Would y'all say that DAT Destroyer for the sciences is overkill and way harder than the DAT? Or is it necessary to complete along with DAT bootcamp?
LolNow I don't know what to believe lol
I guess each test is different and completing Destroyer will make me better equipped to take the test, even if it is too much.
Would y'all say that DAT Destroyer for the sciences is overkill and way harder than the DAT? Or is it necessary to complete along with DAT bootcamp?
It was never about what was being said because constructive criticism is also good. I'm assuming the way things are being done is a combination of advertising, marketing, and trying to help the customer. However, I will also assume the shortfall is because of lack of social skills and experience and not thinking outside the box. The business aspect is normal (everyone does it), but it's the way that other aspects of it is being done that makes it abnormal. Bringing it up a notch means exactly that, which they still don't understand. It means a different idea .
...what?
As for the original question, I would say the Destroyer is harder than the real DAT for sure, but I think it's designed that way to prepare students strongly for the test. Overkill in terms of difficulty but not in terms of preparation.
This is just objectively not true. There is more than enough information between chad, cliffnotes, feralis, and boot camp to answer every science question on the test with the exception of maybe one or two random bio questions.Destroyer is a must for a high score. Do everything multiple times.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Lol is this guy a bot? Either I gotta work on my RC or this guy is on something.It was never about what was being said because constructive criticism is also good. I'm assuming the way things are being done is a combination of advertising, marketing, and trying to help the customer. However, I will also assume the shortfall is because of lack of social skills and experience and not thinking outside the box. The business aspect is normal (everyone does it), but it's the way that other aspects of it is being done that makes it abnormal. Bringing it up a notch means exactly that, which they still don't understand. It means a different idea .
People who are type A and post their scores on SDN also TEND to follow any advice on how to do well on the DAT, good and bad. This OCD audience is exactly who orgoman targets and convinces that they need to shell out hundreds of dollars for a large packet of trick questions well beyond the scope of the test.People the write off destroyer as over kill TEND to not score as high. There are plenty of people with 22/23 that didn't use destroyer but the vast majority of people that scored above a 21 used it
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Ok? I still don't like it.
This is just objectively not true. There is more than enough information between chad, cliffnotes, feralis, and boot camp to answer every science question on the test with the exception of maybe one or two random bio questions.
Not me.My roommate who is basically a clone of me also took 5 weeks to study. He used 2012 destroyer and got a 19 TS. 17 bio, 21 gc, 23 chem. He said it's useful for organic so use that information as you may. I got a 22 ochem 20 gc 21 bio without destroyer. There's some comparison for you to think about. I've also noticed people in sdn that get 23+ All use destroyer, and there are a lot of people getting sub 20s that use it as well.
Shhhhh, you're going to give all these pre-dents cognitive dissonance for wasting their money on a useless collection of overkill questions from orgoman.Not me.
I used Kaplan's book and google to get a 23.
This is true, in theory. However, time and money are important limits to consider since the DAT is only part of the dental school application. Therefore, it's important to honestly assess prep material in a cost/benefit fashion, accounting for both money and time cost. I believe the destroyer fails to make the cut.No dat prep questions are useless. Every single question has a purpose. The more exposure you get the better off you are.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile