take a pee. It's a bathroom, not a place to address your feelings and achieve self-realization. Take a pee and get back to doing something else.
I get it. You've had some bad scribe interactions, and one (who called you a "meanie,") cried after you questioned her competence. I wonder more so if the criticism was delivered poorly, or if perhaps it had simply come from an older (and formerly idolized) physician whose sense of humor isn't shared by every person in the room (or generation).
I don't think you get it; at all. On multiple occasions, I have stated that I have tried constructive criticism, appeals to their strengths, modeling, whatever approach you want with our scribes. It has failed every time. I haven't even gone for the stick instead of the carrot, yet - as I have no power or authority to punish. I simply pointed out that they are being outclassed (outscribed?) and outperformed by others of their ilk and generation (a millennial receiving praise from me!? - boom goes your argument!), and look what happened... the snowflake melted because he/she was told (for once) that they weren't the *best*. What's more frustrating is that this person is in charge of training the other scribes and maintaining quality control. "Sorry - you're not the very best; like no one ever was. Now get a grip and get better."
I generally don't write a lot on SDN, but I've enjoyed things you've written in the past and was disappointed by your overly dismissive and belittling stereotypes. Certainly, education is a combination of tough love and support- but I'm surprised to find that you picture yourself as wise judge, prosecutor, and jury of the millennial generation's perceived poor work ethic and "snowflake," attitude.
The adage is generally quoted as "judge, jury, and executioner", just so you know. I have to be the judge here; I'm the one pointing out the problem. The jury is all of us who contribute to the thread. I get my vote. You have stated yours. I cannot be executioner, as I have no authority to punish. If it were up to me (and my medical director), we would fire our present lot of scribes outright at this point. Again, its not just me who has this opinion. You might just learn something if you listen. I was once in your position. I had bad interactions with my attendings sometimes as a student. I didn't throw a fit and demand a safe space. They were "right". I got better. The choice is yours.
If your attitude shown here reflects your "real life," behavior- I'm disappointed. For every one young resident/medical student/pre-med that finds personal growth in your midst, I bet several are likely avoiding your presence. Perhaps maybe you'll deem them weak millennials and therefore not worthy of your attention, but in essence- they'll just be looking for a mentor that teaches with respect, enthusiasm, and specific criticism that doesn't demean their generation or sociopolitical backgrounds.
Again; I don't think you've read the thread. On no occasion have I ever directly demeaned someone's generation or sociopolitical background. I criticized a scribe for not taking instruction and for not producing a passable chart; not because they were of a certain generation or political party. I made the association between the predictable outcome and the snowflake attitude of the generation on two occasions: the discussion with my assistant director, and on this thread. That you have transferred the criticism to yourself and others at large is very telling; you're tripping all over yourself on your way to being offended. Now... where have I heard that before?
All the best,
Thanks!
-wtffng